Cargando…
Chemosensory Functions After Glossectomy—A Cross‐Sectional Pilot Study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential interactions and compensatory mechanisms of subjectively impaired taste function with ortho‐ and retronasal olfaction after glossectomy. STUDY DESIGN: In this cross‐sectional pilot study, chemosensory functions were assessed in 25 patients with tongue carcinomas afte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36254878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.30454 |
_version_ | 1785023357393043456 |
---|---|
author | Grasl, Stefan Janik, Stefan Wiederstein, Stephanie Haymerle, Georg Renner, Bertold Mueller, Christan A. |
author_facet | Grasl, Stefan Janik, Stefan Wiederstein, Stephanie Haymerle, Georg Renner, Bertold Mueller, Christan A. |
author_sort | Grasl, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential interactions and compensatory mechanisms of subjectively impaired taste function with ortho‐ and retronasal olfaction after glossectomy. STUDY DESIGN: In this cross‐sectional pilot study, chemosensory functions were assessed in 25 patients with tongue carcinomas after glossectomy. The orthonasal‐, retronasal‐, and gustatory functions were tested with a mean time of 25 months after surgery with the Sniffin’ Sticks odor identification test kit (ISST), the Candy Smell‐27 test (CST‐27) and the Taste strip test (TST). Visual analog scales (VAS) were additionally used for self‐assessment of taste, flavor perception, and odor ranging from 0 (no perception) to 10 (excellent perception) and further correlated with our psychophysical evaluated outcome measures. RESULTS: The TST, ISST, and CST‐27 tests revealed that only eight (32%) and 13 (52%) glossectomy patients had normal taste and orthonasal function, e 21 (84%) patients showed normal retronasal function. Importantly, neither extent of resection and reconstruction nor prior radiotherapy affected chemosensory functions. Contrary, 20 (80%) patients rated their taste and flavor perception as acceptable (VAS >5). Results of the TST, ISST, and CST‐27 tests did not correlate with the equivalent self‐assessments of taste (p = 0.260, r = 0.234), odor (p = 0.588, r = −0.114), and flavor (p = 0.728, r = 0.073) perception. CONCLUSION: There was a significant discrepancy between self‐perception of taste and flavor and assessed gustatory function after glossectomy. A contribution of the intact retronasal olfactory system could be a possible explanation of our results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:375–382, 2023 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100924922023-04-13 Chemosensory Functions After Glossectomy—A Cross‐Sectional Pilot Study Grasl, Stefan Janik, Stefan Wiederstein, Stephanie Haymerle, Georg Renner, Bertold Mueller, Christan A. Laryngoscope OlfactionߚChemosensation OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential interactions and compensatory mechanisms of subjectively impaired taste function with ortho‐ and retronasal olfaction after glossectomy. STUDY DESIGN: In this cross‐sectional pilot study, chemosensory functions were assessed in 25 patients with tongue carcinomas after glossectomy. The orthonasal‐, retronasal‐, and gustatory functions were tested with a mean time of 25 months after surgery with the Sniffin’ Sticks odor identification test kit (ISST), the Candy Smell‐27 test (CST‐27) and the Taste strip test (TST). Visual analog scales (VAS) were additionally used for self‐assessment of taste, flavor perception, and odor ranging from 0 (no perception) to 10 (excellent perception) and further correlated with our psychophysical evaluated outcome measures. RESULTS: The TST, ISST, and CST‐27 tests revealed that only eight (32%) and 13 (52%) glossectomy patients had normal taste and orthonasal function, e 21 (84%) patients showed normal retronasal function. Importantly, neither extent of resection and reconstruction nor prior radiotherapy affected chemosensory functions. Contrary, 20 (80%) patients rated their taste and flavor perception as acceptable (VAS >5). Results of the TST, ISST, and CST‐27 tests did not correlate with the equivalent self‐assessments of taste (p = 0.260, r = 0.234), odor (p = 0.588, r = −0.114), and flavor (p = 0.728, r = 0.073) perception. CONCLUSION: There was a significant discrepancy between self‐perception of taste and flavor and assessed gustatory function after glossectomy. A contribution of the intact retronasal olfactory system could be a possible explanation of our results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:375–382, 2023 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-18 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10092492/ /pubmed/36254878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.30454 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | OlfactionߚChemosensation Grasl, Stefan Janik, Stefan Wiederstein, Stephanie Haymerle, Georg Renner, Bertold Mueller, Christan A. Chemosensory Functions After Glossectomy—A Cross‐Sectional Pilot Study |
title | Chemosensory Functions After Glossectomy—A Cross‐Sectional Pilot Study |
title_full | Chemosensory Functions After Glossectomy—A Cross‐Sectional Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Chemosensory Functions After Glossectomy—A Cross‐Sectional Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Chemosensory Functions After Glossectomy—A Cross‐Sectional Pilot Study |
title_short | Chemosensory Functions After Glossectomy—A Cross‐Sectional Pilot Study |
title_sort | chemosensory functions after glossectomy—a cross‐sectional pilot study |
topic | OlfactionߚChemosensation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36254878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.30454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graslstefan chemosensoryfunctionsafterglossectomyacrosssectionalpilotstudy AT janikstefan chemosensoryfunctionsafterglossectomyacrosssectionalpilotstudy AT wiedersteinstephanie chemosensoryfunctionsafterglossectomyacrosssectionalpilotstudy AT haymerlegeorg chemosensoryfunctionsafterglossectomyacrosssectionalpilotstudy AT rennerbertold chemosensoryfunctionsafterglossectomyacrosssectionalpilotstudy AT muellerchristana chemosensoryfunctionsafterglossectomyacrosssectionalpilotstudy |