Cargando…

MAGORINO: Magnitude‐only fat fraction and R(*) (2) estimation with Rician noise modeling

PURPOSE: Magnitude‐based fitting of chemical shift–encoded data enables proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and [Formula: see text] estimation where complex‐based methods fail or when phase data are inaccessible or unreliable. However, traditional magnitude‐based fitting algorithms do not account for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bray, Timothy J. P., Bainbridge, Alan, Lim, Emma, Hall‐Craggs, Margaret A., Zhang, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29493
_version_ 1785023310622359552
author Bray, Timothy J. P.
Bainbridge, Alan
Lim, Emma
Hall‐Craggs, Margaret A.
Zhang, Hui
author_facet Bray, Timothy J. P.
Bainbridge, Alan
Lim, Emma
Hall‐Craggs, Margaret A.
Zhang, Hui
author_sort Bray, Timothy J. P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Magnitude‐based fitting of chemical shift–encoded data enables proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and [Formula: see text] estimation where complex‐based methods fail or when phase data are inaccessible or unreliable. However, traditional magnitude‐based fitting algorithms do not account for Rician noise, creating a source of bias. To address these issues, we propose an algorithm for magnitude‐only PDFF and [Formula: see text] estimation with Rician noise modeling (MAGORINO). METHODS: Simulations of multi‐echo gradient‐echo signal intensities are used to investigate the performance and behavior of MAGORINO over the space of clinically plausible PDFF, [Formula: see text] , and SNR values. Fitting performance is assessed through detailed simulation, including likelihood function visualization, and in a multisite, multivendor, and multi‐field‐strength phantom data set and in vivo. RESULTS: Simulations show that Rician noise–based magnitude fitting outperforms existing Gaussian noise–based fitting and reveals two key mechanisms underpinning the observed improvement. First, the likelihood functions exhibit two local optima; Rician noise modeling increases the chance that the global optimum corresponds to the ground truth. Second, when the global optimum corresponds to ground truth for both noise models, the optimum from Rician noise modeling is closer to ground truth. Multisite phantom experiments show good agreement of MAGORINO PDFF with reference values, and in vivo experiments replicate the performance benefits observed in simulation. CONCLUSION: The MAGORINO algorithm reduces Rician noise–related bias in PDFF and [Formula: see text] estimation, thus addressing a key limitation of existing magnitude‐only fitting methods. Our results offer insight into the importance of the noise model for selecting the correct optimum when multiple plausible optima exist.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100922872023-04-13 MAGORINO: Magnitude‐only fat fraction and R(*) (2) estimation with Rician noise modeling Bray, Timothy J. P. Bainbridge, Alan Lim, Emma Hall‐Craggs, Margaret A. Zhang, Hui Magn Reson Med Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: Magnitude‐based fitting of chemical shift–encoded data enables proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and [Formula: see text] estimation where complex‐based methods fail or when phase data are inaccessible or unreliable. However, traditional magnitude‐based fitting algorithms do not account for Rician noise, creating a source of bias. To address these issues, we propose an algorithm for magnitude‐only PDFF and [Formula: see text] estimation with Rician noise modeling (MAGORINO). METHODS: Simulations of multi‐echo gradient‐echo signal intensities are used to investigate the performance and behavior of MAGORINO over the space of clinically plausible PDFF, [Formula: see text] , and SNR values. Fitting performance is assessed through detailed simulation, including likelihood function visualization, and in a multisite, multivendor, and multi‐field‐strength phantom data set and in vivo. RESULTS: Simulations show that Rician noise–based magnitude fitting outperforms existing Gaussian noise–based fitting and reveals two key mechanisms underpinning the observed improvement. First, the likelihood functions exhibit two local optima; Rician noise modeling increases the chance that the global optimum corresponds to the ground truth. Second, when the global optimum corresponds to ground truth for both noise models, the optimum from Rician noise modeling is closer to ground truth. Multisite phantom experiments show good agreement of MAGORINO PDFF with reference values, and in vivo experiments replicate the performance benefits observed in simulation. CONCLUSION: The MAGORINO algorithm reduces Rician noise–related bias in PDFF and [Formula: see text] estimation, thus addressing a key limitation of existing magnitude‐only fitting methods. Our results offer insight into the importance of the noise model for selecting the correct optimum when multiple plausible optima exist. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-02 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10092287/ /pubmed/36321525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29493 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling
Bray, Timothy J. P.
Bainbridge, Alan
Lim, Emma
Hall‐Craggs, Margaret A.
Zhang, Hui
MAGORINO: Magnitude‐only fat fraction and R(*) (2) estimation with Rician noise modeling
title MAGORINO: Magnitude‐only fat fraction and R(*) (2) estimation with Rician noise modeling
title_full MAGORINO: Magnitude‐only fat fraction and R(*) (2) estimation with Rician noise modeling
title_fullStr MAGORINO: Magnitude‐only fat fraction and R(*) (2) estimation with Rician noise modeling
title_full_unstemmed MAGORINO: Magnitude‐only fat fraction and R(*) (2) estimation with Rician noise modeling
title_short MAGORINO: Magnitude‐only fat fraction and R(*) (2) estimation with Rician noise modeling
title_sort magorino: magnitude‐only fat fraction and r(*) (2) estimation with rician noise modeling
topic Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29493
work_keys_str_mv AT braytimothyjp magorinomagnitudeonlyfatfractionandr2estimationwithriciannoisemodeling
AT bainbridgealan magorinomagnitudeonlyfatfractionandr2estimationwithriciannoisemodeling
AT limemma magorinomagnitudeonlyfatfractionandr2estimationwithriciannoisemodeling
AT hallcraggsmargareta magorinomagnitudeonlyfatfractionandr2estimationwithriciannoisemodeling
AT zhanghui magorinomagnitudeonlyfatfractionandr2estimationwithriciannoisemodeling