Cargando…

Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions

In the 1990s, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) restricted its risk assessment for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in seven ways: (1) Inappropriate focus on heat, ignoring sub-thermal effects. (2) Reliance on exposure experiments performed over very short...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Héroux, Paul, Belyaev, Igor, Chamberlin, Kent, Dasdag, Suleyman, De Salles, Alvaro Augusto Almeida, Rodriguez, Claudio Enrique Fernandez, Hardell, Lennart, Kelley, Elizabeth, Kesari, Kavindra Kumar, Mallery-Blythe, Erica, Melnick, Ronald L., Miller, Anthony B., Moskowitz, Joel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075398
_version_ 1785023905248837632
author Héroux, Paul
Belyaev, Igor
Chamberlin, Kent
Dasdag, Suleyman
De Salles, Alvaro Augusto Almeida
Rodriguez, Claudio Enrique Fernandez
Hardell, Lennart
Kelley, Elizabeth
Kesari, Kavindra Kumar
Mallery-Blythe, Erica
Melnick, Ronald L.
Miller, Anthony B.
Moskowitz, Joel M.
author_facet Héroux, Paul
Belyaev, Igor
Chamberlin, Kent
Dasdag, Suleyman
De Salles, Alvaro Augusto Almeida
Rodriguez, Claudio Enrique Fernandez
Hardell, Lennart
Kelley, Elizabeth
Kesari, Kavindra Kumar
Mallery-Blythe, Erica
Melnick, Ronald L.
Miller, Anthony B.
Moskowitz, Joel M.
author_sort Héroux, Paul
collection PubMed
description In the 1990s, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) restricted its risk assessment for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in seven ways: (1) Inappropriate focus on heat, ignoring sub-thermal effects. (2) Reliance on exposure experiments performed over very short times. (3) Overlooking time/amplitude characteristics of RFR signals. (4) Ignoring carcinogenicity, hypersensitivity, and other health conditions connected with RFR. (5) Measuring cellphone Specific Absorption Rates (SAR) at arbitrary distances from the head. (6) Averaging SAR doses at volumetric/mass scales irrelevant to health. (7) Using unrealistic simulations for cell phone SAR estimations. Low-cost software and hardware modifications are proposed here for cellular phone RFR exposure mitigation: (1) inhibiting RFR emissions in contact with the body, (2) use of antenna patterns reducing the Percent of Power absorbed in the Head (PPHead) and body and increasing the Percent of Power Radiated for communications (PPR), and (3) automated protocol-based reductions of the number of RFR emissions, their duration, or integrated dose. These inexpensive measures do not fundamentally alter cell phone functions or communications quality. A health threat is scientifically documented at many levels and acknowledged by industries. Yet mitigation of RFR exposures to users does not appear as a priority with most cell phone manufacturers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10094704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100947042023-04-13 Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions Héroux, Paul Belyaev, Igor Chamberlin, Kent Dasdag, Suleyman De Salles, Alvaro Augusto Almeida Rodriguez, Claudio Enrique Fernandez Hardell, Lennart Kelley, Elizabeth Kesari, Kavindra Kumar Mallery-Blythe, Erica Melnick, Ronald L. Miller, Anthony B. Moskowitz, Joel M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review In the 1990s, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) restricted its risk assessment for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in seven ways: (1) Inappropriate focus on heat, ignoring sub-thermal effects. (2) Reliance on exposure experiments performed over very short times. (3) Overlooking time/amplitude characteristics of RFR signals. (4) Ignoring carcinogenicity, hypersensitivity, and other health conditions connected with RFR. (5) Measuring cellphone Specific Absorption Rates (SAR) at arbitrary distances from the head. (6) Averaging SAR doses at volumetric/mass scales irrelevant to health. (7) Using unrealistic simulations for cell phone SAR estimations. Low-cost software and hardware modifications are proposed here for cellular phone RFR exposure mitigation: (1) inhibiting RFR emissions in contact with the body, (2) use of antenna patterns reducing the Percent of Power absorbed in the Head (PPHead) and body and increasing the Percent of Power Radiated for communications (PPR), and (3) automated protocol-based reductions of the number of RFR emissions, their duration, or integrated dose. These inexpensive measures do not fundamentally alter cell phone functions or communications quality. A health threat is scientifically documented at many levels and acknowledged by industries. Yet mitigation of RFR exposures to users does not appear as a priority with most cell phone manufacturers. MDPI 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10094704/ /pubmed/37048013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075398 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Héroux, Paul
Belyaev, Igor
Chamberlin, Kent
Dasdag, Suleyman
De Salles, Alvaro Augusto Almeida
Rodriguez, Claudio Enrique Fernandez
Hardell, Lennart
Kelley, Elizabeth
Kesari, Kavindra Kumar
Mallery-Blythe, Erica
Melnick, Ronald L.
Miller, Anthony B.
Moskowitz, Joel M.
Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions
title Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions
title_full Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions
title_fullStr Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions
title_full_unstemmed Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions
title_short Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions
title_sort cell phone radiation exposure limits and engineering solutions
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075398
work_keys_str_mv AT herouxpaul cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT belyaevigor cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT chamberlinkent cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT dasdagsuleyman cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT desallesalvaroaugustoalmeida cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT rodriguezclaudioenriquefernandez cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT hardelllennart cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT kelleyelizabeth cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT kesarikavindrakumar cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT malleryblytheerica cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT melnickronaldl cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT milleranthonyb cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT moskowitzjoelm cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions
AT cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions