Cargando…

Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: A systematic review

PURPOSE: Signal detection is a crucial step in the discovery of post‐marketing adverse drug reactions. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected data to complement established spontaneous report analyses. This work aims to systematically review the methods for drug safety signal detec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coste, Astrid, Wong, Angel, Bokern, Marleen, Bate, Andrew, Douglas, Ian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36218170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5548
_version_ 1785023273585606656
author Coste, Astrid
Wong, Angel
Bokern, Marleen
Bate, Andrew
Douglas, Ian J.
author_facet Coste, Astrid
Wong, Angel
Bokern, Marleen
Bate, Andrew
Douglas, Ian J.
author_sort Coste, Astrid
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Signal detection is a crucial step in the discovery of post‐marketing adverse drug reactions. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected data to complement established spontaneous report analyses. This work aims to systematically review the methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected healthcare data and their performance, both in general and for specific types of drugs and outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, and registered a protocol in PROSPERO. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched until July 13, 2021. RESULTS: The review included 101 articles, among which there were 39 methodological works, 25 performance assessment papers, and 24 observational studies. Methods included adaptations from those used with spontaneous reports, traditional epidemiological designs, methods specific to signal detection with real‐world data. More recently, implementations of machine learning have been studied in the literature. Twenty‐five studies evaluated method performances, 16 of them using the area under the curve (AUC) for a range of positive and negative controls as their main measure. Despite the likelihood that performance measurement could vary by drug‐event pair, only 10 studies reported performance stratified by drugs and outcomes, in a heterogeneous manner. The replicability of the performance assessment results was limited due to lack of transparency in reporting and the lack of a gold standard reference set. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of methods have been described in the literature for signal detection with routinely collected data. No method showed superior performance in all papers and across all drugs and outcomes, performance assessment and reporting were heterogeneous. However, there is limited evidence that self‐controlled designs, high dimensional propensity scores, and machine learning can achieve higher performances than other methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100921282023-04-13 Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: A systematic review Coste, Astrid Wong, Angel Bokern, Marleen Bate, Andrew Douglas, Ian J. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Reviews PURPOSE: Signal detection is a crucial step in the discovery of post‐marketing adverse drug reactions. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected data to complement established spontaneous report analyses. This work aims to systematically review the methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected healthcare data and their performance, both in general and for specific types of drugs and outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, and registered a protocol in PROSPERO. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched until July 13, 2021. RESULTS: The review included 101 articles, among which there were 39 methodological works, 25 performance assessment papers, and 24 observational studies. Methods included adaptations from those used with spontaneous reports, traditional epidemiological designs, methods specific to signal detection with real‐world data. More recently, implementations of machine learning have been studied in the literature. Twenty‐five studies evaluated method performances, 16 of them using the area under the curve (AUC) for a range of positive and negative controls as their main measure. Despite the likelihood that performance measurement could vary by drug‐event pair, only 10 studies reported performance stratified by drugs and outcomes, in a heterogeneous manner. The replicability of the performance assessment results was limited due to lack of transparency in reporting and the lack of a gold standard reference set. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of methods have been described in the literature for signal detection with routinely collected data. No method showed superior performance in all papers and across all drugs and outcomes, performance assessment and reporting were heterogeneous. However, there is limited evidence that self‐controlled designs, high dimensional propensity scores, and machine learning can achieve higher performances than other methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-11-02 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10092128/ /pubmed/36218170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5548 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Coste, Astrid
Wong, Angel
Bokern, Marleen
Bate, Andrew
Douglas, Ian J.
Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: A systematic review
title Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: A systematic review
title_full Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: A systematic review
title_fullStr Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: A systematic review
title_short Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: A systematic review
title_sort methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36218170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5548
work_keys_str_mv AT costeastrid methodsfordrugsafetysignaldetectionusingroutinelycollectedobservationalelectronichealthcaredataasystematicreview
AT wongangel methodsfordrugsafetysignaldetectionusingroutinelycollectedobservationalelectronichealthcaredataasystematicreview
AT bokernmarleen methodsfordrugsafetysignaldetectionusingroutinelycollectedobservationalelectronichealthcaredataasystematicreview
AT bateandrew methodsfordrugsafetysignaldetectionusingroutinelycollectedobservationalelectronichealthcaredataasystematicreview
AT douglasianj methodsfordrugsafetysignaldetectionusingroutinelycollectedobservationalelectronichealthcaredataasystematicreview