Cargando…

Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners

This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false‐positive error rate was estimated as 0....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monson, Keith L., Smith, Erich D., Peters, Eugene M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15152
_version_ 1785023328603340800
author Monson, Keith L.
Smith, Erich D.
Peters, Eugene M.
author_facet Monson, Keith L.
Smith, Erich D.
Peters, Eugene M.
author_sort Monson, Keith L.
collection PubMed
description This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false‐positive error rate was estimated as 0.656% and 0.933% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, while the rate of false negatives was estimated as 2.87% and 1.87% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The majority of errors were made by a limited number of examiners. Because chi‐square tests of independence strongly suggest that error probabilities are not the same for each examiner, these are maximum‐likelihood estimates based on the beta‐binomial probability model and do not depend on an assumption of equal examiner‐specific error rates. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals are (0.305%, 1.42%) and (0.548%, 1.57%) for false positives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, and (1.89%, 4.26%) and (1.16%, 2.99%) for false negatives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with prior studies, despite its comprehensive design and challenging specimens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100923682023-04-13 Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners Monson, Keith L. Smith, Erich D. Peters, Eugene M. J Forensic Sci Original Papers This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false‐positive error rate was estimated as 0.656% and 0.933% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, while the rate of false negatives was estimated as 2.87% and 1.87% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The majority of errors were made by a limited number of examiners. Because chi‐square tests of independence strongly suggest that error probabilities are not the same for each examiner, these are maximum‐likelihood estimates based on the beta‐binomial probability model and do not depend on an assumption of equal examiner‐specific error rates. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals are (0.305%, 1.42%) and (0.548%, 1.57%) for false positives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, and (1.89%, 4.26%) and (1.16%, 2.99%) for false negatives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with prior studies, despite its comprehensive design and challenging specimens. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-01 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10092368/ /pubmed/36183147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15152 Text en Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Journal of Forensic Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Forensic Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Monson, Keith L.
Smith, Erich D.
Peters, Eugene M.
Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners
title Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners
title_full Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners
title_fullStr Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners
title_short Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners
title_sort accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15152
work_keys_str_mv AT monsonkeithl accuracyofcomparisondecisionsbyforensicfirearmsexaminers
AT smitherichd accuracyofcomparisondecisionsbyforensicfirearmsexaminers
AT peterseugenem accuracyofcomparisondecisionsbyforensicfirearmsexaminers