Cargando…
High‐resolution 3D forest structure explains ecomorphological trait variation in assemblages of saproxylic beetles
1. Climate, topography and the 3D structure of forests are major drivers affecting local species communities. However, little is known about how the specific functional traits of saproxylic (wood‐living) beetles, involved in the recycling of wood, might be affected by those environmental characteris...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14188 |
_version_ | 1785023434772709376 |
---|---|
author | Drag, Lukas Burner, Ryan C. Stephan, Jörg G. Birkemoe, Tone Doerfler, Inken Gossner, Martin M. Magdon, Paul Ovaskainen, Otso Potterf, Mária Schall, Peter Snäll, Tord Sverdrup‐Thygeson, Anne Weisser, Wolfgang Müller, Jörg |
author_facet | Drag, Lukas Burner, Ryan C. Stephan, Jörg G. Birkemoe, Tone Doerfler, Inken Gossner, Martin M. Magdon, Paul Ovaskainen, Otso Potterf, Mária Schall, Peter Snäll, Tord Sverdrup‐Thygeson, Anne Weisser, Wolfgang Müller, Jörg |
author_sort | Drag, Lukas |
collection | PubMed |
description | 1. Climate, topography and the 3D structure of forests are major drivers affecting local species communities. However, little is known about how the specific functional traits of saproxylic (wood‐living) beetles, involved in the recycling of wood, might be affected by those environmental characteristics. 2. Here, we combine ecological and morphological traits available for saproxylic beetles and airborne laser scanning (ALS) data in Bayesian trait‐based joint species distribution models to study how traits drive the distributions of more than 230 species in temperate forests of Europe. 3. We found that elevation (as a proxy for temperature and precipitation) and the proportion of conifers played important roles in species occurrences while variables related to habitat heterogeneity and forest complexity were less relevant. Furthermore, we showed that local communities were shaped by environmental variation primarily through their ecological traits whereas morphological traits were involved only marginally. As predicted, ecological traits influenced species' responses to forest structure, and to other environmental variation, with canopy niche, wood decay niche and host preference as the most important ecological traits. Conversely, no links between morphological traits and environmental characteristics were observed. Both models, however, revealed strong phylogenetic signal in species' response to environmental characteristics. 4. These findings imply that alterations of climate and tree species composition have the potential to alter saproxylic beetle communities in temperate forests. Additionally, ecological traits help explain species' responses to environmental characteristics and thus should prove useful in predicting their responses to future change. It remains challenging, however, to link simple morphological traits to species' complex ecological niches. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100928042023-04-13 High‐resolution 3D forest structure explains ecomorphological trait variation in assemblages of saproxylic beetles Drag, Lukas Burner, Ryan C. Stephan, Jörg G. Birkemoe, Tone Doerfler, Inken Gossner, Martin M. Magdon, Paul Ovaskainen, Otso Potterf, Mária Schall, Peter Snäll, Tord Sverdrup‐Thygeson, Anne Weisser, Wolfgang Müller, Jörg Funct Ecol RESEARCH ARTICLES 1. Climate, topography and the 3D structure of forests are major drivers affecting local species communities. However, little is known about how the specific functional traits of saproxylic (wood‐living) beetles, involved in the recycling of wood, might be affected by those environmental characteristics. 2. Here, we combine ecological and morphological traits available for saproxylic beetles and airborne laser scanning (ALS) data in Bayesian trait‐based joint species distribution models to study how traits drive the distributions of more than 230 species in temperate forests of Europe. 3. We found that elevation (as a proxy for temperature and precipitation) and the proportion of conifers played important roles in species occurrences while variables related to habitat heterogeneity and forest complexity were less relevant. Furthermore, we showed that local communities were shaped by environmental variation primarily through their ecological traits whereas morphological traits were involved only marginally. As predicted, ecological traits influenced species' responses to forest structure, and to other environmental variation, with canopy niche, wood decay niche and host preference as the most important ecological traits. Conversely, no links between morphological traits and environmental characteristics were observed. Both models, however, revealed strong phylogenetic signal in species' response to environmental characteristics. 4. These findings imply that alterations of climate and tree species composition have the potential to alter saproxylic beetle communities in temperate forests. Additionally, ecological traits help explain species' responses to environmental characteristics and thus should prove useful in predicting their responses to future change. It remains challenging, however, to link simple morphological traits to species' complex ecological niches. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-08 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10092804/ /pubmed/37064507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14188 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Drag, Lukas Burner, Ryan C. Stephan, Jörg G. Birkemoe, Tone Doerfler, Inken Gossner, Martin M. Magdon, Paul Ovaskainen, Otso Potterf, Mária Schall, Peter Snäll, Tord Sverdrup‐Thygeson, Anne Weisser, Wolfgang Müller, Jörg High‐resolution 3D forest structure explains ecomorphological trait variation in assemblages of saproxylic beetles |
title | High‐resolution 3D forest structure explains ecomorphological trait variation in assemblages of saproxylic beetles |
title_full | High‐resolution 3D forest structure explains ecomorphological trait variation in assemblages of saproxylic beetles |
title_fullStr | High‐resolution 3D forest structure explains ecomorphological trait variation in assemblages of saproxylic beetles |
title_full_unstemmed | High‐resolution 3D forest structure explains ecomorphological trait variation in assemblages of saproxylic beetles |
title_short | High‐resolution 3D forest structure explains ecomorphological trait variation in assemblages of saproxylic beetles |
title_sort | high‐resolution 3d forest structure explains ecomorphological trait variation in assemblages of saproxylic beetles |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT draglukas highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT burnerryanc highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT stephanjorgg highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT birkemoetone highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT doerflerinken highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT gossnermartinm highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT magdonpaul highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT ovaskainenotso highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT potterfmaria highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT schallpeter highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT snalltord highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT sverdrupthygesonanne highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT weisserwolfgang highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles AT mullerjorg highresolution3dforeststructureexplainsecomorphologicaltraitvariationinassemblagesofsaproxylicbeetles |