Cargando…

Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased risk of fractures. However, it is unclear whether current osteoporosis treatments reduce fractures in individuals with diabetes. The aim of the study was to determine whether presence of T2D influences the efficacy of antiresorptive treatment for os...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eastell, Richard, Vittinghoff, Eric, Lui, Li‐Yung, Ewing, Susan K., Schwartz, Ann V., Bauer, Douglas C., Black, Dennis M., Bouxsein, Mary L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36065588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4697
_version_ 1785023349276016640
author Eastell, Richard
Vittinghoff, Eric
Lui, Li‐Yung
Ewing, Susan K.
Schwartz, Ann V.
Bauer, Douglas C.
Black, Dennis M.
Bouxsein, Mary L.
author_facet Eastell, Richard
Vittinghoff, Eric
Lui, Li‐Yung
Ewing, Susan K.
Schwartz, Ann V.
Bauer, Douglas C.
Black, Dennis M.
Bouxsein, Mary L.
author_sort Eastell, Richard
collection PubMed
description Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased risk of fractures. However, it is unclear whether current osteoporosis treatments reduce fractures in individuals with diabetes. The aim of the study was to determine whether presence of T2D influences the efficacy of antiresorptive treatment for osteoporosis using the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)–American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)–Study to Advance Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as a Regulatory Endpoint (SABRE) cohort, which includes individual patient data from randomized trials of osteoporosis therapies. In this study we included 96,385 subjects, 6.8% of whom had T2D, from nine bisphosphonate trials, two selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) trials, two trials of menopausal hormone therapy, one denosumab trial, and one odanacatib trial. We used Cox regression to obtain the treatment hazard ratio (HR) for incident nonvertebral, hip, and all fractures and logistic regression to obtain the treatment odds ratio (OR) for incident morphometric vertebral fractures, separately for T2D and non‐DM. We used linear regression to estimate the effect of treatment on 2‐year change in BMD (n = 49,099) and 3‐month to 12‐month change in bone turnover markers (n = 12,701) by diabetes status. In all analyses, we assessed the interaction between treatment and diabetes status. In pooled analyses of all 15 trials, we found that diabetes did not impact treatment efficacy, with similar reductions in vertebral, nonvertebral, all, and hip fractures, increases in total hip and femoral neck BMD, and reductions in serum C‐terminal cross‐linking telopeptide (CTX), urinary N‐telopeptide of type I collagen/creatinine (NTX/Cr) and procollagen type 1 N propeptide (P1NP) (all interactions p > 0.05). We found similar results for the pooled analysis of bisphosphonate trials. However, when we considered trials individually, we found a few interactions within individual studies between diabetes status and the effects of denosumab and odanacatib on fracture risk, change in BMD or bone turnover markers (BTMs). In sum, these results provide strong evidence that bisphosphonates and most licensed antiresorptive drugs are effective at reducing fracture risk and increasing BMD irrespective of diabetes status. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100924572023-04-13 Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk Eastell, Richard Vittinghoff, Eric Lui, Li‐Yung Ewing, Susan K. Schwartz, Ann V. Bauer, Douglas C. Black, Dennis M. Bouxsein, Mary L. J Bone Miner Res Research Articles Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased risk of fractures. However, it is unclear whether current osteoporosis treatments reduce fractures in individuals with diabetes. The aim of the study was to determine whether presence of T2D influences the efficacy of antiresorptive treatment for osteoporosis using the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)–American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)–Study to Advance Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as a Regulatory Endpoint (SABRE) cohort, which includes individual patient data from randomized trials of osteoporosis therapies. In this study we included 96,385 subjects, 6.8% of whom had T2D, from nine bisphosphonate trials, two selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) trials, two trials of menopausal hormone therapy, one denosumab trial, and one odanacatib trial. We used Cox regression to obtain the treatment hazard ratio (HR) for incident nonvertebral, hip, and all fractures and logistic regression to obtain the treatment odds ratio (OR) for incident morphometric vertebral fractures, separately for T2D and non‐DM. We used linear regression to estimate the effect of treatment on 2‐year change in BMD (n = 49,099) and 3‐month to 12‐month change in bone turnover markers (n = 12,701) by diabetes status. In all analyses, we assessed the interaction between treatment and diabetes status. In pooled analyses of all 15 trials, we found that diabetes did not impact treatment efficacy, with similar reductions in vertebral, nonvertebral, all, and hip fractures, increases in total hip and femoral neck BMD, and reductions in serum C‐terminal cross‐linking telopeptide (CTX), urinary N‐telopeptide of type I collagen/creatinine (NTX/Cr) and procollagen type 1 N propeptide (P1NP) (all interactions p > 0.05). We found similar results for the pooled analysis of bisphosphonate trials. However, when we considered trials individually, we found a few interactions within individual studies between diabetes status and the effects of denosumab and odanacatib on fracture risk, change in BMD or bone turnover markers (BTMs). In sum, these results provide strong evidence that bisphosphonates and most licensed antiresorptive drugs are effective at reducing fracture risk and increasing BMD irrespective of diabetes status. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-07 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10092457/ /pubmed/36065588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4697 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Eastell, Richard
Vittinghoff, Eric
Lui, Li‐Yung
Ewing, Susan K.
Schwartz, Ann V.
Bauer, Douglas C.
Black, Dennis M.
Bouxsein, Mary L.
Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk
title Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk
title_full Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk
title_fullStr Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk
title_full_unstemmed Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk
title_short Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk
title_sort diabetes mellitus and the benefit of antiresorptive therapy on fracture risk
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36065588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4697
work_keys_str_mv AT eastellrichard diabetesmellitusandthebenefitofantiresorptivetherapyonfracturerisk
AT vittinghofferic diabetesmellitusandthebenefitofantiresorptivetherapyonfracturerisk
AT luiliyung diabetesmellitusandthebenefitofantiresorptivetherapyonfracturerisk
AT ewingsusank diabetesmellitusandthebenefitofantiresorptivetherapyonfracturerisk
AT schwartzannv diabetesmellitusandthebenefitofantiresorptivetherapyonfracturerisk
AT bauerdouglasc diabetesmellitusandthebenefitofantiresorptivetherapyonfracturerisk
AT blackdennism diabetesmellitusandthebenefitofantiresorptivetherapyonfracturerisk
AT bouxseinmaryl diabetesmellitusandthebenefitofantiresorptivetherapyonfracturerisk