Cargando…
Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the compromised extraction sockets using autogenous cortical‐lamina anchoring technique (CAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with ARP in the compro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36222202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13141 |
_version_ | 1785023382150971392 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Zehong Yang, Liqing Kang, Yujie Wang, Zhiping Ren, Fei Sun, Xuan Yang, Hong Zhang, Zhaoqiang |
author_facet | Guo, Zehong Yang, Liqing Kang, Yujie Wang, Zhiping Ren, Fei Sun, Xuan Yang, Hong Zhang, Zhaoqiang |
author_sort | Guo, Zehong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the compromised extraction sockets using autogenous cortical‐lamina anchoring technique (CAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with ARP in the compromised extraction sockets by applying CAT. Then implant placement and crown delivery was performed. A planned follow‐up was performed by analyzing various outcome measures to evaluate the clinical outcomes, including primary outcome measures [radiographic assessment of residual alveolar ridge height (RARH) and residual alveolar ridge width (RARW)] and secondary outcome measures [clinical assessment of the healing of the soft and hard tissue, survival rates of implants, marginal bone loss (MBL) evaluation of implants, buccal bone thickness (BBT), and esthetic treatment outcomes]. RESULTS: Among the 20 patients, 17 were consecutively treated and 3 dropped out after implant crown delivery because of loss to follow‐up. After the ARP, the initial RARH (12.37 mm) significantly increased to 19.29 mm (P < .05). No significant difference was detected in the RARW before (7.92 ± 1.18 mm) and after (7.92 ± 1.18 mm) the ARP, but reduce to 6.99 ± 1.18 mm at the implant placement and 6.64 ± 0.77 mm at the 3‐year follow‐up (P < .05). The MBL at the implant crown delivery (0.13 ± 0.12 mm) significantly increased to 0.31 ± 0.14 mm at 1‐year follow‐up and 0.56 ± 0.23 mm at 3‐year follow‐up, respectively. The bone loss was limited (<1 mm) but statistically significant (P < .05). The BBT at the implant placement (2.53 ± 0.56 mm) significantly reduced to 2.23 ± 0.44 mm at implant crown delivery and 2.14 ± 0.40 mm at 3‐year follow‐up, respectively. The bone loss was also limited (<0.5 mm) but statistically significant (P < .05). Each implant site showed acceptable aesthetic outcome and the average score was 16.4. The incisions healed uneventful in all patients and the implant survival rate was 100% during the 3‐year follow‐up. CONCLUSION: Autogenous CAT was successfully applied to preserve the height and width of alveolar ridge in the compromised extraction sockets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100925892023-04-13 Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study Guo, Zehong Yang, Liqing Kang, Yujie Wang, Zhiping Ren, Fei Sun, Xuan Yang, Hong Zhang, Zhaoqiang Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the compromised extraction sockets using autogenous cortical‐lamina anchoring technique (CAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with ARP in the compromised extraction sockets by applying CAT. Then implant placement and crown delivery was performed. A planned follow‐up was performed by analyzing various outcome measures to evaluate the clinical outcomes, including primary outcome measures [radiographic assessment of residual alveolar ridge height (RARH) and residual alveolar ridge width (RARW)] and secondary outcome measures [clinical assessment of the healing of the soft and hard tissue, survival rates of implants, marginal bone loss (MBL) evaluation of implants, buccal bone thickness (BBT), and esthetic treatment outcomes]. RESULTS: Among the 20 patients, 17 were consecutively treated and 3 dropped out after implant crown delivery because of loss to follow‐up. After the ARP, the initial RARH (12.37 mm) significantly increased to 19.29 mm (P < .05). No significant difference was detected in the RARW before (7.92 ± 1.18 mm) and after (7.92 ± 1.18 mm) the ARP, but reduce to 6.99 ± 1.18 mm at the implant placement and 6.64 ± 0.77 mm at the 3‐year follow‐up (P < .05). The MBL at the implant crown delivery (0.13 ± 0.12 mm) significantly increased to 0.31 ± 0.14 mm at 1‐year follow‐up and 0.56 ± 0.23 mm at 3‐year follow‐up, respectively. The bone loss was limited (<1 mm) but statistically significant (P < .05). The BBT at the implant placement (2.53 ± 0.56 mm) significantly reduced to 2.23 ± 0.44 mm at implant crown delivery and 2.14 ± 0.40 mm at 3‐year follow‐up, respectively. The bone loss was also limited (<0.5 mm) but statistically significant (P < .05). Each implant site showed acceptable aesthetic outcome and the average score was 16.4. The incisions healed uneventful in all patients and the implant survival rate was 100% during the 3‐year follow‐up. CONCLUSION: Autogenous CAT was successfully applied to preserve the height and width of alveolar ridge in the compromised extraction sockets. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-12 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10092589/ /pubmed/36222202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13141 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Guo, Zehong Yang, Liqing Kang, Yujie Wang, Zhiping Ren, Fei Sun, Xuan Yang, Hong Zhang, Zhaoqiang Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study |
title | Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study |
title_full | Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study |
title_short | Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study |
title_sort | clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: case series study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36222202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guozehong clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy AT yangliqing clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy AT kangyujie clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy AT wangzhiping clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy AT renfei clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy AT sunxuan clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy AT yanghong clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy AT zhangzhaoqiang clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy |