Cargando…

Rural–Urban Disparities in Patient Care Experiences among Prostate Cancer Survivors: A SEER-CAHPS Study

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Rural residence has been associated with poor access to healthcare and accordingly lower odds of receiving definitive treatment. Patient care experiences are important indicators of the quality of care delivered and are highly valued by patients. Although rural–urban disparities in p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandit, Ambrish A., Patil, Nilesh N., Mostafa, Mostafa, Kamel, Mohamed, Halpern, Michael T., Li, Chenghui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046601
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15071939
_version_ 1785023552135626752
author Pandit, Ambrish A.
Patil, Nilesh N.
Mostafa, Mostafa
Kamel, Mohamed
Halpern, Michael T.
Li, Chenghui
author_facet Pandit, Ambrish A.
Patil, Nilesh N.
Mostafa, Mostafa
Kamel, Mohamed
Halpern, Michael T.
Li, Chenghui
author_sort Pandit, Ambrish A.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Rural residence has been associated with poor access to healthcare and accordingly lower odds of receiving definitive treatment. Patient care experiences are important indicators of the quality of care delivered and are highly valued by patients. Although rural–urban disparities in prostate cancer care are evident, it is unknown how these disparities are associated with PCEs among PCa survivors. In this retrospective cohort study, which included 3379 older PCa survivors at intermediate-to-high risk of disease progression, we evaluated the rural–urban differences in patient care experiences according to receipt of definitive treatment. We found rural PCa survivors were less likely to receive treatment. Treated rural PCa survivors reported better access to care, while untreated rural PCa survivors reported poorer care access and experiences compared to their large metro counterparts. We also explored rural–urban disparities in receipt of definitive treatment across different geographic regions. This study highlights the importance of conducting subgroup analysis to uncover any important heterogeneous care experiences among cancer survivors. ABSTRACT: Background: We sought to evaluate rural–urban disparities in patient care experiences (PCEs) among localized prostate cancer (PCa) survivors at intermediate-to-high risk of disease progression. Methods: Using 2007–2015 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data linked to Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys, we analyzed survivors’ first survey ≥6 months post-diagnosis. Covariate adjusted linear regressions were used to estimate associations of treatment status (definitive treatment vs. none) and residence (large metro vs. metro vs. rural) with PCE composite and rating measures. Results: Among 3779 PCa survivors, 1798 (53.2%) and 370 (10.9%) resided in large metro and rural areas, respectively; more rural (vs. large metro) residents were untreated (21.9% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.017). Untreated (vs. treated) PCa survivors reported lower scores for doctor communication (ß = −2.0; p = 0.022), specialist rating (ß = −2.5; p = 0.008), and overall care rating (ß = −2.4; p = 0.006). While treated rural survivors gave higher (ß = 3.6; p = 0.022) scores for obtaining needed care, untreated rural survivors gave lower scores for obtaining needed care (ß = −7.0; p = 0.017) and a lower health plan rating (ß = −7.9; p = 0.003) compared to their respective counterparts in large metro areas. Conclusions: Rural PCa survivors are less likely to receive treatment. Rural–urban differences in PCEs varied by treatment status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10093298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100932982023-04-13 Rural–Urban Disparities in Patient Care Experiences among Prostate Cancer Survivors: A SEER-CAHPS Study Pandit, Ambrish A. Patil, Nilesh N. Mostafa, Mostafa Kamel, Mohamed Halpern, Michael T. Li, Chenghui Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Rural residence has been associated with poor access to healthcare and accordingly lower odds of receiving definitive treatment. Patient care experiences are important indicators of the quality of care delivered and are highly valued by patients. Although rural–urban disparities in prostate cancer care are evident, it is unknown how these disparities are associated with PCEs among PCa survivors. In this retrospective cohort study, which included 3379 older PCa survivors at intermediate-to-high risk of disease progression, we evaluated the rural–urban differences in patient care experiences according to receipt of definitive treatment. We found rural PCa survivors were less likely to receive treatment. Treated rural PCa survivors reported better access to care, while untreated rural PCa survivors reported poorer care access and experiences compared to their large metro counterparts. We also explored rural–urban disparities in receipt of definitive treatment across different geographic regions. This study highlights the importance of conducting subgroup analysis to uncover any important heterogeneous care experiences among cancer survivors. ABSTRACT: Background: We sought to evaluate rural–urban disparities in patient care experiences (PCEs) among localized prostate cancer (PCa) survivors at intermediate-to-high risk of disease progression. Methods: Using 2007–2015 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data linked to Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys, we analyzed survivors’ first survey ≥6 months post-diagnosis. Covariate adjusted linear regressions were used to estimate associations of treatment status (definitive treatment vs. none) and residence (large metro vs. metro vs. rural) with PCE composite and rating measures. Results: Among 3779 PCa survivors, 1798 (53.2%) and 370 (10.9%) resided in large metro and rural areas, respectively; more rural (vs. large metro) residents were untreated (21.9% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.017). Untreated (vs. treated) PCa survivors reported lower scores for doctor communication (ß = −2.0; p = 0.022), specialist rating (ß = −2.5; p = 0.008), and overall care rating (ß = −2.4; p = 0.006). While treated rural survivors gave higher (ß = 3.6; p = 0.022) scores for obtaining needed care, untreated rural survivors gave lower scores for obtaining needed care (ß = −7.0; p = 0.017) and a lower health plan rating (ß = −7.9; p = 0.003) compared to their respective counterparts in large metro areas. Conclusions: Rural PCa survivors are less likely to receive treatment. Rural–urban differences in PCEs varied by treatment status. MDPI 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10093298/ /pubmed/37046601 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15071939 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pandit, Ambrish A.
Patil, Nilesh N.
Mostafa, Mostafa
Kamel, Mohamed
Halpern, Michael T.
Li, Chenghui
Rural–Urban Disparities in Patient Care Experiences among Prostate Cancer Survivors: A SEER-CAHPS Study
title Rural–Urban Disparities in Patient Care Experiences among Prostate Cancer Survivors: A SEER-CAHPS Study
title_full Rural–Urban Disparities in Patient Care Experiences among Prostate Cancer Survivors: A SEER-CAHPS Study
title_fullStr Rural–Urban Disparities in Patient Care Experiences among Prostate Cancer Survivors: A SEER-CAHPS Study
title_full_unstemmed Rural–Urban Disparities in Patient Care Experiences among Prostate Cancer Survivors: A SEER-CAHPS Study
title_short Rural–Urban Disparities in Patient Care Experiences among Prostate Cancer Survivors: A SEER-CAHPS Study
title_sort rural–urban disparities in patient care experiences among prostate cancer survivors: a seer-cahps study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046601
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15071939
work_keys_str_mv AT panditambrisha ruralurbandisparitiesinpatientcareexperiencesamongprostatecancersurvivorsaseercahpsstudy
AT patilnileshn ruralurbandisparitiesinpatientcareexperiencesamongprostatecancersurvivorsaseercahpsstudy
AT mostafamostafa ruralurbandisparitiesinpatientcareexperiencesamongprostatecancersurvivorsaseercahpsstudy
AT kamelmohamed ruralurbandisparitiesinpatientcareexperiencesamongprostatecancersurvivorsaseercahpsstudy
AT halpernmichaelt ruralurbandisparitiesinpatientcareexperiencesamongprostatecancersurvivorsaseercahpsstudy
AT lichenghui ruralurbandisparitiesinpatientcareexperiencesamongprostatecancersurvivorsaseercahpsstudy