Cargando…

Revisiting the Happy Jack Uraninite Reference Material: A Combined Electron Beam and Laser Ablation In Situ Study

This new comprehensive in situ mineral‐chemical characterisation of the Happy Jack uraninite has discovered additional information regarding matrix effects and trace element homogeneity, relevant to proposals that it could serve as a reference material (RM). On the LA‐ICP‐MS instrumentation used, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Lingli, Riegler, Thomas, Bonnetti, Christophe, McClenaghan, Sean, Kamber, Balz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37067871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12457
_version_ 1785023243946557440
author Zhou, Lingli
Riegler, Thomas
Bonnetti, Christophe
McClenaghan, Sean
Kamber, Balz
author_facet Zhou, Lingli
Riegler, Thomas
Bonnetti, Christophe
McClenaghan, Sean
Kamber, Balz
author_sort Zhou, Lingli
collection PubMed
description This new comprehensive in situ mineral‐chemical characterisation of the Happy Jack uraninite has discovered additional information regarding matrix effects and trace element homogeneity, relevant to proposals that it could serve as a reference material (RM). On the LA‐ICP‐MS instrumentation used, there was an absence of discernible matrix effects relative to the silicate glass NIST SRM 610. Lanthanides and Y are found to be very homogeneously distributed in Happy Jack uraninite, Zr, Nb and Ti mass fractions reproducible but only within individual fragments, and other elements still generally heterogeneous. This means that the Happy Jack uraninite can serve as a secondary RM for quality control in studies of natural uraninites. In terms of absolute accuracy and intermediate measurement precision, the Happy Jack uraninite can be used for the homogeneous elements. For elements that are homogeneous within individual fragments only, intermediate measurement precision can still be evaluated, while information values will be obtained for the generally heterogeneous elements. Two distinct groups (high vs. low Zr) were distinguished to exist among different Happy Jack fragments in association with minor variation of REE mass fractions, which possibly explains the observed (heavy) REE discrepancy between in situ laser ablation and bulk solution ICP‐MS analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10091993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100919932023-04-13 Revisiting the Happy Jack Uraninite Reference Material: A Combined Electron Beam and Laser Ablation In Situ Study Zhou, Lingli Riegler, Thomas Bonnetti, Christophe McClenaghan, Sean Kamber, Balz Geostand Geoanal Res Original Articles This new comprehensive in situ mineral‐chemical characterisation of the Happy Jack uraninite has discovered additional information regarding matrix effects and trace element homogeneity, relevant to proposals that it could serve as a reference material (RM). On the LA‐ICP‐MS instrumentation used, there was an absence of discernible matrix effects relative to the silicate glass NIST SRM 610. Lanthanides and Y are found to be very homogeneously distributed in Happy Jack uraninite, Zr, Nb and Ti mass fractions reproducible but only within individual fragments, and other elements still generally heterogeneous. This means that the Happy Jack uraninite can serve as a secondary RM for quality control in studies of natural uraninites. In terms of absolute accuracy and intermediate measurement precision, the Happy Jack uraninite can be used for the homogeneous elements. For elements that are homogeneous within individual fragments only, intermediate measurement precision can still be evaluated, while information values will be obtained for the generally heterogeneous elements. Two distinct groups (high vs. low Zr) were distinguished to exist among different Happy Jack fragments in association with minor variation of REE mass fractions, which possibly explains the observed (heavy) REE discrepancy between in situ laser ablation and bulk solution ICP‐MS analyses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-13 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10091993/ /pubmed/37067871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12457 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Association of Geoanalysts. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhou, Lingli
Riegler, Thomas
Bonnetti, Christophe
McClenaghan, Sean
Kamber, Balz
Revisiting the Happy Jack Uraninite Reference Material: A Combined Electron Beam and Laser Ablation In Situ Study
title Revisiting the Happy Jack Uraninite Reference Material: A Combined Electron Beam and Laser Ablation In Situ Study
title_full Revisiting the Happy Jack Uraninite Reference Material: A Combined Electron Beam and Laser Ablation In Situ Study
title_fullStr Revisiting the Happy Jack Uraninite Reference Material: A Combined Electron Beam and Laser Ablation In Situ Study
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the Happy Jack Uraninite Reference Material: A Combined Electron Beam and Laser Ablation In Situ Study
title_short Revisiting the Happy Jack Uraninite Reference Material: A Combined Electron Beam and Laser Ablation In Situ Study
title_sort revisiting the happy jack uraninite reference material: a combined electron beam and laser ablation in situ study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37067871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12457
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoulingli revisitingthehappyjackuraninitereferencematerialacombinedelectronbeamandlaserablationinsitustudy
AT rieglerthomas revisitingthehappyjackuraninitereferencematerialacombinedelectronbeamandlaserablationinsitustudy
AT bonnettichristophe revisitingthehappyjackuraninitereferencematerialacombinedelectronbeamandlaserablationinsitustudy
AT mcclenaghansean revisitingthehappyjackuraninitereferencematerialacombinedelectronbeamandlaserablationinsitustudy
AT kamberbalz revisitingthehappyjackuraninitereferencematerialacombinedelectronbeamandlaserablationinsitustudy