Cargando…

Experiences of co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program: Informing practice and policy

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore data and Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal researchers' experiences and reflexivity in co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program to inform practice and policy. SETTING: Gumbaynggirr, Birpai, Kamilaroi and Awabakal countri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Urquhart, Lisa, Roberts (Dunghutti), Karen, Gibbs (Muruwari), Clinton, Fisher, Karin, Brown, Leanne J., Duncanson, Kerith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12924
_version_ 1785023340509921280
author Urquhart, Lisa
Roberts (Dunghutti), Karen
Gibbs (Muruwari), Clinton
Fisher, Karin
Brown, Leanne J.
Duncanson, Kerith
author_facet Urquhart, Lisa
Roberts (Dunghutti), Karen
Gibbs (Muruwari), Clinton
Fisher, Karin
Brown, Leanne J.
Duncanson, Kerith
author_sort Urquhart, Lisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore data and Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal researchers' experiences and reflexivity in co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program to inform practice and policy. SETTING: Gumbaynggirr, Birpai, Kamilaroi and Awabakal countries located in regional and rural New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Rural and regionally located research team who co‐designed processes to challenge the status quo about a critically framed, rural‐based Aboriginal well‐being research project. DESIGN: Researchers drew on data from a research project in an interpretive cycle of collaborative Yarning. Data included 90 published articles, 12 Yarning transcripts and 26 reflective journal text sets, as well as researcher experiences and reflexivity. RESULTS: The Duguula Gayirray (Yarning together), Yandaarray (walking together) and Duguula Nguraljili (sharing together) co‐design practice model was developed to represent key actions in the context of an Aboriginal well‐being program in a rural context. Actions were supported by seven interpersonal ways of being and were underpinned by respectful relationships between community and researchers. DISCUSSION: Duguula Gayirray, Yandaarray and Duguula Nguraljili are critical to co‐design practice and are grounded in respectful relationships. Our experiences led us to critique our perceptions of power sharing, equitable partnerships and collaborative knowledges towards opportunity for collective research co‐design. CONCLUSION: Duguula Gayirray, Yandaarray and Duguula Nguraljili transformed our understanding of achieving liberation from dominant western research in the context of a rurally located Australian Aboriginal well‐being program. This study contributes to progression of Aboriginal health research practice and policy recommendations, enabling real cultural change in health care with rurally located Aboriginal communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100924182023-04-13 Experiences of co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program: Informing practice and policy Urquhart, Lisa Roberts (Dunghutti), Karen Gibbs (Muruwari), Clinton Fisher, Karin Brown, Leanne J. Duncanson, Kerith Aust J Rural Health Special Issue: Co Design OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore data and Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal researchers' experiences and reflexivity in co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program to inform practice and policy. SETTING: Gumbaynggirr, Birpai, Kamilaroi and Awabakal countries located in regional and rural New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Rural and regionally located research team who co‐designed processes to challenge the status quo about a critically framed, rural‐based Aboriginal well‐being research project. DESIGN: Researchers drew on data from a research project in an interpretive cycle of collaborative Yarning. Data included 90 published articles, 12 Yarning transcripts and 26 reflective journal text sets, as well as researcher experiences and reflexivity. RESULTS: The Duguula Gayirray (Yarning together), Yandaarray (walking together) and Duguula Nguraljili (sharing together) co‐design practice model was developed to represent key actions in the context of an Aboriginal well‐being program in a rural context. Actions were supported by seven interpersonal ways of being and were underpinned by respectful relationships between community and researchers. DISCUSSION: Duguula Gayirray, Yandaarray and Duguula Nguraljili are critical to co‐design practice and are grounded in respectful relationships. Our experiences led us to critique our perceptions of power sharing, equitable partnerships and collaborative knowledges towards opportunity for collective research co‐design. CONCLUSION: Duguula Gayirray, Yandaarray and Duguula Nguraljili transformed our understanding of achieving liberation from dominant western research in the context of a rurally located Australian Aboriginal well‐being program. This study contributes to progression of Aboriginal health research practice and policy recommendations, enabling real cultural change in health care with rurally located Aboriginal communities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-17 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10092418/ /pubmed/36250967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12924 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian Journal of Rural Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of National Rural Health Alliance Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue: Co Design
Urquhart, Lisa
Roberts (Dunghutti), Karen
Gibbs (Muruwari), Clinton
Fisher, Karin
Brown, Leanne J.
Duncanson, Kerith
Experiences of co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program: Informing practice and policy
title Experiences of co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program: Informing practice and policy
title_full Experiences of co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program: Informing practice and policy
title_fullStr Experiences of co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program: Informing practice and policy
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program: Informing practice and policy
title_short Experiences of co‐designing research about a rural Aboriginal well‐being program: Informing practice and policy
title_sort experiences of co‐designing research about a rural aboriginal well‐being program: informing practice and policy
topic Special Issue: Co Design
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12924
work_keys_str_mv AT urquhartlisa experiencesofcodesigningresearchaboutaruralaboriginalwellbeingprograminformingpracticeandpolicy
AT robertsdunghuttikaren experiencesofcodesigningresearchaboutaruralaboriginalwellbeingprograminformingpracticeandpolicy
AT gibbsmuruwariclinton experiencesofcodesigningresearchaboutaruralaboriginalwellbeingprograminformingpracticeandpolicy
AT fisherkarin experiencesofcodesigningresearchaboutaruralaboriginalwellbeingprograminformingpracticeandpolicy
AT brownleannej experiencesofcodesigningresearchaboutaruralaboriginalwellbeingprograminformingpracticeandpolicy
AT duncansonkerith experiencesofcodesigningresearchaboutaruralaboriginalwellbeingprograminformingpracticeandpolicy