Cargando…
Lovo‐cel gene therapy for sickle cell disease: Treatment process evolution and outcomes in the initial groups of the HGB‐206 study
lovo‐cel (bb1111; LentiGlobin for sickle cell disease [SCD]) gene therapy (GT) comprises autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells transduced with the BB305 lentiviral vector encoding a modified β‐globin gene (β(A‐T87Q)) to produce anti‐sickling hemoglobin (HbA(T87Q)). Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26741 |
_version_ | 1785023444356694016 |
---|---|
author | Kanter, Julie Thompson, Alexis A. Pierciey, Francis J. Hsieh, Matthew Uchida, Naoya Leboulch, Philippe Schmidt, Manfred Bonner, Melissa Guo, Ruiting Miller, Alex Ribeil, Jean‐Antoine Davidson, David Asmal, Mohammed Walters, Mark C. Tisdale, John F. |
author_facet | Kanter, Julie Thompson, Alexis A. Pierciey, Francis J. Hsieh, Matthew Uchida, Naoya Leboulch, Philippe Schmidt, Manfred Bonner, Melissa Guo, Ruiting Miller, Alex Ribeil, Jean‐Antoine Davidson, David Asmal, Mohammed Walters, Mark C. Tisdale, John F. |
author_sort | Kanter, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | lovo‐cel (bb1111; LentiGlobin for sickle cell disease [SCD]) gene therapy (GT) comprises autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells transduced with the BB305 lentiviral vector encoding a modified β‐globin gene (β(A‐T87Q)) to produce anti‐sickling hemoglobin (HbA(T87Q)). The efficacy and safety of lovo‐cel for SCD are being evaluated in the ongoing phase 1/2 HGB‐206 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02140554). The treatment process evolved over time, using learnings from outcomes in the initial patients to optimize lovo‐cel's benefit–risk profile. Following modest expression of HbA(T87Q) in the initial patients (Group A, n = 7), alterations were made to the treatment process for patients subsequently enrolled in Group B (n = 2, patients B1 and B2), including improvements to cell collection and lovo‐cel manufacturing. After 6 months, median Group A peripheral blood vector copy number (≥0.08 c/dg) and HbA(T87Q) levels (≥0.46 g/dL) were inadequate for substantial clinical effect but stable and sustained over 5.5 years; both markedly improved in Group B (patient B1: ≥0.53 c/dg and ≥2.69 g/dL; patient B2: ≥2.14 c/dg and ≥6.40 g/dL, respectively) and generated improved biologic and clinical efficacy in Group B, including higher total hemoglobin and decreased hemolysis. The safety of the lovo‐cel for SCD treatment regimen largely reflected the known side effects of HSPC collection, busulfan conditioning regimen, and underlying SCD; acute myeloid leukemia was observed in two patients in Group A and deemed unlikely related to insertional oncogenesis. Changes made during development of the lovo‐cel treatment process were associated with improved outcomes and provide lessons for future SCD GT studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100928452023-04-13 Lovo‐cel gene therapy for sickle cell disease: Treatment process evolution and outcomes in the initial groups of the HGB‐206 study Kanter, Julie Thompson, Alexis A. Pierciey, Francis J. Hsieh, Matthew Uchida, Naoya Leboulch, Philippe Schmidt, Manfred Bonner, Melissa Guo, Ruiting Miller, Alex Ribeil, Jean‐Antoine Davidson, David Asmal, Mohammed Walters, Mark C. Tisdale, John F. Am J Hematol Research Articles lovo‐cel (bb1111; LentiGlobin for sickle cell disease [SCD]) gene therapy (GT) comprises autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells transduced with the BB305 lentiviral vector encoding a modified β‐globin gene (β(A‐T87Q)) to produce anti‐sickling hemoglobin (HbA(T87Q)). The efficacy and safety of lovo‐cel for SCD are being evaluated in the ongoing phase 1/2 HGB‐206 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02140554). The treatment process evolved over time, using learnings from outcomes in the initial patients to optimize lovo‐cel's benefit–risk profile. Following modest expression of HbA(T87Q) in the initial patients (Group A, n = 7), alterations were made to the treatment process for patients subsequently enrolled in Group B (n = 2, patients B1 and B2), including improvements to cell collection and lovo‐cel manufacturing. After 6 months, median Group A peripheral blood vector copy number (≥0.08 c/dg) and HbA(T87Q) levels (≥0.46 g/dL) were inadequate for substantial clinical effect but stable and sustained over 5.5 years; both markedly improved in Group B (patient B1: ≥0.53 c/dg and ≥2.69 g/dL; patient B2: ≥2.14 c/dg and ≥6.40 g/dL, respectively) and generated improved biologic and clinical efficacy in Group B, including higher total hemoglobin and decreased hemolysis. The safety of the lovo‐cel for SCD treatment regimen largely reflected the known side effects of HSPC collection, busulfan conditioning regimen, and underlying SCD; acute myeloid leukemia was observed in two patients in Group A and deemed unlikely related to insertional oncogenesis. Changes made during development of the lovo‐cel treatment process were associated with improved outcomes and provide lessons for future SCD GT studies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-10 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10092845/ /pubmed/36161320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26741 Text en © 2022 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Kanter, Julie Thompson, Alexis A. Pierciey, Francis J. Hsieh, Matthew Uchida, Naoya Leboulch, Philippe Schmidt, Manfred Bonner, Melissa Guo, Ruiting Miller, Alex Ribeil, Jean‐Antoine Davidson, David Asmal, Mohammed Walters, Mark C. Tisdale, John F. Lovo‐cel gene therapy for sickle cell disease: Treatment process evolution and outcomes in the initial groups of the HGB‐206 study |
title | Lovo‐cel gene therapy for sickle cell disease: Treatment process evolution and outcomes in the initial groups of the HGB‐206 study |
title_full | Lovo‐cel gene therapy for sickle cell disease: Treatment process evolution and outcomes in the initial groups of the HGB‐206 study |
title_fullStr | Lovo‐cel gene therapy for sickle cell disease: Treatment process evolution and outcomes in the initial groups of the HGB‐206 study |
title_full_unstemmed | Lovo‐cel gene therapy for sickle cell disease: Treatment process evolution and outcomes in the initial groups of the HGB‐206 study |
title_short | Lovo‐cel gene therapy for sickle cell disease: Treatment process evolution and outcomes in the initial groups of the HGB‐206 study |
title_sort | lovo‐cel gene therapy for sickle cell disease: treatment process evolution and outcomes in the initial groups of the hgb‐206 study |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanterjulie lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT thompsonalexisa lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT piercieyfrancisj lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT hsiehmatthew lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT uchidanaoya lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT leboulchphilippe lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT schmidtmanfred lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT bonnermelissa lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT guoruiting lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT milleralex lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT ribeiljeanantoine lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT davidsondavid lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT asmalmohammed lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT waltersmarkc lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study AT tisdalejohnf lovocelgenetherapyforsicklecelldiseasetreatmentprocessevolutionandoutcomesintheinitialgroupsofthehgb206study |