Cargando…

Comparison between Three Different Techniques for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Liquid Biopsies of Patients with Advanced Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma

Oncogenic mutations in the EGFR gene are targets of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LC) patients, and their search is mandatory to make decisions on treatment strategies. Liquid biopsy of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly used to detect EGFR mutations, includin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casula, Milena, Pisano, Marina, Paliogiannis, Panagiotis, Colombino, Maria, Sini, Maria Cristina, Zinellu, Angelo, Santeufemia, Davide, Manca, Antonella, Casula, Stefania, Tore, Silvia, Lobrano, Renato, Cossu, Antonio, Palmieri, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37047382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076410
_version_ 1785023774562713600
author Casula, Milena
Pisano, Marina
Paliogiannis, Panagiotis
Colombino, Maria
Sini, Maria Cristina
Zinellu, Angelo
Santeufemia, Davide
Manca, Antonella
Casula, Stefania
Tore, Silvia
Lobrano, Renato
Cossu, Antonio
Palmieri, Giuseppe
author_facet Casula, Milena
Pisano, Marina
Paliogiannis, Panagiotis
Colombino, Maria
Sini, Maria Cristina
Zinellu, Angelo
Santeufemia, Davide
Manca, Antonella
Casula, Stefania
Tore, Silvia
Lobrano, Renato
Cossu, Antonio
Palmieri, Giuseppe
author_sort Casula, Milena
collection PubMed
description Oncogenic mutations in the EGFR gene are targets of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LC) patients, and their search is mandatory to make decisions on treatment strategies. Liquid biopsy of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly used to detect EGFR mutations, including main activating alterations (exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutation) and T790M mutation, which is the most common mechanism of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation TKIs. In this study, we prospectively compared three different techniques for EGFR mutation detection in liquid biopsies of such patients. Fifty-four ctDNA samples from 48 consecutive advanced LC patients treated with TKIs were tested for relevant EGFR mutations with Therascreen(®) EGFR Plasma RGQ-PCR Kit (Qiagen). Samples were subsequently tested with two different technologies, with the aim to compare the EGFR detection rates: real-time PCR based Idylla™ ctEGFR mutation assay (Biocartis) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) system with Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot panel (ThermoFisher). A high concordance rate for main druggable EGFR alterations was observed with the two real-time PCR-based assays, ranging from 100% for T790M mutation to 94% for L858R variant and 85% for exon 19 deletions. Conversely, lower concordance rates were found between real-time PCR approaches and the NGS method (L858R: 88%; exon19-dels: 74%; T790M: 37.5%). Our results evidenced an equivalent detection ability between PCR-based techniques for circulating EGFR mutations. The NGS assay allowed detection of a wider range of EGFR mutations but showed a poor ability to detect T790M.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10094170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100941702023-04-13 Comparison between Three Different Techniques for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Liquid Biopsies of Patients with Advanced Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma Casula, Milena Pisano, Marina Paliogiannis, Panagiotis Colombino, Maria Sini, Maria Cristina Zinellu, Angelo Santeufemia, Davide Manca, Antonella Casula, Stefania Tore, Silvia Lobrano, Renato Cossu, Antonio Palmieri, Giuseppe Int J Mol Sci Article Oncogenic mutations in the EGFR gene are targets of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LC) patients, and their search is mandatory to make decisions on treatment strategies. Liquid biopsy of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly used to detect EGFR mutations, including main activating alterations (exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutation) and T790M mutation, which is the most common mechanism of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation TKIs. In this study, we prospectively compared three different techniques for EGFR mutation detection in liquid biopsies of such patients. Fifty-four ctDNA samples from 48 consecutive advanced LC patients treated with TKIs were tested for relevant EGFR mutations with Therascreen(®) EGFR Plasma RGQ-PCR Kit (Qiagen). Samples were subsequently tested with two different technologies, with the aim to compare the EGFR detection rates: real-time PCR based Idylla™ ctEGFR mutation assay (Biocartis) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) system with Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot panel (ThermoFisher). A high concordance rate for main druggable EGFR alterations was observed with the two real-time PCR-based assays, ranging from 100% for T790M mutation to 94% for L858R variant and 85% for exon 19 deletions. Conversely, lower concordance rates were found between real-time PCR approaches and the NGS method (L858R: 88%; exon19-dels: 74%; T790M: 37.5%). Our results evidenced an equivalent detection ability between PCR-based techniques for circulating EGFR mutations. The NGS assay allowed detection of a wider range of EGFR mutations but showed a poor ability to detect T790M. MDPI 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10094170/ /pubmed/37047382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076410 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Casula, Milena
Pisano, Marina
Paliogiannis, Panagiotis
Colombino, Maria
Sini, Maria Cristina
Zinellu, Angelo
Santeufemia, Davide
Manca, Antonella
Casula, Stefania
Tore, Silvia
Lobrano, Renato
Cossu, Antonio
Palmieri, Giuseppe
Comparison between Three Different Techniques for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Liquid Biopsies of Patients with Advanced Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma
title Comparison between Three Different Techniques for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Liquid Biopsies of Patients with Advanced Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma
title_full Comparison between Three Different Techniques for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Liquid Biopsies of Patients with Advanced Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Comparison between Three Different Techniques for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Liquid Biopsies of Patients with Advanced Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Three Different Techniques for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Liquid Biopsies of Patients with Advanced Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma
title_short Comparison between Three Different Techniques for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Liquid Biopsies of Patients with Advanced Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma
title_sort comparison between three different techniques for the detection of egfr mutations in liquid biopsies of patients with advanced stage lung adenocarcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37047382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076410
work_keys_str_mv AT casulamilena comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT pisanomarina comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT paliogiannispanagiotis comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT colombinomaria comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT sinimariacristina comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT zinelluangelo comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT santeufemiadavide comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT mancaantonella comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT casulastefania comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT toresilvia comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT lobranorenato comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT cossuantonio comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma
AT palmierigiuseppe comparisonbetweenthreedifferenttechniquesforthedetectionofegfrmutationsinliquidbiopsiesofpatientswithadvancedstagelungadenocarcinoma