Cargando…
Gabapentin—Friend or foe?
BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is a recommended first‐line agent for treating neuropathic pain; however, its efficacy rate is reportedly low, and the risk of adverse events is high. A plausible explanation for this lies with its wide range of actions, the entirety of which have yet to be fully elucidated. M...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.13165 |
_version_ | 1785023387433697280 |
---|---|
author | Russo, Marc Graham, Brett Santarelli, Danielle M. |
author_facet | Russo, Marc Graham, Brett Santarelli, Danielle M. |
author_sort | Russo, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is a recommended first‐line agent for treating neuropathic pain; however, its efficacy rate is reportedly low, and the risk of adverse events is high. A plausible explanation for this lies with its wide range of actions, the entirety of which have yet to be fully elucidated. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted on gabapentin's known and proposed analgesic mechanisms of action, as well as potentially opposing or detrimental actions. RESULTS: Gabapentin's classical analgesic mechanisms involve direct attenuation of excitatory neurotransmission in the spinal cord via inhibition of neuronal ion channels, while indirect mechanisms include descending inhibition and block of injury‐evoked synaptogenesis. Glial effects have also been reported; however, whether they are neuroprotective or detrimental is unknown. Furthermore, data from animal models do not reflect clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin's clinical use should be reconsidered according to the net effects of its numerous assumed actions, including the tripartite synapse and oligodendrocyte effects. Whether it is doing more harm than good, especially in the scenarios of incomplete or loss of response, warrants consideration when prescribing gabapentin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100926112023-04-13 Gabapentin—Friend or foe? Russo, Marc Graham, Brett Santarelli, Danielle M. Pain Pract Research Articles BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is a recommended first‐line agent for treating neuropathic pain; however, its efficacy rate is reportedly low, and the risk of adverse events is high. A plausible explanation for this lies with its wide range of actions, the entirety of which have yet to be fully elucidated. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted on gabapentin's known and proposed analgesic mechanisms of action, as well as potentially opposing or detrimental actions. RESULTS: Gabapentin's classical analgesic mechanisms involve direct attenuation of excitatory neurotransmission in the spinal cord via inhibition of neuronal ion channels, while indirect mechanisms include descending inhibition and block of injury‐evoked synaptogenesis. Glial effects have also been reported; however, whether they are neuroprotective or detrimental is unknown. Furthermore, data from animal models do not reflect clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin's clinical use should be reconsidered according to the net effects of its numerous assumed actions, including the tripartite synapse and oligodendrocyte effects. Whether it is doing more harm than good, especially in the scenarios of incomplete or loss of response, warrants consideration when prescribing gabapentin. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-27 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10092611/ /pubmed/36300903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.13165 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pain Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of World Institute of Pain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Russo, Marc Graham, Brett Santarelli, Danielle M. Gabapentin—Friend or foe? |
title | Gabapentin—Friend or foe? |
title_full | Gabapentin—Friend or foe? |
title_fullStr | Gabapentin—Friend or foe? |
title_full_unstemmed | Gabapentin—Friend or foe? |
title_short | Gabapentin—Friend or foe? |
title_sort | gabapentin—friend or foe? |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.13165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT russomarc gabapentinfriendorfoe AT grahambrett gabapentinfriendorfoe AT santarellidaniellem gabapentinfriendorfoe |