Cargando…

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Healthy diet, weight control and physical activity to reduce obesity can be motivated by financial incentives (FI). Behavioral-economic approaches may improve the incentivization effectiveness. This study compares and ranks the effectiveness of standard and behavioral incentivization for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boonmanunt, Suparee, Pattanaprateep, Oraluck, Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong, McKay, Gareth, Attia, John, Vlaev, Ivo, Thakkinstian, Ammarin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaac066
_version_ 1785023964605579264
author Boonmanunt, Suparee
Pattanaprateep, Oraluck
Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong
McKay, Gareth
Attia, John
Vlaev, Ivo
Thakkinstian, Ammarin
author_facet Boonmanunt, Suparee
Pattanaprateep, Oraluck
Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong
McKay, Gareth
Attia, John
Vlaev, Ivo
Thakkinstian, Ammarin
author_sort Boonmanunt, Suparee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthy diet, weight control and physical activity to reduce obesity can be motivated by financial incentives (FI). Behavioral-economic approaches may improve the incentivization effectiveness. This study compares and ranks the effectiveness of standard and behavioral incentivization for healthy diet, weight control, and physical activity promotion. PURPOSE: To investigate whether behavioral-economic insights improve incentivization effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline and Scopus was performed from database inception to December 2020. Study characteristics, program designs, and risk ratio (RR) were extracted. A two-stage network meta-analysis pooled and ranked intervention effects. RESULTS: There were 35 eligible RCTs. For diet-weight control, standard FI, deposit contract (deposit), lottery-based incentive (lottery), and standard-FI + lottery increased goal achievement compared to no-FI but only deposit was statistically significant with pooled RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 1.21 (0.94, 1.56), 1.79 (1.04, 3.05), 1.45 (0.99, 2.13), and 1.73 (0.83, 3.63). For physical activity, standard-FI, deposit, and lottery significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.38 (1.13, 1.68), 1.63 (1.24, 2.14) and 1.43 (1.14, 1.80), respectively. In a follow-up period for physical activity, only deposit significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.39 (1.11, 1.73). CONCLUSION: Deposit, followed by lottery, were best for motivating healthy diet, weight control and physical activity at program end. Post-intervention, deposit then standard-FI were best for motivating physical activity. Behavioral insights can improve incentivization effectiveness, although lottery-based approaches may offer only short-term benefit regarding physical activity. However, the imprecise intervention effects were major concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10094952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100949522023-04-13 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis Boonmanunt, Suparee Pattanaprateep, Oraluck Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong McKay, Gareth Attia, John Vlaev, Ivo Thakkinstian, Ammarin Ann Behav Med Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Healthy diet, weight control and physical activity to reduce obesity can be motivated by financial incentives (FI). Behavioral-economic approaches may improve the incentivization effectiveness. This study compares and ranks the effectiveness of standard and behavioral incentivization for healthy diet, weight control, and physical activity promotion. PURPOSE: To investigate whether behavioral-economic insights improve incentivization effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline and Scopus was performed from database inception to December 2020. Study characteristics, program designs, and risk ratio (RR) were extracted. A two-stage network meta-analysis pooled and ranked intervention effects. RESULTS: There were 35 eligible RCTs. For diet-weight control, standard FI, deposit contract (deposit), lottery-based incentive (lottery), and standard-FI + lottery increased goal achievement compared to no-FI but only deposit was statistically significant with pooled RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 1.21 (0.94, 1.56), 1.79 (1.04, 3.05), 1.45 (0.99, 2.13), and 1.73 (0.83, 3.63). For physical activity, standard-FI, deposit, and lottery significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.38 (1.13, 1.68), 1.63 (1.24, 2.14) and 1.43 (1.14, 1.80), respectively. In a follow-up period for physical activity, only deposit significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.39 (1.11, 1.73). CONCLUSION: Deposit, followed by lottery, were best for motivating healthy diet, weight control and physical activity at program end. Post-intervention, deposit then standard-FI were best for motivating physical activity. Behavioral insights can improve incentivization effectiveness, although lottery-based approaches may offer only short-term benefit regarding physical activity. However, the imprecise intervention effects were major concerns. Oxford University Press 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10094952/ /pubmed/36367428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaac066 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Boonmanunt, Suparee
Pattanaprateep, Oraluck
Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong
McKay, Gareth
Attia, John
Vlaev, Ivo
Thakkinstian, Ammarin
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_full Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_short Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_sort evaluation of the effectiveness of behavioral economic incentive programs for goal achievement on healthy diet, weight control and physical activity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaac066
work_keys_str_mv AT boonmanuntsuparee evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT pattanaprateeporaluck evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT ongphiphadhanakulboonsong evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mckaygareth evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT attiajohn evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT vlaevivo evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT thakkinstianammarin evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis