Cargando…

Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the compromised extraction sockets using autogenous cortical‐lamina anchoring technique (CAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with ARP in the compro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Zehong, Yang, Liqing, Kang, Yujie, Wang, Zhiping, Ren, Fei, Sun, Xuan, Yang, Hong, Zhang, Zhaoqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36222202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13141
_version_ 1785023382150971392
author Guo, Zehong
Yang, Liqing
Kang, Yujie
Wang, Zhiping
Ren, Fei
Sun, Xuan
Yang, Hong
Zhang, Zhaoqiang
author_facet Guo, Zehong
Yang, Liqing
Kang, Yujie
Wang, Zhiping
Ren, Fei
Sun, Xuan
Yang, Hong
Zhang, Zhaoqiang
author_sort Guo, Zehong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the compromised extraction sockets using autogenous cortical‐lamina anchoring technique (CAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with ARP in the compromised extraction sockets by applying CAT. Then implant placement and crown delivery was performed. A planned follow‐up was performed by analyzing various outcome measures to evaluate the clinical outcomes, including primary outcome measures [radiographic assessment of residual alveolar ridge height (RARH) and residual alveolar ridge width (RARW)] and secondary outcome measures [clinical assessment of the healing of the soft and hard tissue, survival rates of implants, marginal bone loss (MBL) evaluation of implants, buccal bone thickness (BBT), and esthetic treatment outcomes]. RESULTS: Among the 20 patients, 17 were consecutively treated and 3 dropped out after implant crown delivery because of loss to follow‐up. After the ARP, the initial RARH (12.37 mm) significantly increased to 19.29 mm (P < .05). No significant difference was detected in the RARW before (7.92 ± 1.18 mm) and after (7.92 ± 1.18 mm) the ARP, but reduce to 6.99 ± 1.18 mm at the implant placement and 6.64 ± 0.77 mm at the 3‐year follow‐up (P < .05). The MBL at the implant crown delivery (0.13 ± 0.12 mm) significantly increased to 0.31 ± 0.14 mm at 1‐year follow‐up and 0.56 ± 0.23 mm at 3‐year follow‐up, respectively. The bone loss was limited (<1 mm) but statistically significant (P < .05). The BBT at the implant placement (2.53 ± 0.56 mm) significantly reduced to 2.23 ± 0.44 mm at implant crown delivery and 2.14 ± 0.40 mm at 3‐year follow‐up, respectively. The bone loss was also limited (<0.5 mm) but statistically significant (P < .05). Each implant site showed acceptable aesthetic outcome and the average score was 16.4. The incisions healed uneventful in all patients and the implant survival rate was 100% during the 3‐year follow‐up. CONCLUSION: Autogenous CAT was successfully applied to preserve the height and width of alveolar ridge in the compromised extraction sockets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100925892023-04-13 Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study Guo, Zehong Yang, Liqing Kang, Yujie Wang, Zhiping Ren, Fei Sun, Xuan Yang, Hong Zhang, Zhaoqiang Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the compromised extraction sockets using autogenous cortical‐lamina anchoring technique (CAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with ARP in the compromised extraction sockets by applying CAT. Then implant placement and crown delivery was performed. A planned follow‐up was performed by analyzing various outcome measures to evaluate the clinical outcomes, including primary outcome measures [radiographic assessment of residual alveolar ridge height (RARH) and residual alveolar ridge width (RARW)] and secondary outcome measures [clinical assessment of the healing of the soft and hard tissue, survival rates of implants, marginal bone loss (MBL) evaluation of implants, buccal bone thickness (BBT), and esthetic treatment outcomes]. RESULTS: Among the 20 patients, 17 were consecutively treated and 3 dropped out after implant crown delivery because of loss to follow‐up. After the ARP, the initial RARH (12.37 mm) significantly increased to 19.29 mm (P < .05). No significant difference was detected in the RARW before (7.92 ± 1.18 mm) and after (7.92 ± 1.18 mm) the ARP, but reduce to 6.99 ± 1.18 mm at the implant placement and 6.64 ± 0.77 mm at the 3‐year follow‐up (P < .05). The MBL at the implant crown delivery (0.13 ± 0.12 mm) significantly increased to 0.31 ± 0.14 mm at 1‐year follow‐up and 0.56 ± 0.23 mm at 3‐year follow‐up, respectively. The bone loss was limited (<1 mm) but statistically significant (P < .05). The BBT at the implant placement (2.53 ± 0.56 mm) significantly reduced to 2.23 ± 0.44 mm at implant crown delivery and 2.14 ± 0.40 mm at 3‐year follow‐up, respectively. The bone loss was also limited (<0.5 mm) but statistically significant (P < .05). Each implant site showed acceptable aesthetic outcome and the average score was 16.4. The incisions healed uneventful in all patients and the implant survival rate was 100% during the 3‐year follow‐up. CONCLUSION: Autogenous CAT was successfully applied to preserve the height and width of alveolar ridge in the compromised extraction sockets. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-12 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10092589/ /pubmed/36222202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13141 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Guo, Zehong
Yang, Liqing
Kang, Yujie
Wang, Zhiping
Ren, Fei
Sun, Xuan
Yang, Hong
Zhang, Zhaoqiang
Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study
title Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study
title_full Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study
title_fullStr Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study
title_short Clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: Case series study
title_sort clinical evaluations of alveolar ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets with cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: case series study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36222202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13141
work_keys_str_mv AT guozehong clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy
AT yangliqing clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy
AT kangyujie clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy
AT wangzhiping clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy
AT renfei clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy
AT sunxuan clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy
AT yanghong clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy
AT zhangzhaoqiang clinicalevaluationsofalveolarridgepreservationincompromisedextractionsocketswithcorticallaminaanchoringtechniquecaseseriesstudy