Cargando…

The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement

INTRODUCTION: In mitral valve replacement (MVR), sudden increases in afterload and disruption of the annular‐chordal‐papillary‐left‐ventricular wall causes left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the early postoperative period. Preservation of the posterior mitral leaflet apparatus (MVR‐P) has a favora...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa, Avci Demir, Fulya, Bleetman, David, Eskandari, Mehdi, Khan, Habib, Baghai, Max, Deshpande, Ranjit, Monaghan, Mark J., Wendler, Olaf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.17049
_version_ 1785023418046873600
author Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa
Avci Demir, Fulya
Bleetman, David
Eskandari, Mehdi
Khan, Habib
Baghai, Max
Deshpande, Ranjit
Monaghan, Mark J.
Wendler, Olaf
author_facet Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa
Avci Demir, Fulya
Bleetman, David
Eskandari, Mehdi
Khan, Habib
Baghai, Max
Deshpande, Ranjit
Monaghan, Mark J.
Wendler, Olaf
author_sort Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In mitral valve replacement (MVR), sudden increases in afterload and disruption of the annular‐chordal‐papillary‐left‐ventricular wall causes left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the early postoperative period. Preservation of the posterior mitral leaflet apparatus (MVR‐P) has a favorable outcome on LV function. However, there is paucity of data on the impact of complete preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus (MVR‐C). OBJECTIVE: We investigated the impact of MVR‐P and MVR‐C on baseline and 3‐months postoperative LV ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 29 MVR‐P and 19 MVR‐C patients with complete echocardiography data at our unit, who were operated between 2008 and 2017. Between‐group changes in LVEF and GLS were compared using independent sample T‐test. RESULTS: Median age was 59 years (IQR 50–69 years). Baseline LVEF was 58% (51%– 60%). Baseline GLS was −18.4 (−21.2 to −15.5). There were no significant between‐group differences between all baseline demographics and echocardiographic markers. There was significantly higher absolute postoperative LVEF in MVR‐C patients (p = 0.029). There was also significant worsening in LVEF (p = 0.0121) and GLS (p < 0.0001) after MVR‐P and not MVR‐C, suggesting no reduction in LV function post‐MVR‐C but a reduction post‐MVR‐P. There was significantly less postoperative worsening of GLS per patient in MVR‐C group as compared to the MVR‐P group (p = 0.023), indicating better preservation of LV function. There was also a smaller decline in LVEF per patient in the MVR‐C as compared to the MVR‐P group, although not statistically significant (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: MVR with complete preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus shows a favorable impact on the longitudinal function of the heart at 3 months. Further studies with larger patient numbers are indicated to investigate the long‐term results of this surgical approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100927262023-04-13 The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa Avci Demir, Fulya Bleetman, David Eskandari, Mehdi Khan, Habib Baghai, Max Deshpande, Ranjit Monaghan, Mark J. Wendler, Olaf J Card Surg Regular Issue Papers INTRODUCTION: In mitral valve replacement (MVR), sudden increases in afterload and disruption of the annular‐chordal‐papillary‐left‐ventricular wall causes left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the early postoperative period. Preservation of the posterior mitral leaflet apparatus (MVR‐P) has a favorable outcome on LV function. However, there is paucity of data on the impact of complete preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus (MVR‐C). OBJECTIVE: We investigated the impact of MVR‐P and MVR‐C on baseline and 3‐months postoperative LV ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 29 MVR‐P and 19 MVR‐C patients with complete echocardiography data at our unit, who were operated between 2008 and 2017. Between‐group changes in LVEF and GLS were compared using independent sample T‐test. RESULTS: Median age was 59 years (IQR 50–69 years). Baseline LVEF was 58% (51%– 60%). Baseline GLS was −18.4 (−21.2 to −15.5). There were no significant between‐group differences between all baseline demographics and echocardiographic markers. There was significantly higher absolute postoperative LVEF in MVR‐C patients (p = 0.029). There was also significant worsening in LVEF (p = 0.0121) and GLS (p < 0.0001) after MVR‐P and not MVR‐C, suggesting no reduction in LV function post‐MVR‐C but a reduction post‐MVR‐P. There was significantly less postoperative worsening of GLS per patient in MVR‐C group as compared to the MVR‐P group (p = 0.023), indicating better preservation of LV function. There was also a smaller decline in LVEF per patient in the MVR‐C as compared to the MVR‐P group, although not statistically significant (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: MVR with complete preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus shows a favorable impact on the longitudinal function of the heart at 3 months. Further studies with larger patient numbers are indicated to investigate the long‐term results of this surgical approach. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-25 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10092726/ /pubmed/36284463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.17049 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiac Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Regular Issue Papers
Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa
Avci Demir, Fulya
Bleetman, David
Eskandari, Mehdi
Khan, Habib
Baghai, Max
Deshpande, Ranjit
Monaghan, Mark J.
Wendler, Olaf
The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement
title The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement
title_full The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement
title_fullStr The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement
title_full_unstemmed The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement
title_short The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement
title_sort impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement
topic Regular Issue Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.17049
work_keys_str_mv AT ngyinlingclarissa theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT avcidemirfulya theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT bleetmandavid theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT eskandarimehdi theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT khanhabib theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT baghaimax theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT deshpanderanjit theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT monaghanmarkj theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT wendlerolaf theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT ngyinlingclarissa impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT avcidemirfulya impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT bleetmandavid impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT eskandarimehdi impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT khanhabib impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT baghaimax impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT deshpanderanjit impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT monaghanmarkj impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement
AT wendlerolaf impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement