Cargando…
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Healthy diet, weight control and physical activity to reduce obesity can be motivated by financial incentives (FI). Behavioral-economic approaches may improve the incentivization effectiveness. This study compares and ranks the effectiveness of standard and behavioral incentivization for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaac066 |
_version_ | 1785023964605579264 |
---|---|
author | Boonmanunt, Suparee Pattanaprateep, Oraluck Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong McKay, Gareth Attia, John Vlaev, Ivo Thakkinstian, Ammarin |
author_facet | Boonmanunt, Suparee Pattanaprateep, Oraluck Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong McKay, Gareth Attia, John Vlaev, Ivo Thakkinstian, Ammarin |
author_sort | Boonmanunt, Suparee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthy diet, weight control and physical activity to reduce obesity can be motivated by financial incentives (FI). Behavioral-economic approaches may improve the incentivization effectiveness. This study compares and ranks the effectiveness of standard and behavioral incentivization for healthy diet, weight control, and physical activity promotion. PURPOSE: To investigate whether behavioral-economic insights improve incentivization effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline and Scopus was performed from database inception to December 2020. Study characteristics, program designs, and risk ratio (RR) were extracted. A two-stage network meta-analysis pooled and ranked intervention effects. RESULTS: There were 35 eligible RCTs. For diet-weight control, standard FI, deposit contract (deposit), lottery-based incentive (lottery), and standard-FI + lottery increased goal achievement compared to no-FI but only deposit was statistically significant with pooled RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 1.21 (0.94, 1.56), 1.79 (1.04, 3.05), 1.45 (0.99, 2.13), and 1.73 (0.83, 3.63). For physical activity, standard-FI, deposit, and lottery significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.38 (1.13, 1.68), 1.63 (1.24, 2.14) and 1.43 (1.14, 1.80), respectively. In a follow-up period for physical activity, only deposit significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.39 (1.11, 1.73). CONCLUSION: Deposit, followed by lottery, were best for motivating healthy diet, weight control and physical activity at program end. Post-intervention, deposit then standard-FI were best for motivating physical activity. Behavioral insights can improve incentivization effectiveness, although lottery-based approaches may offer only short-term benefit regarding physical activity. However, the imprecise intervention effects were major concerns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10094952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100949522023-04-13 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis Boonmanunt, Suparee Pattanaprateep, Oraluck Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong McKay, Gareth Attia, John Vlaev, Ivo Thakkinstian, Ammarin Ann Behav Med Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Healthy diet, weight control and physical activity to reduce obesity can be motivated by financial incentives (FI). Behavioral-economic approaches may improve the incentivization effectiveness. This study compares and ranks the effectiveness of standard and behavioral incentivization for healthy diet, weight control, and physical activity promotion. PURPOSE: To investigate whether behavioral-economic insights improve incentivization effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline and Scopus was performed from database inception to December 2020. Study characteristics, program designs, and risk ratio (RR) were extracted. A two-stage network meta-analysis pooled and ranked intervention effects. RESULTS: There were 35 eligible RCTs. For diet-weight control, standard FI, deposit contract (deposit), lottery-based incentive (lottery), and standard-FI + lottery increased goal achievement compared to no-FI but only deposit was statistically significant with pooled RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 1.21 (0.94, 1.56), 1.79 (1.04, 3.05), 1.45 (0.99, 2.13), and 1.73 (0.83, 3.63). For physical activity, standard-FI, deposit, and lottery significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.38 (1.13, 1.68), 1.63 (1.24, 2.14) and 1.43 (1.14, 1.80), respectively. In a follow-up period for physical activity, only deposit significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.39 (1.11, 1.73). CONCLUSION: Deposit, followed by lottery, were best for motivating healthy diet, weight control and physical activity at program end. Post-intervention, deposit then standard-FI were best for motivating physical activity. Behavioral insights can improve incentivization effectiveness, although lottery-based approaches may offer only short-term benefit regarding physical activity. However, the imprecise intervention effects were major concerns. Oxford University Press 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10094952/ /pubmed/36367428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaac066 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Boonmanunt, Suparee Pattanaprateep, Oraluck Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong McKay, Gareth Attia, John Vlaev, Ivo Thakkinstian, Ammarin Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title | Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_full | Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_short | Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_sort | evaluation of the effectiveness of behavioral economic incentive programs for goal achievement on healthy diet, weight control and physical activity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaac066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boonmanuntsuparee evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT pattanaprateeporaluck evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT ongphiphadhanakulboonsong evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT mckaygareth evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT attiajohn evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT vlaevivo evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT thakkinstianammarin evaluationoftheeffectivenessofbehavioraleconomicincentiveprogramsforgoalachievementonhealthydietweightcontrolandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |