Cargando…

Gabapentin—Friend or foe?

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is a recommended first‐line agent for treating neuropathic pain; however, its efficacy rate is reportedly low, and the risk of adverse events is high. A plausible explanation for this lies with its wide range of actions, the entirety of which have yet to be fully elucidated. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russo, Marc, Graham, Brett, Santarelli, Danielle M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.13165
_version_ 1785023387433697280
author Russo, Marc
Graham, Brett
Santarelli, Danielle M.
author_facet Russo, Marc
Graham, Brett
Santarelli, Danielle M.
author_sort Russo, Marc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is a recommended first‐line agent for treating neuropathic pain; however, its efficacy rate is reportedly low, and the risk of adverse events is high. A plausible explanation for this lies with its wide range of actions, the entirety of which have yet to be fully elucidated. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted on gabapentin's known and proposed analgesic mechanisms of action, as well as potentially opposing or detrimental actions. RESULTS: Gabapentin's classical analgesic mechanisms involve direct attenuation of excitatory neurotransmission in the spinal cord via inhibition of neuronal ion channels, while indirect mechanisms include descending inhibition and block of injury‐evoked synaptogenesis. Glial effects have also been reported; however, whether they are neuroprotective or detrimental is unknown. Furthermore, data from animal models do not reflect clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin's clinical use should be reconsidered according to the net effects of its numerous assumed actions, including the tripartite synapse and oligodendrocyte effects. Whether it is doing more harm than good, especially in the scenarios of incomplete or loss of response, warrants consideration when prescribing gabapentin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100926112023-04-13 Gabapentin—Friend or foe? Russo, Marc Graham, Brett Santarelli, Danielle M. Pain Pract Research Articles BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is a recommended first‐line agent for treating neuropathic pain; however, its efficacy rate is reportedly low, and the risk of adverse events is high. A plausible explanation for this lies with its wide range of actions, the entirety of which have yet to be fully elucidated. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted on gabapentin's known and proposed analgesic mechanisms of action, as well as potentially opposing or detrimental actions. RESULTS: Gabapentin's classical analgesic mechanisms involve direct attenuation of excitatory neurotransmission in the spinal cord via inhibition of neuronal ion channels, while indirect mechanisms include descending inhibition and block of injury‐evoked synaptogenesis. Glial effects have also been reported; however, whether they are neuroprotective or detrimental is unknown. Furthermore, data from animal models do not reflect clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin's clinical use should be reconsidered according to the net effects of its numerous assumed actions, including the tripartite synapse and oligodendrocyte effects. Whether it is doing more harm than good, especially in the scenarios of incomplete or loss of response, warrants consideration when prescribing gabapentin. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-27 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10092611/ /pubmed/36300903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.13165 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pain Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of World Institute of Pain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Russo, Marc
Graham, Brett
Santarelli, Danielle M.
Gabapentin—Friend or foe?
title Gabapentin—Friend or foe?
title_full Gabapentin—Friend or foe?
title_fullStr Gabapentin—Friend or foe?
title_full_unstemmed Gabapentin—Friend or foe?
title_short Gabapentin—Friend or foe?
title_sort gabapentin—friend or foe?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.13165
work_keys_str_mv AT russomarc gabapentinfriendorfoe
AT grahambrett gabapentinfriendorfoe
AT santarellidaniellem gabapentinfriendorfoe