Cargando…
A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study)
BACKGROUND: Although leg ulcers are a burdensome disease most common in those aged 65 years and older, frailty in this population has not yet been well established. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively explore and compare the presence of frailty in elderly patients with chronic leg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36152005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18586 |
_version_ | 1785023448614961152 |
---|---|
author | Zorge, Nadja E. Scheerders, Eveline R. Y. Dudink, Koen Oudshoorn, Christian Polinder‐Bos, Harmke A. Waalboer‐Spuij, Rick Schlejen, Peter M. van Montfrans, Catherine |
author_facet | Zorge, Nadja E. Scheerders, Eveline R. Y. Dudink, Koen Oudshoorn, Christian Polinder‐Bos, Harmke A. Waalboer‐Spuij, Rick Schlejen, Peter M. van Montfrans, Catherine |
author_sort | Zorge, Nadja E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although leg ulcers are a burdensome disease most common in those aged 65 years and older, frailty in this population has not yet been well established. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively explore and compare the presence of frailty in elderly patients with chronic leg or foot ulcers by applying different validated frailty screening methods in three healthcare settings and to assess the feasibility of frailty screening. METHODS: We compared frailty of leg ulcer patients referred to an academic hospital with a non‐academic hospital, leg ulcer patients receiving (primary) homecare, and a dermato‐oncology patient population (control group). Frailty and quality of life were assessed using four validated questionnaires: the Groninger Frailty Indicator, Geriatric‐8, Mini‐Cog and Wound Quality of Life. To analyse data multiple (non)‐parametric tests were performed. RESULTS: Fifty of 60 included leg ulcer patients (83%) scored “frail” on at least one frailty questionnaire (GFI, G8 or Mini‐Cog). The number of patients scoring “frail” on two or three out of three applied frailty questionnaires were significantly higher in the academic and homecare ulcer population compared with the non‐academic ulcer population and control group (p = 0.002). In the academic ulcer population mean Wound Quality of Life scores were 30.2 (SD 17.6), compared with 17.7 (SD 13.1) in the non‐academic and 15.0 (SD 10.4) in the homecare ulcer population (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients suffering from leg ulcers in this study was frail. The highest frailty prevalence was observed in the academic and homecare ulcer populations. The largest impaired quality of life was reported in the academic ulcer population. In dermatology practice, implementing frailty screening and initiating appropriate (paramedical) supportive care should be considered to improve patient outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100928662023-04-13 A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study) Zorge, Nadja E. Scheerders, Eveline R. Y. Dudink, Koen Oudshoorn, Christian Polinder‐Bos, Harmke A. Waalboer‐Spuij, Rick Schlejen, Peter M. van Montfrans, Catherine J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Original Articles and Short Reports BACKGROUND: Although leg ulcers are a burdensome disease most common in those aged 65 years and older, frailty in this population has not yet been well established. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively explore and compare the presence of frailty in elderly patients with chronic leg or foot ulcers by applying different validated frailty screening methods in three healthcare settings and to assess the feasibility of frailty screening. METHODS: We compared frailty of leg ulcer patients referred to an academic hospital with a non‐academic hospital, leg ulcer patients receiving (primary) homecare, and a dermato‐oncology patient population (control group). Frailty and quality of life were assessed using four validated questionnaires: the Groninger Frailty Indicator, Geriatric‐8, Mini‐Cog and Wound Quality of Life. To analyse data multiple (non)‐parametric tests were performed. RESULTS: Fifty of 60 included leg ulcer patients (83%) scored “frail” on at least one frailty questionnaire (GFI, G8 or Mini‐Cog). The number of patients scoring “frail” on two or three out of three applied frailty questionnaires were significantly higher in the academic and homecare ulcer population compared with the non‐academic ulcer population and control group (p = 0.002). In the academic ulcer population mean Wound Quality of Life scores were 30.2 (SD 17.6), compared with 17.7 (SD 13.1) in the non‐academic and 15.0 (SD 10.4) in the homecare ulcer population (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients suffering from leg ulcers in this study was frail. The highest frailty prevalence was observed in the academic and homecare ulcer populations. The largest impaired quality of life was reported in the academic ulcer population. In dermatology practice, implementing frailty screening and initiating appropriate (paramedical) supportive care should be considered to improve patient outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-14 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10092866/ /pubmed/36152005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18586 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles and Short Reports Zorge, Nadja E. Scheerders, Eveline R. Y. Dudink, Koen Oudshoorn, Christian Polinder‐Bos, Harmke A. Waalboer‐Spuij, Rick Schlejen, Peter M. van Montfrans, Catherine A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study) |
title | A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study) |
title_full | A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study) |
title_fullStr | A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study) |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study) |
title_short | A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study) |
title_sort | prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (geras study) |
topic | Original Articles and Short Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36152005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zorgenadjae aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT scheerdersevelinery aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT dudinkkoen aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT oudshoornchristian aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT polinderbosharmkea aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT waalboerspuijrick aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT schlejenpeterm aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT vanmontfranscatherine aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT zorgenadjae prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT scheerdersevelinery prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT dudinkkoen prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT oudshoornchristian prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT polinderbosharmkea prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT waalboerspuijrick prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT schlejenpeterm prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy AT vanmontfranscatherine prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy |