Cargando…

How Useful Is the SSN–Nipple Distance? An Analytical Questionnaire Survey on Anthropometric Measurements for the Aesthetically Ideal Positioning of the Nipple–Areolar Complex

Several studies have attempted to identify the optimal anthropometric measurement for the aesthetically ideal positioning of the nipple–areolar complex. However, no standardised solutions and measurements for planning surgical procedures have been reached. The aim of this study is to identify the op...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loucas, Rafael, Loucas, Marios, Leitsch, Sebastian, Mayer, Julius Michael, Alberti, Andrea, Haroon, Omar, Petrus, Marlon, Koban, Konstantin Christoph, Holzbach, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072494
_version_ 1785023993545228288
author Loucas, Rafael
Loucas, Marios
Leitsch, Sebastian
Mayer, Julius Michael
Alberti, Andrea
Haroon, Omar
Petrus, Marlon
Koban, Konstantin Christoph
Holzbach, Thomas
author_facet Loucas, Rafael
Loucas, Marios
Leitsch, Sebastian
Mayer, Julius Michael
Alberti, Andrea
Haroon, Omar
Petrus, Marlon
Koban, Konstantin Christoph
Holzbach, Thomas
author_sort Loucas, Rafael
collection PubMed
description Several studies have attempted to identify the optimal anthropometric measurement for the aesthetically ideal positioning of the nipple–areolar complex. However, no standardised solutions and measurements for planning surgical procedures have been reached. The aim of this study is to identify the optimal anthropometric measurement between the suprasternal notch (SSN)–nipple distance and mid-clavicle (MC)–nipple distance for the aesthetic position of the nipple–areola complex (NAC) on the breast. A detailed online survey was sent to 300 board-certified plastic surgeons and residents of plastic surgery departments of hospitals in German, Austrian, and Swiss. A similar survey was also provided to 100 patients who had planned or had already undergone breast surgery. All participants were asked to rank the attractiveness of a series of women’s breasts in images with different NAC position measurements. The images showed breasts from two different measurements and distances: all the breasts had equal dimensions and proportions and the same areola size. Complete datasets were obtained from 203 of the 300 board-certified plastic surgeons and residents of plastic surgery departments in German-speaking countries (recall 68%) and from 100 patients. The majority of doctors and patients find a symmetrical breast with a mirrored position of the nipple–areola complex more attractive than a non-symmetrical breast. In cases with minor measurement differences, such as 0.5 cm (SSN vs. MC), there is no relevant difference in the breast symmetry. However, at larger distances, the MC-to-nipple distance is superior for achieving aesthetically appealing symmetry compared with the SSN-to-nipple distance. Using the MC-to-nipple distance seems to be superior for correct nipple positioning than the SSN-to-nipple distance and is a valuable preoperative measurement option for breast symmetry with correct nipple height. Further studies on this topic involving a more general population should be conducted to confirm the improvements in perception with the preoperative measurements using the anatomical landmarks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10095071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100950712023-04-13 How Useful Is the SSN–Nipple Distance? An Analytical Questionnaire Survey on Anthropometric Measurements for the Aesthetically Ideal Positioning of the Nipple–Areolar Complex Loucas, Rafael Loucas, Marios Leitsch, Sebastian Mayer, Julius Michael Alberti, Andrea Haroon, Omar Petrus, Marlon Koban, Konstantin Christoph Holzbach, Thomas J Clin Med Article Several studies have attempted to identify the optimal anthropometric measurement for the aesthetically ideal positioning of the nipple–areolar complex. However, no standardised solutions and measurements for planning surgical procedures have been reached. The aim of this study is to identify the optimal anthropometric measurement between the suprasternal notch (SSN)–nipple distance and mid-clavicle (MC)–nipple distance for the aesthetic position of the nipple–areola complex (NAC) on the breast. A detailed online survey was sent to 300 board-certified plastic surgeons and residents of plastic surgery departments of hospitals in German, Austrian, and Swiss. A similar survey was also provided to 100 patients who had planned or had already undergone breast surgery. All participants were asked to rank the attractiveness of a series of women’s breasts in images with different NAC position measurements. The images showed breasts from two different measurements and distances: all the breasts had equal dimensions and proportions and the same areola size. Complete datasets were obtained from 203 of the 300 board-certified plastic surgeons and residents of plastic surgery departments in German-speaking countries (recall 68%) and from 100 patients. The majority of doctors and patients find a symmetrical breast with a mirrored position of the nipple–areola complex more attractive than a non-symmetrical breast. In cases with minor measurement differences, such as 0.5 cm (SSN vs. MC), there is no relevant difference in the breast symmetry. However, at larger distances, the MC-to-nipple distance is superior for achieving aesthetically appealing symmetry compared with the SSN-to-nipple distance. Using the MC-to-nipple distance seems to be superior for correct nipple positioning than the SSN-to-nipple distance and is a valuable preoperative measurement option for breast symmetry with correct nipple height. Further studies on this topic involving a more general population should be conducted to confirm the improvements in perception with the preoperative measurements using the anatomical landmarks. MDPI 2023-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10095071/ /pubmed/37048578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072494 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Loucas, Rafael
Loucas, Marios
Leitsch, Sebastian
Mayer, Julius Michael
Alberti, Andrea
Haroon, Omar
Petrus, Marlon
Koban, Konstantin Christoph
Holzbach, Thomas
How Useful Is the SSN–Nipple Distance? An Analytical Questionnaire Survey on Anthropometric Measurements for the Aesthetically Ideal Positioning of the Nipple–Areolar Complex
title How Useful Is the SSN–Nipple Distance? An Analytical Questionnaire Survey on Anthropometric Measurements for the Aesthetically Ideal Positioning of the Nipple–Areolar Complex
title_full How Useful Is the SSN–Nipple Distance? An Analytical Questionnaire Survey on Anthropometric Measurements for the Aesthetically Ideal Positioning of the Nipple–Areolar Complex
title_fullStr How Useful Is the SSN–Nipple Distance? An Analytical Questionnaire Survey on Anthropometric Measurements for the Aesthetically Ideal Positioning of the Nipple–Areolar Complex
title_full_unstemmed How Useful Is the SSN–Nipple Distance? An Analytical Questionnaire Survey on Anthropometric Measurements for the Aesthetically Ideal Positioning of the Nipple–Areolar Complex
title_short How Useful Is the SSN–Nipple Distance? An Analytical Questionnaire Survey on Anthropometric Measurements for the Aesthetically Ideal Positioning of the Nipple–Areolar Complex
title_sort how useful is the ssn–nipple distance? an analytical questionnaire survey on anthropometric measurements for the aesthetically ideal positioning of the nipple–areolar complex
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072494
work_keys_str_mv AT loucasrafael howusefulisthessnnippledistanceananalyticalquestionnairesurveyonanthropometricmeasurementsfortheaestheticallyidealpositioningofthenippleareolarcomplex
AT loucasmarios howusefulisthessnnippledistanceananalyticalquestionnairesurveyonanthropometricmeasurementsfortheaestheticallyidealpositioningofthenippleareolarcomplex
AT leitschsebastian howusefulisthessnnippledistanceananalyticalquestionnairesurveyonanthropometricmeasurementsfortheaestheticallyidealpositioningofthenippleareolarcomplex
AT mayerjuliusmichael howusefulisthessnnippledistanceananalyticalquestionnairesurveyonanthropometricmeasurementsfortheaestheticallyidealpositioningofthenippleareolarcomplex
AT albertiandrea howusefulisthessnnippledistanceananalyticalquestionnairesurveyonanthropometricmeasurementsfortheaestheticallyidealpositioningofthenippleareolarcomplex
AT haroonomar howusefulisthessnnippledistanceananalyticalquestionnairesurveyonanthropometricmeasurementsfortheaestheticallyidealpositioningofthenippleareolarcomplex
AT petrusmarlon howusefulisthessnnippledistanceananalyticalquestionnairesurveyonanthropometricmeasurementsfortheaestheticallyidealpositioningofthenippleareolarcomplex
AT kobankonstantinchristoph howusefulisthessnnippledistanceananalyticalquestionnairesurveyonanthropometricmeasurementsfortheaestheticallyidealpositioningofthenippleareolarcomplex
AT holzbachthomas howusefulisthessnnippledistanceananalyticalquestionnairesurveyonanthropometricmeasurementsfortheaestheticallyidealpositioningofthenippleareolarcomplex