Cargando…
The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement
INTRODUCTION: In mitral valve replacement (MVR), sudden increases in afterload and disruption of the annular‐chordal‐papillary‐left‐ventricular wall causes left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the early postoperative period. Preservation of the posterior mitral leaflet apparatus (MVR‐P) has a favora...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.17049 |
_version_ | 1785023418046873600 |
---|---|
author | Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa Avci Demir, Fulya Bleetman, David Eskandari, Mehdi Khan, Habib Baghai, Max Deshpande, Ranjit Monaghan, Mark J. Wendler, Olaf |
author_facet | Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa Avci Demir, Fulya Bleetman, David Eskandari, Mehdi Khan, Habib Baghai, Max Deshpande, Ranjit Monaghan, Mark J. Wendler, Olaf |
author_sort | Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In mitral valve replacement (MVR), sudden increases in afterload and disruption of the annular‐chordal‐papillary‐left‐ventricular wall causes left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the early postoperative period. Preservation of the posterior mitral leaflet apparatus (MVR‐P) has a favorable outcome on LV function. However, there is paucity of data on the impact of complete preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus (MVR‐C). OBJECTIVE: We investigated the impact of MVR‐P and MVR‐C on baseline and 3‐months postoperative LV ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 29 MVR‐P and 19 MVR‐C patients with complete echocardiography data at our unit, who were operated between 2008 and 2017. Between‐group changes in LVEF and GLS were compared using independent sample T‐test. RESULTS: Median age was 59 years (IQR 50–69 years). Baseline LVEF was 58% (51%– 60%). Baseline GLS was −18.4 (−21.2 to −15.5). There were no significant between‐group differences between all baseline demographics and echocardiographic markers. There was significantly higher absolute postoperative LVEF in MVR‐C patients (p = 0.029). There was also significant worsening in LVEF (p = 0.0121) and GLS (p < 0.0001) after MVR‐P and not MVR‐C, suggesting no reduction in LV function post‐MVR‐C but a reduction post‐MVR‐P. There was significantly less postoperative worsening of GLS per patient in MVR‐C group as compared to the MVR‐P group (p = 0.023), indicating better preservation of LV function. There was also a smaller decline in LVEF per patient in the MVR‐C as compared to the MVR‐P group, although not statistically significant (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: MVR with complete preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus shows a favorable impact on the longitudinal function of the heart at 3 months. Further studies with larger patient numbers are indicated to investigate the long‐term results of this surgical approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100927262023-04-13 The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa Avci Demir, Fulya Bleetman, David Eskandari, Mehdi Khan, Habib Baghai, Max Deshpande, Ranjit Monaghan, Mark J. Wendler, Olaf J Card Surg Regular Issue Papers INTRODUCTION: In mitral valve replacement (MVR), sudden increases in afterload and disruption of the annular‐chordal‐papillary‐left‐ventricular wall causes left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the early postoperative period. Preservation of the posterior mitral leaflet apparatus (MVR‐P) has a favorable outcome on LV function. However, there is paucity of data on the impact of complete preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus (MVR‐C). OBJECTIVE: We investigated the impact of MVR‐P and MVR‐C on baseline and 3‐months postoperative LV ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 29 MVR‐P and 19 MVR‐C patients with complete echocardiography data at our unit, who were operated between 2008 and 2017. Between‐group changes in LVEF and GLS were compared using independent sample T‐test. RESULTS: Median age was 59 years (IQR 50–69 years). Baseline LVEF was 58% (51%– 60%). Baseline GLS was −18.4 (−21.2 to −15.5). There were no significant between‐group differences between all baseline demographics and echocardiographic markers. There was significantly higher absolute postoperative LVEF in MVR‐C patients (p = 0.029). There was also significant worsening in LVEF (p = 0.0121) and GLS (p < 0.0001) after MVR‐P and not MVR‐C, suggesting no reduction in LV function post‐MVR‐C but a reduction post‐MVR‐P. There was significantly less postoperative worsening of GLS per patient in MVR‐C group as compared to the MVR‐P group (p = 0.023), indicating better preservation of LV function. There was also a smaller decline in LVEF per patient in the MVR‐C as compared to the MVR‐P group, although not statistically significant (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: MVR with complete preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus shows a favorable impact on the longitudinal function of the heart at 3 months. Further studies with larger patient numbers are indicated to investigate the long‐term results of this surgical approach. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-25 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10092726/ /pubmed/36284463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.17049 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiac Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Regular Issue Papers Ng Yin Ling, Clarissa Avci Demir, Fulya Bleetman, David Eskandari, Mehdi Khan, Habib Baghai, Max Deshpande, Ranjit Monaghan, Mark J. Wendler, Olaf The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement |
title | The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement |
title_full | The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement |
title_fullStr | The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement |
title_short | The impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement |
title_sort | impact of complete versus partial preservation of the sub‐valvular apparatus on left ventricular function in mitral valve replacement |
topic | Regular Issue Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.17049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngyinlingclarissa theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT avcidemirfulya theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT bleetmandavid theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT eskandarimehdi theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT khanhabib theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT baghaimax theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT deshpanderanjit theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT monaghanmarkj theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT wendlerolaf theimpactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT ngyinlingclarissa impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT avcidemirfulya impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT bleetmandavid impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT eskandarimehdi impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT khanhabib impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT baghaimax impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT deshpanderanjit impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT monaghanmarkj impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement AT wendlerolaf impactofcompleteversuspartialpreservationofthesubvalvularapparatusonleftventricularfunctioninmitralvalvereplacement |