Cargando…

The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness

When divergent populations interbreed, their alleles are brought together in hybrids. In the initial F1 cross, most divergent loci are heterozygous. Therefore, F1 fitness can be influenced by dominance effects that could not have been selected to function well together. We present a systematic study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneemann, Hilde, Munzur, Aslı D., Thompson, Ken A., Welch, John J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36221216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.14645
_version_ 1785023330764455936
author Schneemann, Hilde
Munzur, Aslı D.
Thompson, Ken A.
Welch, John J.
author_facet Schneemann, Hilde
Munzur, Aslı D.
Thompson, Ken A.
Welch, John J.
author_sort Schneemann, Hilde
collection PubMed
description When divergent populations interbreed, their alleles are brought together in hybrids. In the initial F1 cross, most divergent loci are heterozygous. Therefore, F1 fitness can be influenced by dominance effects that could not have been selected to function well together. We present a systematic study of these F1 dominance effects by introducing variable phenotypic dominance into Fisher's geometric model. We show that dominance often reduces hybrid fitness, which can generate optimal outbreeding followed by a steady decline in F1 fitness, as is often observed. We also show that “lucky” beneficial effects sometimes arise by chance, which might be important when hybrids can access novel environments. We then show that dominance can lead to violations of Haldane's Rule (reduced fitness of the heterogametic F1) but strengthens Darwin's Corollary (F1 fitness differences between cross directions). Taken together, results show that the effects of dominance on hybrid fitness can be surprisingly difficult to isolate, because they often resemble the effects of uniparental inheritance or expression. Nevertheless, we identify a pattern of environment‐dependent heterosis that only dominance can explain, and for which there is some suggestive evidence. Our results also show how existing data set upper bounds on the size of dominance effects. These bounds could explain why additive models often provide good predictions for later‐generation recombinant hybrids, even when dominance qualitatively changes outcomes for the F1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100923782023-04-13 The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness Schneemann, Hilde Munzur, Aslı D. Thompson, Ken A. Welch, John J. Evolution Original Articles When divergent populations interbreed, their alleles are brought together in hybrids. In the initial F1 cross, most divergent loci are heterozygous. Therefore, F1 fitness can be influenced by dominance effects that could not have been selected to function well together. We present a systematic study of these F1 dominance effects by introducing variable phenotypic dominance into Fisher's geometric model. We show that dominance often reduces hybrid fitness, which can generate optimal outbreeding followed by a steady decline in F1 fitness, as is often observed. We also show that “lucky” beneficial effects sometimes arise by chance, which might be important when hybrids can access novel environments. We then show that dominance can lead to violations of Haldane's Rule (reduced fitness of the heterogametic F1) but strengthens Darwin's Corollary (F1 fitness differences between cross directions). Taken together, results show that the effects of dominance on hybrid fitness can be surprisingly difficult to isolate, because they often resemble the effects of uniparental inheritance or expression. Nevertheless, we identify a pattern of environment‐dependent heterosis that only dominance can explain, and for which there is some suggestive evidence. Our results also show how existing data set upper bounds on the size of dominance effects. These bounds could explain why additive models often provide good predictions for later‐generation recombinant hybrids, even when dominance qualitatively changes outcomes for the F1. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-27 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10092378/ /pubmed/36221216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.14645 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Schneemann, Hilde
Munzur, Aslı D.
Thompson, Ken A.
Welch, John J.
The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness
title The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness
title_full The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness
title_fullStr The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness
title_full_unstemmed The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness
title_short The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness
title_sort diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36221216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.14645
work_keys_str_mv AT schneemannhilde thediverseeffectsofphenotypicdominanceonhybridfitness
AT munzuraslıd thediverseeffectsofphenotypicdominanceonhybridfitness
AT thompsonkena thediverseeffectsofphenotypicdominanceonhybridfitness
AT welchjohnj thediverseeffectsofphenotypicdominanceonhybridfitness
AT schneemannhilde diverseeffectsofphenotypicdominanceonhybridfitness
AT munzuraslıd diverseeffectsofphenotypicdominanceonhybridfitness
AT thompsonkena diverseeffectsofphenotypicdominanceonhybridfitness
AT welchjohnj diverseeffectsofphenotypicdominanceonhybridfitness