Cargando…

Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Selecting frail elderly patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) for pancreas resection using biologic age has not been elucidated. This study determined the feasibility of the deficit accumulation frailty index (DAFI) in identifying such patients and its association with surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scholer, Anthony J., Marcus, Rebecca, Garland‐Kledzik, Mary, Chang, Shu‐Chin, Khader, Adam, Santamaria‐Barria, Juan, Jutric, Zeljka, Wolf, Ronald, Goldfarb, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.27121
_version_ 1785023325707173888
author Scholer, Anthony J.
Marcus, Rebecca
Garland‐Kledzik, Mary
Chang, Shu‐Chin
Khader, Adam
Santamaria‐Barria, Juan
Jutric, Zeljka
Wolf, Ronald
Goldfarb, Melanie
author_facet Scholer, Anthony J.
Marcus, Rebecca
Garland‐Kledzik, Mary
Chang, Shu‐Chin
Khader, Adam
Santamaria‐Barria, Juan
Jutric, Zeljka
Wolf, Ronald
Goldfarb, Melanie
author_sort Scholer, Anthony J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Selecting frail elderly patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) for pancreas resection using biologic age has not been elucidated. This study determined the feasibility of the deficit accumulation frailty index (DAFI) in identifying such patients and its association with surgical outcomes. METHODS: The DAFI, which assesses frailty based on biologic age, was used to identify frail patients using clinical and health‐related quality‐of‐life data. The characteristics of frail and nonfrail patients were compared. RESULTS: Of 242 patients (median age, 75.5 years), 61.2% were frail and 32.6% had undergone pancreas resection (surgery group). Median overall survival (mOS) decreased in frail patients (7.13 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.65–10.1) compared with nonfrail patients (16.1 months, 95% CI: 11.47–34.40, p = 0.001). In the surgery group, mOS improved in the nonfrail patients (49.4%; 49.2 months, 95% CI: 29.3–79.9) compared with frail patients (50.6%, 22.1 months, 95% CI: 18.3–52.4, p = 0.10). In the no‐surgery group, mOS was better in nonfrail patients (54%; 10.81 months, CI 7.85–16.03) compared with frail patients (66%; 5.45 months, 95% CI: 4.34–7.03, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The DAFI identified elderly patients with PC at risk of poor outcomes and can identify patients who can tolerate more aggressive treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100923562023-04-13 Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection Scholer, Anthony J. Marcus, Rebecca Garland‐Kledzik, Mary Chang, Shu‐Chin Khader, Adam Santamaria‐Barria, Juan Jutric, Zeljka Wolf, Ronald Goldfarb, Melanie J Surg Oncol Pancreas BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Selecting frail elderly patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) for pancreas resection using biologic age has not been elucidated. This study determined the feasibility of the deficit accumulation frailty index (DAFI) in identifying such patients and its association with surgical outcomes. METHODS: The DAFI, which assesses frailty based on biologic age, was used to identify frail patients using clinical and health‐related quality‐of‐life data. The characteristics of frail and nonfrail patients were compared. RESULTS: Of 242 patients (median age, 75.5 years), 61.2% were frail and 32.6% had undergone pancreas resection (surgery group). Median overall survival (mOS) decreased in frail patients (7.13 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.65–10.1) compared with nonfrail patients (16.1 months, 95% CI: 11.47–34.40, p = 0.001). In the surgery group, mOS improved in the nonfrail patients (49.4%; 49.2 months, 95% CI: 29.3–79.9) compared with frail patients (50.6%, 22.1 months, 95% CI: 18.3–52.4, p = 0.10). In the no‐surgery group, mOS was better in nonfrail patients (54%; 10.81 months, CI 7.85–16.03) compared with frail patients (66%; 5.45 months, 95% CI: 4.34–7.03, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The DAFI identified elderly patients with PC at risk of poor outcomes and can identify patients who can tolerate more aggressive treatments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-02 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10092356/ /pubmed/36321409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.27121 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Pancreas
Scholer, Anthony J.
Marcus, Rebecca
Garland‐Kledzik, Mary
Chang, Shu‐Chin
Khader, Adam
Santamaria‐Barria, Juan
Jutric, Zeljka
Wolf, Ronald
Goldfarb, Melanie
Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection
title Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection
title_full Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection
title_fullStr Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection
title_full_unstemmed Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection
title_short Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection
title_sort validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection
topic Pancreas
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.27121
work_keys_str_mv AT scholeranthonyj validatingbiologicageinselectingelderlypatientswithpancreaticcancerforsurgicalresection
AT marcusrebecca validatingbiologicageinselectingelderlypatientswithpancreaticcancerforsurgicalresection
AT garlandkledzikmary validatingbiologicageinselectingelderlypatientswithpancreaticcancerforsurgicalresection
AT changshuchin validatingbiologicageinselectingelderlypatientswithpancreaticcancerforsurgicalresection
AT khaderadam validatingbiologicageinselectingelderlypatientswithpancreaticcancerforsurgicalresection
AT santamariabarriajuan validatingbiologicageinselectingelderlypatientswithpancreaticcancerforsurgicalresection
AT jutriczeljka validatingbiologicageinselectingelderlypatientswithpancreaticcancerforsurgicalresection
AT wolfronald validatingbiologicageinselectingelderlypatientswithpancreaticcancerforsurgicalresection
AT goldfarbmelanie validatingbiologicageinselectingelderlypatientswithpancreaticcancerforsurgicalresection