Cargando…

Inter‐rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale by staff members in a Swedish emergency department setting

INTRODUCTION: As frailty among the elderly is receiving increasing attention in emergency departments (EDs) around the world, the use of frailty assessment tools is growing. An often used such tool is the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), whose inter‐rater reliability has been sparingly investigated in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hörlin, Erika, Munir Ehrlington, Samia, Henricson, Joakim, John, Rani Toll, Wilhelms, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36200372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.14603
_version_ 1785023311468560384
author Hörlin, Erika
Munir Ehrlington, Samia
Henricson, Joakim
John, Rani Toll
Wilhelms, Daniel
author_facet Hörlin, Erika
Munir Ehrlington, Samia
Henricson, Joakim
John, Rani Toll
Wilhelms, Daniel
author_sort Hörlin, Erika
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: As frailty among the elderly is receiving increasing attention in emergency departments (EDs) around the world, the use of frailty assessment tools is growing. An often used such tool is the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), whose inter‐rater reliability has been sparingly investigated in ED settings. No inter‐rater reliability study regarding CFS has previously been performed within the Scandinavian ED context. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the inter‐rater reliability of the CFS in a Swedish ED setting. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted at three Swedish EDs. Patients ≥65 years were independently assessed with CFS by their responsible physician, registered nurse, and assistant nurse. Demographic information for each assessor was collected, along with frailty status (frail/not frail) on the basis of clinical judgment. Inter‐rater reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), whereas agreement of frailty assessed by CFS (dichotomized between frail/not frail, cutoff at ≥5 points) versus solely by clinical judgment was calculated by using cross‐tabulation. RESULTS: One‐hundred patients were included. We found inter‐rater reliability to be moderate to good (ICC 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.84), regardless of whether the care team included an emergency physician (ICC 0.74, 95% CI 0.62–0.83) or an intern/resident from another specialty (ICC 0.83, 95% CI 0.74–0.89). The agreement of clinically judged frailty compared to frailty according to CFS was 84%. In the opposing cases, staff tended to assess patients as frail to a higher extent using clinical judgment than by applying CFS on the same patient. CONCLUSIONS: The CFS appears to have a moderate to good inter‐rater reliability when used in a clinical ED setting. When guiding clinical decisions, we advise that the CFS score should be discussed within the team. Further research needs to be performed on the accuracy of clinical judgment to identify frailty in ED patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100922902023-04-13 Inter‐rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale by staff members in a Swedish emergency department setting Hörlin, Erika Munir Ehrlington, Samia Henricson, Joakim John, Rani Toll Wilhelms, Daniel Acad Emerg Med Original Contributions INTRODUCTION: As frailty among the elderly is receiving increasing attention in emergency departments (EDs) around the world, the use of frailty assessment tools is growing. An often used such tool is the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), whose inter‐rater reliability has been sparingly investigated in ED settings. No inter‐rater reliability study regarding CFS has previously been performed within the Scandinavian ED context. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the inter‐rater reliability of the CFS in a Swedish ED setting. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted at three Swedish EDs. Patients ≥65 years were independently assessed with CFS by their responsible physician, registered nurse, and assistant nurse. Demographic information for each assessor was collected, along with frailty status (frail/not frail) on the basis of clinical judgment. Inter‐rater reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), whereas agreement of frailty assessed by CFS (dichotomized between frail/not frail, cutoff at ≥5 points) versus solely by clinical judgment was calculated by using cross‐tabulation. RESULTS: One‐hundred patients were included. We found inter‐rater reliability to be moderate to good (ICC 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.84), regardless of whether the care team included an emergency physician (ICC 0.74, 95% CI 0.62–0.83) or an intern/resident from another specialty (ICC 0.83, 95% CI 0.74–0.89). The agreement of clinically judged frailty compared to frailty according to CFS was 84%. In the opposing cases, staff tended to assess patients as frail to a higher extent using clinical judgment than by applying CFS on the same patient. CONCLUSIONS: The CFS appears to have a moderate to good inter‐rater reliability when used in a clinical ED setting. When guiding clinical decisions, we advise that the CFS score should be discussed within the team. Further research needs to be performed on the accuracy of clinical judgment to identify frailty in ED patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-19 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10092290/ /pubmed/36200372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.14603 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Hörlin, Erika
Munir Ehrlington, Samia
Henricson, Joakim
John, Rani Toll
Wilhelms, Daniel
Inter‐rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale by staff members in a Swedish emergency department setting
title Inter‐rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale by staff members in a Swedish emergency department setting
title_full Inter‐rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale by staff members in a Swedish emergency department setting
title_fullStr Inter‐rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale by staff members in a Swedish emergency department setting
title_full_unstemmed Inter‐rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale by staff members in a Swedish emergency department setting
title_short Inter‐rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale by staff members in a Swedish emergency department setting
title_sort inter‐rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale by staff members in a swedish emergency department setting
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36200372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.14603
work_keys_str_mv AT horlinerika interraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscalebystaffmembersinaswedishemergencydepartmentsetting
AT munirehrlingtonsamia interraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscalebystaffmembersinaswedishemergencydepartmentsetting
AT henricsonjoakim interraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscalebystaffmembersinaswedishemergencydepartmentsetting
AT johnranitoll interraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscalebystaffmembersinaswedishemergencydepartmentsetting
AT wilhelmsdaniel interraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscalebystaffmembersinaswedishemergencydepartmentsetting