Cargando…

American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision

OBJECTIVE: In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean‐ and index‐based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Studenic, Paul, Aletaha, Daniel, de Wit, Maarten, Stamm, Tanja A., Alasti, Farideh, Lacaille, Diane, Smolen, Josef S., Felson, David T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.42347
_version_ 1785023398181601280
author Studenic, Paul
Aletaha, Daniel
de Wit, Maarten
Stamm, Tanja A.
Alasti, Farideh
Lacaille, Diane
Smolen, Josef S.
Felson, David T.
author_facet Studenic, Paul
Aletaha, Daniel
de Wit, Maarten
Stamm, Tanja A.
Alasti, Farideh
Lacaille, Diane
Smolen, Josef S.
Felson, David T.
author_sort Studenic, Paul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean‐ and index‐based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the 2 sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index‐based criteria. METHODS: We used data from 4 randomized trials comparing biologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0–10 cm) compared to the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analyzed agreement between the Boolean‐ and index‐based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI] and Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI]) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score ≤0.5) and radiographic nonprogression. RESULTS: Data from 2,048 trial participants, 1,101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared to Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8–4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Using the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index‐based remission criteria without jeopardizing predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index‐based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100926552023-04-13 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision Studenic, Paul Aletaha, Daniel de Wit, Maarten Stamm, Tanja A. Alasti, Farideh Lacaille, Diane Smolen, Josef S. Felson, David T. Arthritis Rheumatol Special Articles OBJECTIVE: In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean‐ and index‐based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the 2 sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index‐based criteria. METHODS: We used data from 4 randomized trials comparing biologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0–10 cm) compared to the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analyzed agreement between the Boolean‐ and index‐based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI] and Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI]) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score ≤0.5) and radiographic nonprogression. RESULTS: Data from 2,048 trial participants, 1,101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared to Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8–4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Using the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index‐based remission criteria without jeopardizing predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index‐based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022-10-23 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10092655/ /pubmed/36274193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.42347 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Special Articles
Studenic, Paul
Aletaha, Daniel
de Wit, Maarten
Stamm, Tanja A.
Alasti, Farideh
Lacaille, Diane
Smolen, Josef S.
Felson, David T.
American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision
title American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision
title_full American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision
title_fullStr American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision
title_full_unstemmed American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision
title_short American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision
title_sort american college of rheumatology/eular remission criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: 2022 revision
topic Special Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.42347
work_keys_str_mv AT studenicpaul americancollegeofrheumatologyeularremissioncriteriaforrheumatoidarthritis2022revision
AT aletahadaniel americancollegeofrheumatologyeularremissioncriteriaforrheumatoidarthritis2022revision
AT dewitmaarten americancollegeofrheumatologyeularremissioncriteriaforrheumatoidarthritis2022revision
AT stammtanjaa americancollegeofrheumatologyeularremissioncriteriaforrheumatoidarthritis2022revision
AT alastifarideh americancollegeofrheumatologyeularremissioncriteriaforrheumatoidarthritis2022revision
AT lacaillediane americancollegeofrheumatologyeularremissioncriteriaforrheumatoidarthritis2022revision
AT smolenjosefs americancollegeofrheumatologyeularremissioncriteriaforrheumatoidarthritis2022revision
AT felsondavidt americancollegeofrheumatologyeularremissioncriteriaforrheumatoidarthritis2022revision