Cargando…
Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research
The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) has recently released the 2021 update of its guidelines. The update includes detailed new recommendations on human–animal chimera research. This paper argues that the ISSCR recommendations fail to address the core ethical concerns raised by ne...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13104 |
_version_ | 1785023252423245824 |
---|---|
author | Koplin, Julian J. |
author_facet | Koplin, Julian J. |
author_sort | Koplin, Julian J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) has recently released the 2021 update of its guidelines. The update includes detailed new recommendations on human–animal chimera research. This paper argues that the ISSCR recommendations fail to address the core ethical concerns raised by neurological chimeras—namely, concerns about moral status. In minimising moral status concerns, the ISSCR both breaks rank with other major reports on human–animal chimera research and rely on controversial claims about the grounds of moral status that many people will rightly reject. A more robust framework for regulating human–animal chimera research still needs to be developed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100920322023-04-13 Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research Koplin, Julian J. Bioethics Original Articles The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) has recently released the 2021 update of its guidelines. The update includes detailed new recommendations on human–animal chimera research. This paper argues that the ISSCR recommendations fail to address the core ethical concerns raised by neurological chimeras—namely, concerns about moral status. In minimising moral status concerns, the ISSCR both breaks rank with other major reports on human–animal chimera research and rely on controversial claims about the grounds of moral status that many people will rightly reject. A more robust framework for regulating human–animal chimera research still needs to be developed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-02 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10092032/ /pubmed/36322916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13104 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Koplin, Julian J. Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research |
title | Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research |
title_full | Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research |
title_fullStr | Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research |
title_full_unstemmed | Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research |
title_short | Response to the ISSCR guidelines on human–animal chimera research |
title_sort | response to the isscr guidelines on human–animal chimera research |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koplinjulianj responsetotheisscrguidelinesonhumananimalchimeraresearch |