Cargando…

Non-Laboratory-Based Risk Prediction Tools for Undiagnosed Pre-Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Early detection of pre-diabetes (pre-DM) can prevent DM and related complications. This review examined studies on non-laboratory-based pre-DM risk prediction tools to identify important predictors and evaluate their performance. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL were searched in February 2023. Studie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Will Ho-Gi, Mi, Yuqi, Dong, Weinan, Tse, Emily Tsui-Yee, Wong, Carlos King-Ho, Bedford, Laura Elizabeth, Lam, Cindy Lo-Kuen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071294
_version_ 1785023545219219456
author Cheng, Will Ho-Gi
Mi, Yuqi
Dong, Weinan
Tse, Emily Tsui-Yee
Wong, Carlos King-Ho
Bedford, Laura Elizabeth
Lam, Cindy Lo-Kuen
author_facet Cheng, Will Ho-Gi
Mi, Yuqi
Dong, Weinan
Tse, Emily Tsui-Yee
Wong, Carlos King-Ho
Bedford, Laura Elizabeth
Lam, Cindy Lo-Kuen
author_sort Cheng, Will Ho-Gi
collection PubMed
description Early detection of pre-diabetes (pre-DM) can prevent DM and related complications. This review examined studies on non-laboratory-based pre-DM risk prediction tools to identify important predictors and evaluate their performance. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL were searched in February 2023. Studies that developed tools with: (1) pre-DM as a prediction outcome, (2) fasting/post-prandial blood glucose/HbA1c as outcome measures, and (3) non-laboratory predictors only were included. The studies’ quality was assessed using the CASP Clinical Prediction Rule Checklist. Data on pre-DM definitions, predictors, validation methods, performances of the tools were extracted for narrative synthesis. A total of 6398 titles were identified and screened. Twenty-four studies were included with satisfactory quality. Eight studies (33.3%) developed pre-DM risk tools and sixteen studies (66.7%) focused on pre-DM and DM risks. Age, family history of DM, diagnosed hypertension and obesity measured by BMI and/or WC were the most common non-laboratory predictors. Existing tools showed satisfactory internal discrimination (AUROC: 0.68–0.82), sensitivity (0.60–0.89), and specificity (0.50–0.74). Only twelve studies (50.0%) had validated their tools externally, with a variance in the external discrimination (AUROC: 0.31–0.79) and sensitivity (0.31–0.92). Most non-laboratory-based risk tools for pre-DM detection showed satisfactory performance in their study populations. The generalisability of these tools was unclear since most lacked external validation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10093270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100932702023-04-13 Non-Laboratory-Based Risk Prediction Tools for Undiagnosed Pre-Diabetes: A Systematic Review Cheng, Will Ho-Gi Mi, Yuqi Dong, Weinan Tse, Emily Tsui-Yee Wong, Carlos King-Ho Bedford, Laura Elizabeth Lam, Cindy Lo-Kuen Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review Early detection of pre-diabetes (pre-DM) can prevent DM and related complications. This review examined studies on non-laboratory-based pre-DM risk prediction tools to identify important predictors and evaluate their performance. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL were searched in February 2023. Studies that developed tools with: (1) pre-DM as a prediction outcome, (2) fasting/post-prandial blood glucose/HbA1c as outcome measures, and (3) non-laboratory predictors only were included. The studies’ quality was assessed using the CASP Clinical Prediction Rule Checklist. Data on pre-DM definitions, predictors, validation methods, performances of the tools were extracted for narrative synthesis. A total of 6398 titles were identified and screened. Twenty-four studies were included with satisfactory quality. Eight studies (33.3%) developed pre-DM risk tools and sixteen studies (66.7%) focused on pre-DM and DM risks. Age, family history of DM, diagnosed hypertension and obesity measured by BMI and/or WC were the most common non-laboratory predictors. Existing tools showed satisfactory internal discrimination (AUROC: 0.68–0.82), sensitivity (0.60–0.89), and specificity (0.50–0.74). Only twelve studies (50.0%) had validated their tools externally, with a variance in the external discrimination (AUROC: 0.31–0.79) and sensitivity (0.31–0.92). Most non-laboratory-based risk tools for pre-DM detection showed satisfactory performance in their study populations. The generalisability of these tools was unclear since most lacked external validation. MDPI 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10093270/ /pubmed/37046512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071294 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Cheng, Will Ho-Gi
Mi, Yuqi
Dong, Weinan
Tse, Emily Tsui-Yee
Wong, Carlos King-Ho
Bedford, Laura Elizabeth
Lam, Cindy Lo-Kuen
Non-Laboratory-Based Risk Prediction Tools for Undiagnosed Pre-Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title Non-Laboratory-Based Risk Prediction Tools for Undiagnosed Pre-Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title_full Non-Laboratory-Based Risk Prediction Tools for Undiagnosed Pre-Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Non-Laboratory-Based Risk Prediction Tools for Undiagnosed Pre-Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Non-Laboratory-Based Risk Prediction Tools for Undiagnosed Pre-Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title_short Non-Laboratory-Based Risk Prediction Tools for Undiagnosed Pre-Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title_sort non-laboratory-based risk prediction tools for undiagnosed pre-diabetes: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071294
work_keys_str_mv AT chengwillhogi nonlaboratorybasedriskpredictiontoolsforundiagnosedprediabetesasystematicreview
AT miyuqi nonlaboratorybasedriskpredictiontoolsforundiagnosedprediabetesasystematicreview
AT dongweinan nonlaboratorybasedriskpredictiontoolsforundiagnosedprediabetesasystematicreview
AT tseemilytsuiyee nonlaboratorybasedriskpredictiontoolsforundiagnosedprediabetesasystematicreview
AT wongcarloskingho nonlaboratorybasedriskpredictiontoolsforundiagnosedprediabetesasystematicreview
AT bedfordlauraelizabeth nonlaboratorybasedriskpredictiontoolsforundiagnosedprediabetesasystematicreview
AT lamcindylokuen nonlaboratorybasedriskpredictiontoolsforundiagnosedprediabetesasystematicreview