Cargando…

Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is usually performed through a femoral vascular access using 6–9 Fr guiding catheters. We investigated whether a systematic distal radial approach using 5 Fr guiding sheaths was a safe and effective alternative to transfemoral approach for CAS. From July 2020 to October...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Gioia, Giuseppe, Salemme, Luigi, Ferrone, Marco, Cioppa, Angelo, Popusoi, Grigore, Pucciarelli, Armando, Verdoliva, Sebastiano, Franzese, Michele, Marga, Simion, Barbato, Emanuele, Tesorio, Tullio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046483
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071266
_version_ 1785023623786921984
author Di Gioia, Giuseppe
Salemme, Luigi
Ferrone, Marco
Cioppa, Angelo
Popusoi, Grigore
Pucciarelli, Armando
Verdoliva, Sebastiano
Franzese, Michele
Marga, Simion
Barbato, Emanuele
Tesorio, Tullio
author_facet Di Gioia, Giuseppe
Salemme, Luigi
Ferrone, Marco
Cioppa, Angelo
Popusoi, Grigore
Pucciarelli, Armando
Verdoliva, Sebastiano
Franzese, Michele
Marga, Simion
Barbato, Emanuele
Tesorio, Tullio
author_sort Di Gioia, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is usually performed through a femoral vascular access using 6–9 Fr guiding catheters. We investigated whether a systematic distal radial approach using 5 Fr guiding sheaths was a safe and effective alternative to transfemoral approach for CAS. From July 2020 to October 2022, two operators at our center systematically performed CAS using a 5 Fr distal radial approach in consecutive patients. The main endpoints of the study were procedural success via distal radial and via proximal or distal radial access. The learning curve was evaluated by comparing the first half of patients versus the second half of patients enrolled. Procedural data and 30-day clinical outcomes were collected. Fifty-one patients were prospectively enrolled. CAS was effectively performed via distal radial access in 45 patients (88%). Overall radial artery success was 92%. Distal radial CAS was successfully performed in 20 out of the first 25 patients enrolled (80%), and in 25 of the last 26 patients enrolled (96%; p = 0.07). Significantly less contrast was administered in the last 26 patients compared to the first 25 enrolled (110 (70, 140) mL vs. 120 (107, 150) mL; p = 0.045). Radial artery occlusion was reported in 1 patient (2%). Only 1 minor stroke (2%) was reported in-hospital and at 30-day follow-up. In conclusion, distal radial CAS using 5 Fr catheters was a safe procedure with a high success rate. The procedure had a relatively short learning curve in operators familiar with transfemoral CAS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10093593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100935932023-04-13 Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access Di Gioia, Giuseppe Salemme, Luigi Ferrone, Marco Cioppa, Angelo Popusoi, Grigore Pucciarelli, Armando Verdoliva, Sebastiano Franzese, Michele Marga, Simion Barbato, Emanuele Tesorio, Tullio Diagnostics (Basel) Article Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is usually performed through a femoral vascular access using 6–9 Fr guiding catheters. We investigated whether a systematic distal radial approach using 5 Fr guiding sheaths was a safe and effective alternative to transfemoral approach for CAS. From July 2020 to October 2022, two operators at our center systematically performed CAS using a 5 Fr distal radial approach in consecutive patients. The main endpoints of the study were procedural success via distal radial and via proximal or distal radial access. The learning curve was evaluated by comparing the first half of patients versus the second half of patients enrolled. Procedural data and 30-day clinical outcomes were collected. Fifty-one patients were prospectively enrolled. CAS was effectively performed via distal radial access in 45 patients (88%). Overall radial artery success was 92%. Distal radial CAS was successfully performed in 20 out of the first 25 patients enrolled (80%), and in 25 of the last 26 patients enrolled (96%; p = 0.07). Significantly less contrast was administered in the last 26 patients compared to the first 25 enrolled (110 (70, 140) mL vs. 120 (107, 150) mL; p = 0.045). Radial artery occlusion was reported in 1 patient (2%). Only 1 minor stroke (2%) was reported in-hospital and at 30-day follow-up. In conclusion, distal radial CAS using 5 Fr catheters was a safe procedure with a high success rate. The procedure had a relatively short learning curve in operators familiar with transfemoral CAS. MDPI 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10093593/ /pubmed/37046483 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071266 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Di Gioia, Giuseppe
Salemme, Luigi
Ferrone, Marco
Cioppa, Angelo
Popusoi, Grigore
Pucciarelli, Armando
Verdoliva, Sebastiano
Franzese, Michele
Marga, Simion
Barbato, Emanuele
Tesorio, Tullio
Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access
title Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access
title_full Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access
title_fullStr Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access
title_full_unstemmed Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access
title_short Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access
title_sort carotid artery stenting using five-french distal radial vascular access
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046483
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071266
work_keys_str_mv AT digioiagiuseppe carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess
AT salemmeluigi carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess
AT ferronemarco carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess
AT cioppaangelo carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess
AT popusoigrigore carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess
AT pucciarelliarmando carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess
AT verdolivasebastiano carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess
AT franzesemichele carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess
AT margasimion carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess
AT barbatoemanuele carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess
AT tesoriotullio carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess