Cargando…

Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success

BACKGROUND: Few standardized methods exist for evaluating the postoperative outcomes of osteocutaneous free flaps. We propose an anatomic‐based scoring system for midface free flap reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients across four institutions underwent osteocutaneous reconstructi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swendseid, Brian, Philips, Ramez H. W., Carey, Ryan M., Cannady, Steven B., Sweeny, Larissa, Wax, Mark K., Luginbuhl, Adam J., Curry, Joseph M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27228
_version_ 1785023298704244736
author Swendseid, Brian
Philips, Ramez H. W.
Carey, Ryan M.
Cannady, Steven B.
Sweeny, Larissa
Wax, Mark K.
Luginbuhl, Adam J.
Curry, Joseph M.
author_facet Swendseid, Brian
Philips, Ramez H. W.
Carey, Ryan M.
Cannady, Steven B.
Sweeny, Larissa
Wax, Mark K.
Luginbuhl, Adam J.
Curry, Joseph M.
author_sort Swendseid, Brian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few standardized methods exist for evaluating the postoperative outcomes of osteocutaneous free flaps. We propose an anatomic‐based scoring system for midface free flap reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients across four institutions underwent osteocutaneous reconstruction of the midface. Postoperative scans were scored based on the number of independent osseous subunits reconstructed (Subunit Score), the number of different bony appositions with bony contact (Contact Score), and the number of osseous segments in anatomic position (Position Score). These were added together to create a Total Score. RESULTS: Osteocutaneous radial forearm flaps had the lowest Subunit Score (p = 0.001). Fibula flaps had the highest Contact Score (p = 0.0008) and Position Score (p = 0.001). Virtual surgical planning was associated with an increased Subunit Score (p = 0.02) and Total Score (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a novel scoring system for osseous midface reconstruction based on postoperative imaging scans. This can help guide management decisions and create a common language to compare outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100922372023-04-13 Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success Swendseid, Brian Philips, Ramez H. W. Carey, Ryan M. Cannady, Steven B. Sweeny, Larissa Wax, Mark K. Luginbuhl, Adam J. Curry, Joseph M. Head Neck Original Articles BACKGROUND: Few standardized methods exist for evaluating the postoperative outcomes of osteocutaneous free flaps. We propose an anatomic‐based scoring system for midface free flap reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients across four institutions underwent osteocutaneous reconstruction of the midface. Postoperative scans were scored based on the number of independent osseous subunits reconstructed (Subunit Score), the number of different bony appositions with bony contact (Contact Score), and the number of osseous segments in anatomic position (Position Score). These were added together to create a Total Score. RESULTS: Osteocutaneous radial forearm flaps had the lowest Subunit Score (p = 0.001). Fibula flaps had the highest Contact Score (p = 0.0008) and Position Score (p = 0.001). Virtual surgical planning was associated with an increased Subunit Score (p = 0.02) and Total Score (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a novel scoring system for osseous midface reconstruction based on postoperative imaging scans. This can help guide management decisions and create a common language to compare outcomes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-27 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10092237/ /pubmed/36300998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27228 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Swendseid, Brian
Philips, Ramez H. W.
Carey, Ryan M.
Cannady, Steven B.
Sweeny, Larissa
Wax, Mark K.
Luginbuhl, Adam J.
Curry, Joseph M.
Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success
title Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success
title_full Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success
title_fullStr Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success
title_short Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success
title_sort postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: the value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27228
work_keys_str_mv AT swendseidbrian postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess
AT philipsramezhw postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess
AT careyryanm postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess
AT cannadystevenb postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess
AT sweenylarissa postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess
AT waxmarkk postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess
AT luginbuhladamj postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess
AT curryjosephm postoperativeanalysisofosseousmidfacereconstructionsthevalueofimagingandanovelscoringsystemforcomplexityandoperativesuccess