Cargando…
Sex-Specific Models to Predict Insulin Secretion and Sensitivity in Subjects with Overweight and Obesity
Sex-specific differences exist in insulin secretion (ISec) and sensitivity (IS) in humans. However, current fasting indices used to estimate them, such as HOMA and QUICKI, are not sex-specific. We aimed to develop sex-specific models to improve the prediction of ISec and IS by fasting measures in ad...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37047103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076130 |
Sumario: | Sex-specific differences exist in insulin secretion (ISec) and sensitivity (IS) in humans. However, current fasting indices used to estimate them, such as HOMA and QUICKI, are not sex-specific. We aimed to develop sex-specific models to improve the prediction of ISec and IS by fasting measures in adults with overweight/obesity. A post hoc analysis was conducted on baseline data of two clinical trials completed between 2010 and 2020 (37 men and 61 postmenopausal women, 45–73 years, BMI > 25 kg/m(2), without chronic disease). Glucose-induced insulin or C-peptide secretions and IS were measured using gold-standard Botnia-clamps, which is a 1 h intravenous glucose tolerance test followed by a 3 h hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp. Stepwise regression analysis using anthropometric and fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and lipoprotein-related measures was used to predict ISec and IS. First-phase, second-phase and total glucose-induced ISec were predicted by a combination of fasting plasma insulin and apoB without or with plasma glucose, triglyceride, and waist circumference in women (R(2) = 0.58–0.69), and by plasma insulin and glucose without or with BMI and cholesterol in men (R(2) = 0.41–0.83). Plasma C-peptide, alone in men or followed by glucose in women, predicted C-peptide secretion. IS was predicted by plasma insulin and waist circumference, followed by HDL-C in women (R(2) = 0.57) or by glucose in men (R(2) = 0.67). The sex-specific models agreed with the Botnia-clamp measurements of ISec and IS more than with HOMA or QUICKI. Sex-specific models incorporating anthropometric and lipoprotein-related parameters allowed better prediction of ISec and IS in subjects with overweight or obesity than current indices that rely on glucose and insulin alone. |
---|