Surgical Approach to Liver Metastases in GEP-NET in a Tertiary Reference Center

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The choice of the surgical and therapeutic approach for patients suffering from neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) plays a central role in the therapeutic strategy. Whilst debulking surgery is widely accepted as an alternative approach for eligible patients, its prognostic influence remains a point of discussion. With the advent of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS), its applicability for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors has scarcely been described. Here, we aimed to investigate different surgical strategies in the multimodal treatment of NELM, including minimally invasive approaches. Tumor debulking showed comparable survival outcomes to curative intended liver surgery, and MILS was not inferior to open liver surgery in terms of survival rates and as such should be recommended also in patients with NELM. ABSTRACT: Indications for liver resection in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) vary from liver resection with curative intent to tumor debulking or tissue sampling for histopathological characterization. With increasing expertise, the number of minimally invasive liver surgeries (MILS) in GEP-NET patients has increased. However, the influence on the oncological outcome has hardly been described. The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent liver resection for hepatic metastases of GEP-NET at the Department of Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare MILS with open liver surgery (OLS). In total, 22 patients underwent liver surgery with curative intent, and 30 debulking surgeries were analyzed. Disease-free survival (DFS) was longer than progression-free survival (PFS) (10 vs. 24 months), whereas overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly (p = 0.588). Thirty-nine (75%) liver resections were performed as OLS, and thirteen (25%) as MILS. After PSM, a shorter length of hospital stay was found for the MILS group (14 vs. 10 d, p = 0.034), while neither DFS/PFS nor OS differed significantly. Both curative intended and cytoreductive resection of hepatic GEP-NET metastases achieved excellent outcomes. MILS led to a reduced length of hospital, while preserving a good oncological outcome.