Cargando…
Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions
In the 1990s, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) restricted its risk assessment for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in seven ways: (1) Inappropriate focus on heat, ignoring sub-thermal effects. (2) Reliance on exposure experiments performed over very short...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075398 |
_version_ | 1785023905248837632 |
---|---|
author | Héroux, Paul Belyaev, Igor Chamberlin, Kent Dasdag, Suleyman De Salles, Alvaro Augusto Almeida Rodriguez, Claudio Enrique Fernandez Hardell, Lennart Kelley, Elizabeth Kesari, Kavindra Kumar Mallery-Blythe, Erica Melnick, Ronald L. Miller, Anthony B. Moskowitz, Joel M. |
author_facet | Héroux, Paul Belyaev, Igor Chamberlin, Kent Dasdag, Suleyman De Salles, Alvaro Augusto Almeida Rodriguez, Claudio Enrique Fernandez Hardell, Lennart Kelley, Elizabeth Kesari, Kavindra Kumar Mallery-Blythe, Erica Melnick, Ronald L. Miller, Anthony B. Moskowitz, Joel M. |
author_sort | Héroux, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the 1990s, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) restricted its risk assessment for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in seven ways: (1) Inappropriate focus on heat, ignoring sub-thermal effects. (2) Reliance on exposure experiments performed over very short times. (3) Overlooking time/amplitude characteristics of RFR signals. (4) Ignoring carcinogenicity, hypersensitivity, and other health conditions connected with RFR. (5) Measuring cellphone Specific Absorption Rates (SAR) at arbitrary distances from the head. (6) Averaging SAR doses at volumetric/mass scales irrelevant to health. (7) Using unrealistic simulations for cell phone SAR estimations. Low-cost software and hardware modifications are proposed here for cellular phone RFR exposure mitigation: (1) inhibiting RFR emissions in contact with the body, (2) use of antenna patterns reducing the Percent of Power absorbed in the Head (PPHead) and body and increasing the Percent of Power Radiated for communications (PPR), and (3) automated protocol-based reductions of the number of RFR emissions, their duration, or integrated dose. These inexpensive measures do not fundamentally alter cell phone functions or communications quality. A health threat is scientifically documented at many levels and acknowledged by industries. Yet mitigation of RFR exposures to users does not appear as a priority with most cell phone manufacturers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10094704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100947042023-04-13 Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions Héroux, Paul Belyaev, Igor Chamberlin, Kent Dasdag, Suleyman De Salles, Alvaro Augusto Almeida Rodriguez, Claudio Enrique Fernandez Hardell, Lennart Kelley, Elizabeth Kesari, Kavindra Kumar Mallery-Blythe, Erica Melnick, Ronald L. Miller, Anthony B. Moskowitz, Joel M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review In the 1990s, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) restricted its risk assessment for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in seven ways: (1) Inappropriate focus on heat, ignoring sub-thermal effects. (2) Reliance on exposure experiments performed over very short times. (3) Overlooking time/amplitude characteristics of RFR signals. (4) Ignoring carcinogenicity, hypersensitivity, and other health conditions connected with RFR. (5) Measuring cellphone Specific Absorption Rates (SAR) at arbitrary distances from the head. (6) Averaging SAR doses at volumetric/mass scales irrelevant to health. (7) Using unrealistic simulations for cell phone SAR estimations. Low-cost software and hardware modifications are proposed here for cellular phone RFR exposure mitigation: (1) inhibiting RFR emissions in contact with the body, (2) use of antenna patterns reducing the Percent of Power absorbed in the Head (PPHead) and body and increasing the Percent of Power Radiated for communications (PPR), and (3) automated protocol-based reductions of the number of RFR emissions, their duration, or integrated dose. These inexpensive measures do not fundamentally alter cell phone functions or communications quality. A health threat is scientifically documented at many levels and acknowledged by industries. Yet mitigation of RFR exposures to users does not appear as a priority with most cell phone manufacturers. MDPI 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10094704/ /pubmed/37048013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075398 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Héroux, Paul Belyaev, Igor Chamberlin, Kent Dasdag, Suleyman De Salles, Alvaro Augusto Almeida Rodriguez, Claudio Enrique Fernandez Hardell, Lennart Kelley, Elizabeth Kesari, Kavindra Kumar Mallery-Blythe, Erica Melnick, Ronald L. Miller, Anthony B. Moskowitz, Joel M. Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions |
title | Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions |
title_full | Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions |
title_fullStr | Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions |
title_short | Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions |
title_sort | cell phone radiation exposure limits and engineering solutions |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herouxpaul cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT belyaevigor cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT chamberlinkent cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT dasdagsuleyman cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT desallesalvaroaugustoalmeida cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT rodriguezclaudioenriquefernandez cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT hardelllennart cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT kelleyelizabeth cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT kesarikavindrakumar cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT malleryblytheerica cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT melnickronaldl cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT milleranthonyb cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT moskowitzjoelm cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions AT cellphoneradiationexposurelimitsandengineeringsolutions |