Cargando…

Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study

Recently, our group developed two different polymeric biomaterials with photodynamic antimicrobial surface activity for periodontal bone regeneration. The aim of the present study was to analyze the biocompatibility and osseointegration of these materials in vivo. Two biomaterials based on urethane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sigusch, Bernd, Kranz, Stefan, von Hohenberg, Andreas Clemm, Wehle, Sabine, Guellmar, André, Steen, Dorika, Berg, Albrecht, Rabe, Ute, Heyder, Markus, Reise, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37047171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076200
_version_ 1785023908127178752
author Sigusch, Bernd
Kranz, Stefan
von Hohenberg, Andreas Clemm
Wehle, Sabine
Guellmar, André
Steen, Dorika
Berg, Albrecht
Rabe, Ute
Heyder, Markus
Reise, Markus
author_facet Sigusch, Bernd
Kranz, Stefan
von Hohenberg, Andreas Clemm
Wehle, Sabine
Guellmar, André
Steen, Dorika
Berg, Albrecht
Rabe, Ute
Heyder, Markus
Reise, Markus
author_sort Sigusch, Bernd
collection PubMed
description Recently, our group developed two different polymeric biomaterials with photodynamic antimicrobial surface activity for periodontal bone regeneration. The aim of the present study was to analyze the biocompatibility and osseointegration of these materials in vivo. Two biomaterials based on urethane dimethacrylate (BioM1) and tri-armed oligoester-urethane methacrylate (BioM2) that additionally contained ß-tricalcium phosphate and the photosensitizer mTHPC (meso-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin) were implanted in non-critical size bone defects in the femur (n = 16) and tibia (n = 8) of eight female domestic sheep. Bone specimens were harvested and histomorphometrically analyzed after 12 months. BioM1 degraded to a lower extent which resulted in a mean remnant square size of 17.4 mm², while 12.2 mm² was estimated for BioM2 (p = 0.007). For BioM1, a total percentage of new formed bone by 30.3% was found which was significant higher compared to BioM2 (8.4%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, BioM1 was afflicted by significant lower soft tissue formation (3.3%) as compared to BioM2 (29.5%). Additionally, a bone-to-biomaterial ratio of 81.9% was detected for BioM1, while 8.5% was recorded for BioM2. Implantation of BioM2 caused accumulation of inflammatory cells and led to fibrous encapsulation. BioM1 (photosensitizer-armed urethane dimethacrylate) showed favorable regenerative characteristics and can be recommended for further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10094716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100947162023-04-13 Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study Sigusch, Bernd Kranz, Stefan von Hohenberg, Andreas Clemm Wehle, Sabine Guellmar, André Steen, Dorika Berg, Albrecht Rabe, Ute Heyder, Markus Reise, Markus Int J Mol Sci Article Recently, our group developed two different polymeric biomaterials with photodynamic antimicrobial surface activity for periodontal bone regeneration. The aim of the present study was to analyze the biocompatibility and osseointegration of these materials in vivo. Two biomaterials based on urethane dimethacrylate (BioM1) and tri-armed oligoester-urethane methacrylate (BioM2) that additionally contained ß-tricalcium phosphate and the photosensitizer mTHPC (meso-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin) were implanted in non-critical size bone defects in the femur (n = 16) and tibia (n = 8) of eight female domestic sheep. Bone specimens were harvested and histomorphometrically analyzed after 12 months. BioM1 degraded to a lower extent which resulted in a mean remnant square size of 17.4 mm², while 12.2 mm² was estimated for BioM2 (p = 0.007). For BioM1, a total percentage of new formed bone by 30.3% was found which was significant higher compared to BioM2 (8.4%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, BioM1 was afflicted by significant lower soft tissue formation (3.3%) as compared to BioM2 (29.5%). Additionally, a bone-to-biomaterial ratio of 81.9% was detected for BioM1, while 8.5% was recorded for BioM2. Implantation of BioM2 caused accumulation of inflammatory cells and led to fibrous encapsulation. BioM1 (photosensitizer-armed urethane dimethacrylate) showed favorable regenerative characteristics and can be recommended for further studies. MDPI 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10094716/ /pubmed/37047171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076200 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sigusch, Bernd
Kranz, Stefan
von Hohenberg, Andreas Clemm
Wehle, Sabine
Guellmar, André
Steen, Dorika
Berg, Albrecht
Rabe, Ute
Heyder, Markus
Reise, Markus
Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study
title Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study
title_full Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study
title_fullStr Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study
title_full_unstemmed Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study
title_short Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study
title_sort histological and histomorphometric evaluation of implanted photodynamic active biomaterials for periodontal bone regeneration in an animal study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37047171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076200
work_keys_str_mv AT siguschbernd histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy
AT kranzstefan histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy
AT vonhohenbergandreasclemm histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy
AT wehlesabine histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy
AT guellmarandre histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy
AT steendorika histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy
AT bergalbrecht histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy
AT rabeute histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy
AT heydermarkus histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy
AT reisemarkus histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy