Cargando…
Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study
Recently, our group developed two different polymeric biomaterials with photodynamic antimicrobial surface activity for periodontal bone regeneration. The aim of the present study was to analyze the biocompatibility and osseointegration of these materials in vivo. Two biomaterials based on urethane...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37047171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076200 |
_version_ | 1785023908127178752 |
---|---|
author | Sigusch, Bernd Kranz, Stefan von Hohenberg, Andreas Clemm Wehle, Sabine Guellmar, André Steen, Dorika Berg, Albrecht Rabe, Ute Heyder, Markus Reise, Markus |
author_facet | Sigusch, Bernd Kranz, Stefan von Hohenberg, Andreas Clemm Wehle, Sabine Guellmar, André Steen, Dorika Berg, Albrecht Rabe, Ute Heyder, Markus Reise, Markus |
author_sort | Sigusch, Bernd |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, our group developed two different polymeric biomaterials with photodynamic antimicrobial surface activity for periodontal bone regeneration. The aim of the present study was to analyze the biocompatibility and osseointegration of these materials in vivo. Two biomaterials based on urethane dimethacrylate (BioM1) and tri-armed oligoester-urethane methacrylate (BioM2) that additionally contained ß-tricalcium phosphate and the photosensitizer mTHPC (meso-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin) were implanted in non-critical size bone defects in the femur (n = 16) and tibia (n = 8) of eight female domestic sheep. Bone specimens were harvested and histomorphometrically analyzed after 12 months. BioM1 degraded to a lower extent which resulted in a mean remnant square size of 17.4 mm², while 12.2 mm² was estimated for BioM2 (p = 0.007). For BioM1, a total percentage of new formed bone by 30.3% was found which was significant higher compared to BioM2 (8.4%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, BioM1 was afflicted by significant lower soft tissue formation (3.3%) as compared to BioM2 (29.5%). Additionally, a bone-to-biomaterial ratio of 81.9% was detected for BioM1, while 8.5% was recorded for BioM2. Implantation of BioM2 caused accumulation of inflammatory cells and led to fibrous encapsulation. BioM1 (photosensitizer-armed urethane dimethacrylate) showed favorable regenerative characteristics and can be recommended for further studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10094716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100947162023-04-13 Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study Sigusch, Bernd Kranz, Stefan von Hohenberg, Andreas Clemm Wehle, Sabine Guellmar, André Steen, Dorika Berg, Albrecht Rabe, Ute Heyder, Markus Reise, Markus Int J Mol Sci Article Recently, our group developed two different polymeric biomaterials with photodynamic antimicrobial surface activity for periodontal bone regeneration. The aim of the present study was to analyze the biocompatibility and osseointegration of these materials in vivo. Two biomaterials based on urethane dimethacrylate (BioM1) and tri-armed oligoester-urethane methacrylate (BioM2) that additionally contained ß-tricalcium phosphate and the photosensitizer mTHPC (meso-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin) were implanted in non-critical size bone defects in the femur (n = 16) and tibia (n = 8) of eight female domestic sheep. Bone specimens were harvested and histomorphometrically analyzed after 12 months. BioM1 degraded to a lower extent which resulted in a mean remnant square size of 17.4 mm², while 12.2 mm² was estimated for BioM2 (p = 0.007). For BioM1, a total percentage of new formed bone by 30.3% was found which was significant higher compared to BioM2 (8.4%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, BioM1 was afflicted by significant lower soft tissue formation (3.3%) as compared to BioM2 (29.5%). Additionally, a bone-to-biomaterial ratio of 81.9% was detected for BioM1, while 8.5% was recorded for BioM2. Implantation of BioM2 caused accumulation of inflammatory cells and led to fibrous encapsulation. BioM1 (photosensitizer-armed urethane dimethacrylate) showed favorable regenerative characteristics and can be recommended for further studies. MDPI 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10094716/ /pubmed/37047171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076200 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sigusch, Bernd Kranz, Stefan von Hohenberg, Andreas Clemm Wehle, Sabine Guellmar, André Steen, Dorika Berg, Albrecht Rabe, Ute Heyder, Markus Reise, Markus Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study |
title | Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study |
title_full | Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study |
title_fullStr | Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study |
title_short | Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study |
title_sort | histological and histomorphometric evaluation of implanted photodynamic active biomaterials for periodontal bone regeneration in an animal study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37047171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siguschbernd histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy AT kranzstefan histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy AT vonhohenbergandreasclemm histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy AT wehlesabine histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy AT guellmarandre histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy AT steendorika histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy AT bergalbrecht histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy AT rabeute histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy AT heydermarkus histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy AT reisemarkus histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofimplantedphotodynamicactivebiomaterialsforperiodontalboneregenerationinananimalstudy |