Cargando…

A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study)

BACKGROUND: Although leg ulcers are a burdensome disease most common in those aged 65 years and older, frailty in this population has not yet been well established. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively explore and compare the presence of frailty in elderly patients with chronic leg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zorge, Nadja E., Scheerders, Eveline R. Y., Dudink, Koen, Oudshoorn, Christian, Polinder‐Bos, Harmke A., Waalboer‐Spuij, Rick, Schlejen, Peter M., van Montfrans, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36152005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18586
_version_ 1785023448614961152
author Zorge, Nadja E.
Scheerders, Eveline R. Y.
Dudink, Koen
Oudshoorn, Christian
Polinder‐Bos, Harmke A.
Waalboer‐Spuij, Rick
Schlejen, Peter M.
van Montfrans, Catherine
author_facet Zorge, Nadja E.
Scheerders, Eveline R. Y.
Dudink, Koen
Oudshoorn, Christian
Polinder‐Bos, Harmke A.
Waalboer‐Spuij, Rick
Schlejen, Peter M.
van Montfrans, Catherine
author_sort Zorge, Nadja E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although leg ulcers are a burdensome disease most common in those aged 65 years and older, frailty in this population has not yet been well established. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively explore and compare the presence of frailty in elderly patients with chronic leg or foot ulcers by applying different validated frailty screening methods in three healthcare settings and to assess the feasibility of frailty screening. METHODS: We compared frailty of leg ulcer patients referred to an academic hospital with a non‐academic hospital, leg ulcer patients receiving (primary) homecare, and a dermato‐oncology patient population (control group). Frailty and quality of life were assessed using four validated questionnaires: the Groninger Frailty Indicator, Geriatric‐8, Mini‐Cog and Wound Quality of Life. To analyse data multiple (non)‐parametric tests were performed. RESULTS: Fifty of 60 included leg ulcer patients (83%) scored “frail” on at least one frailty questionnaire (GFI, G8 or Mini‐Cog). The number of patients scoring “frail” on two or three out of three applied frailty questionnaires were significantly higher in the academic and homecare ulcer population compared with the non‐academic ulcer population and control group (p = 0.002). In the academic ulcer population mean Wound Quality of Life scores were 30.2 (SD 17.6), compared with 17.7 (SD 13.1) in the non‐academic and 15.0 (SD 10.4) in the homecare ulcer population (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients suffering from leg ulcers in this study was frail. The highest frailty prevalence was observed in the academic and homecare ulcer populations. The largest impaired quality of life was reported in the academic ulcer population. In dermatology practice, implementing frailty screening and initiating appropriate (paramedical) supportive care should be considered to improve patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100928662023-04-13 A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study) Zorge, Nadja E. Scheerders, Eveline R. Y. Dudink, Koen Oudshoorn, Christian Polinder‐Bos, Harmke A. Waalboer‐Spuij, Rick Schlejen, Peter M. van Montfrans, Catherine J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Original Articles and Short Reports BACKGROUND: Although leg ulcers are a burdensome disease most common in those aged 65 years and older, frailty in this population has not yet been well established. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively explore and compare the presence of frailty in elderly patients with chronic leg or foot ulcers by applying different validated frailty screening methods in three healthcare settings and to assess the feasibility of frailty screening. METHODS: We compared frailty of leg ulcer patients referred to an academic hospital with a non‐academic hospital, leg ulcer patients receiving (primary) homecare, and a dermato‐oncology patient population (control group). Frailty and quality of life were assessed using four validated questionnaires: the Groninger Frailty Indicator, Geriatric‐8, Mini‐Cog and Wound Quality of Life. To analyse data multiple (non)‐parametric tests were performed. RESULTS: Fifty of 60 included leg ulcer patients (83%) scored “frail” on at least one frailty questionnaire (GFI, G8 or Mini‐Cog). The number of patients scoring “frail” on two or three out of three applied frailty questionnaires were significantly higher in the academic and homecare ulcer population compared with the non‐academic ulcer population and control group (p = 0.002). In the academic ulcer population mean Wound Quality of Life scores were 30.2 (SD 17.6), compared with 17.7 (SD 13.1) in the non‐academic and 15.0 (SD 10.4) in the homecare ulcer population (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients suffering from leg ulcers in this study was frail. The highest frailty prevalence was observed in the academic and homecare ulcer populations. The largest impaired quality of life was reported in the academic ulcer population. In dermatology practice, implementing frailty screening and initiating appropriate (paramedical) supportive care should be considered to improve patient outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-14 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10092866/ /pubmed/36152005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18586 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles and Short Reports
Zorge, Nadja E.
Scheerders, Eveline R. Y.
Dudink, Koen
Oudshoorn, Christian
Polinder‐Bos, Harmke A.
Waalboer‐Spuij, Rick
Schlejen, Peter M.
van Montfrans, Catherine
A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study)
title A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study)
title_full A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study)
title_fullStr A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study)
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study)
title_short A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study)
title_sort prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (geras study)
topic Original Articles and Short Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36152005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18586
work_keys_str_mv AT zorgenadjae aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT scheerdersevelinery aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT dudinkkoen aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT oudshoornchristian aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT polinderbosharmkea aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT waalboerspuijrick aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT schlejenpeterm aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT vanmontfranscatherine aprospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT zorgenadjae prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT scheerdersevelinery prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT dudinkkoen prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT oudshoornchristian prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT polinderbosharmkea prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT waalboerspuijrick prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT schlejenpeterm prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy
AT vanmontfranscatherine prospectivemulticentrestudytoassessfrailtyinelderlypatientswithlegulcersgerasstudy