Cargando…
Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners
This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false‐positive error rate was estimated as 0....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15152 |
_version_ | 1785023328603340800 |
---|---|
author | Monson, Keith L. Smith, Erich D. Peters, Eugene M. |
author_facet | Monson, Keith L. Smith, Erich D. Peters, Eugene M. |
author_sort | Monson, Keith L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false‐positive error rate was estimated as 0.656% and 0.933% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, while the rate of false negatives was estimated as 2.87% and 1.87% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The majority of errors were made by a limited number of examiners. Because chi‐square tests of independence strongly suggest that error probabilities are not the same for each examiner, these are maximum‐likelihood estimates based on the beta‐binomial probability model and do not depend on an assumption of equal examiner‐specific error rates. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals are (0.305%, 1.42%) and (0.548%, 1.57%) for false positives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, and (1.89%, 4.26%) and (1.16%, 2.99%) for false negatives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with prior studies, despite its comprehensive design and challenging specimens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100923682023-04-13 Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners Monson, Keith L. Smith, Erich D. Peters, Eugene M. J Forensic Sci Original Papers This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false‐positive error rate was estimated as 0.656% and 0.933% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, while the rate of false negatives was estimated as 2.87% and 1.87% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The majority of errors were made by a limited number of examiners. Because chi‐square tests of independence strongly suggest that error probabilities are not the same for each examiner, these are maximum‐likelihood estimates based on the beta‐binomial probability model and do not depend on an assumption of equal examiner‐specific error rates. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals are (0.305%, 1.42%) and (0.548%, 1.57%) for false positives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, and (1.89%, 4.26%) and (1.16%, 2.99%) for false negatives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with prior studies, despite its comprehensive design and challenging specimens. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-01 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10092368/ /pubmed/36183147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15152 Text en Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Journal of Forensic Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Forensic Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Monson, Keith L. Smith, Erich D. Peters, Eugene M. Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners |
title | Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners |
title_full | Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners |
title_short | Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners |
title_sort | accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15152 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monsonkeithl accuracyofcomparisondecisionsbyforensicfirearmsexaminers AT smitherichd accuracyofcomparisondecisionsbyforensicfirearmsexaminers AT peterseugenem accuracyofcomparisondecisionsbyforensicfirearmsexaminers |