Cargando…
Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is usually performed through a femoral vascular access using 6–9 Fr guiding catheters. We investigated whether a systematic distal radial approach using 5 Fr guiding sheaths was a safe and effective alternative to transfemoral approach for CAS. From July 2020 to October...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046483 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071266 |
_version_ | 1785023623786921984 |
---|---|
author | Di Gioia, Giuseppe Salemme, Luigi Ferrone, Marco Cioppa, Angelo Popusoi, Grigore Pucciarelli, Armando Verdoliva, Sebastiano Franzese, Michele Marga, Simion Barbato, Emanuele Tesorio, Tullio |
author_facet | Di Gioia, Giuseppe Salemme, Luigi Ferrone, Marco Cioppa, Angelo Popusoi, Grigore Pucciarelli, Armando Verdoliva, Sebastiano Franzese, Michele Marga, Simion Barbato, Emanuele Tesorio, Tullio |
author_sort | Di Gioia, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is usually performed through a femoral vascular access using 6–9 Fr guiding catheters. We investigated whether a systematic distal radial approach using 5 Fr guiding sheaths was a safe and effective alternative to transfemoral approach for CAS. From July 2020 to October 2022, two operators at our center systematically performed CAS using a 5 Fr distal radial approach in consecutive patients. The main endpoints of the study were procedural success via distal radial and via proximal or distal radial access. The learning curve was evaluated by comparing the first half of patients versus the second half of patients enrolled. Procedural data and 30-day clinical outcomes were collected. Fifty-one patients were prospectively enrolled. CAS was effectively performed via distal radial access in 45 patients (88%). Overall radial artery success was 92%. Distal radial CAS was successfully performed in 20 out of the first 25 patients enrolled (80%), and in 25 of the last 26 patients enrolled (96%; p = 0.07). Significantly less contrast was administered in the last 26 patients compared to the first 25 enrolled (110 (70, 140) mL vs. 120 (107, 150) mL; p = 0.045). Radial artery occlusion was reported in 1 patient (2%). Only 1 minor stroke (2%) was reported in-hospital and at 30-day follow-up. In conclusion, distal radial CAS using 5 Fr catheters was a safe procedure with a high success rate. The procedure had a relatively short learning curve in operators familiar with transfemoral CAS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10093593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100935932023-04-13 Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access Di Gioia, Giuseppe Salemme, Luigi Ferrone, Marco Cioppa, Angelo Popusoi, Grigore Pucciarelli, Armando Verdoliva, Sebastiano Franzese, Michele Marga, Simion Barbato, Emanuele Tesorio, Tullio Diagnostics (Basel) Article Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is usually performed through a femoral vascular access using 6–9 Fr guiding catheters. We investigated whether a systematic distal radial approach using 5 Fr guiding sheaths was a safe and effective alternative to transfemoral approach for CAS. From July 2020 to October 2022, two operators at our center systematically performed CAS using a 5 Fr distal radial approach in consecutive patients. The main endpoints of the study were procedural success via distal radial and via proximal or distal radial access. The learning curve was evaluated by comparing the first half of patients versus the second half of patients enrolled. Procedural data and 30-day clinical outcomes were collected. Fifty-one patients were prospectively enrolled. CAS was effectively performed via distal radial access in 45 patients (88%). Overall radial artery success was 92%. Distal radial CAS was successfully performed in 20 out of the first 25 patients enrolled (80%), and in 25 of the last 26 patients enrolled (96%; p = 0.07). Significantly less contrast was administered in the last 26 patients compared to the first 25 enrolled (110 (70, 140) mL vs. 120 (107, 150) mL; p = 0.045). Radial artery occlusion was reported in 1 patient (2%). Only 1 minor stroke (2%) was reported in-hospital and at 30-day follow-up. In conclusion, distal radial CAS using 5 Fr catheters was a safe procedure with a high success rate. The procedure had a relatively short learning curve in operators familiar with transfemoral CAS. MDPI 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10093593/ /pubmed/37046483 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071266 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Di Gioia, Giuseppe Salemme, Luigi Ferrone, Marco Cioppa, Angelo Popusoi, Grigore Pucciarelli, Armando Verdoliva, Sebastiano Franzese, Michele Marga, Simion Barbato, Emanuele Tesorio, Tullio Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access |
title | Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access |
title_full | Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access |
title_fullStr | Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access |
title_full_unstemmed | Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access |
title_short | Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access |
title_sort | carotid artery stenting using five-french distal radial vascular access |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046483 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071266 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT digioiagiuseppe carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess AT salemmeluigi carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess AT ferronemarco carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess AT cioppaangelo carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess AT popusoigrigore carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess AT pucciarelliarmando carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess AT verdolivasebastiano carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess AT franzesemichele carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess AT margasimion carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess AT barbatoemanuele carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess AT tesoriotullio carotidarterystentingusingfivefrenchdistalradialvascularaccess |