Cargando…
Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success
BACKGROUND: Few standardized methods exist for evaluating the postoperative outcomes of osteocutaneous free flaps. We propose an anatomic‐based scoring system for midface free flap reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients across four institutions underwent osteocutaneous reconstructi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27228 |
_version_ | 1785023298704244736 |
---|---|
author | Swendseid, Brian Philips, Ramez H. W. Carey, Ryan M. Cannady, Steven B. Sweeny, Larissa Wax, Mark K. Luginbuhl, Adam J. Curry, Joseph M. |
author_facet | Swendseid, Brian Philips, Ramez H. W. Carey, Ryan M. Cannady, Steven B. Sweeny, Larissa Wax, Mark K. Luginbuhl, Adam J. Curry, Joseph M. |
author_sort | Swendseid, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few standardized methods exist for evaluating the postoperative outcomes of osteocutaneous free flaps. We propose an anatomic‐based scoring system for midface free flap reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients across four institutions underwent osteocutaneous reconstruction of the midface. Postoperative scans were scored based on the number of independent osseous subunits reconstructed (Subunit Score), the number of different bony appositions with bony contact (Contact Score), and the number of osseous segments in anatomic position (Position Score). These were added together to create a Total Score. RESULTS: Osteocutaneous radial forearm flaps had the lowest Subunit Score (p = 0.001). Fibula flaps had the highest Contact Score (p = 0.0008) and Position Score (p = 0.001). Virtual surgical planning was associated with an increased Subunit Score (p = 0.02) and Total Score (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a novel scoring system for osseous midface reconstruction based on postoperative imaging scans. This can help guide management decisions and create a common language to compare outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100922372023-04-13 Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success Swendseid, Brian Philips, Ramez H. W. Carey, Ryan M. Cannady, Steven B. Sweeny, Larissa Wax, Mark K. Luginbuhl, Adam J. Curry, Joseph M. Head Neck Original Articles BACKGROUND: Few standardized methods exist for evaluating the postoperative outcomes of osteocutaneous free flaps. We propose an anatomic‐based scoring system for midface free flap reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients across four institutions underwent osteocutaneous reconstruction of the midface. Postoperative scans were scored based on the number of independent osseous subunits reconstructed (Subunit Score), the number of different bony appositions with bony contact (Contact Score), and the number of osseous segments in anatomic position (Position Score). These were added together to create a Total Score. RESULTS: Osteocutaneous radial forearm flaps had the lowest Subunit Score (p = 0.001). Fibula flaps had the highest Contact Score (p = 0.0008) and Position Score (p = 0.001). Virtual surgical planning was associated with an increased Subunit Score (p = 0.02) and Total Score (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a novel scoring system for osseous midface reconstruction based on postoperative imaging scans. This can help guide management decisions and create a common language to compare outcomes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-27 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10092237/ /pubmed/36300998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27228 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Swendseid, Brian Philips, Ramez H. W. Carey, Ryan M. Cannady, Steven B. Sweeny, Larissa Wax, Mark K. Luginbuhl, Adam J. Curry, Joseph M. Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success |
title |
Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success |
title_full |
Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success |
title_fullStr |
Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success |
title_full_unstemmed |
Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success |
title_short |
Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success |
title_sort | postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: the value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swendseidbrian postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess AT philipsramezhw postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess AT careyryanm postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess AT cannadystevenb postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess AT sweenylarissa postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess AT waxmarkk postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess AT luginbuhladamj postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess AT curryjosephm postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess |