Cargando…

Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research

The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) has recently released the 2021 update of its guidelines. The update includes detailed new recommendations on human–animal chimera research. This paper argues that the ISSCR recommendations fail to address the core ethical concerns raised by ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Koplin, Julian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13104
_version_ 1785023252423245824
author Koplin, Julian J.
author_facet Koplin, Julian J.
author_sort Koplin, Julian J.
collection PubMed
description The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) has recently released the 2021 update of its guidelines. The update includes detailed new recommendations on human–animal chimera research. This paper argues that the ISSCR recommendations fail to address the core ethical concerns raised by neurological chimeras—namely, concerns about moral status. In minimising moral status concerns, the ISSCR both breaks rank with other major reports on human–animal chimera research and rely on controversial claims about the grounds of moral status that many people will rightly reject. A more robust framework for regulating human–animal chimera research still needs to be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100920322023-04-13 Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research Koplin, Julian J. Bioethics Original Articles The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) has recently released the 2021 update of its guidelines. The update includes detailed new recommendations on human–animal chimera research. This paper argues that the ISSCR recommendations fail to address the core ethical concerns raised by neurological chimeras—namely, concerns about moral status. In minimising moral status concerns, the ISSCR both breaks rank with other major reports on human–animal chimera research and rely on controversial claims about the grounds of moral status that many people will rightly reject. A more robust framework for regulating human–animal chimera research still needs to be developed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-02 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10092032/ /pubmed/36322916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13104 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Koplin, Julian J.
Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research
title Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research
title_full Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research
title_fullStr Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research
title_full_unstemmed Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research
title_short Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research
title_sort response to the isscr guidelines on human–animal chimera research
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13104
work_keys_str_mv AT koplinjulianj responsetotheisscrguidelinesonhumananimalchimeraresearch