Cargando…
Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal
The treatment of geriatric burn patients represents a major challenge in burn care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzymatic debridement (ED) in geriatric burn patients. Adult patients who received ED for treatment of mixed pattern and full thickness burns (August 2017–O...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072633 |
_version_ | 1785023993800032256 |
---|---|
author | Tapking, Christian Rontoyanni, Victoria G. Diehm, Yannick F. Strübing, Felix Solimani, Farzan Bigdeli, Amir K. Hundeshagen, Gabriel Fischer, Sebastian Kneser, Ulrich Siegwart, Laura C. |
author_facet | Tapking, Christian Rontoyanni, Victoria G. Diehm, Yannick F. Strübing, Felix Solimani, Farzan Bigdeli, Amir K. Hundeshagen, Gabriel Fischer, Sebastian Kneser, Ulrich Siegwart, Laura C. |
author_sort | Tapking, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The treatment of geriatric burn patients represents a major challenge in burn care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzymatic debridement (ED) in geriatric burn patients. Adult patients who received ED for treatment of mixed pattern and full thickness burns (August 2017–October 2022) were included in this study and grouped in the younger (18–65 years) and geriatric (≥65 years) groups. Primary outcome was a necessity of surgery subsequent to ED. Both groups (patient characteristics, surgical and non-surgical treatment) were compared. Multiple logistic and linear regression models were used to identify the effect of age on the outcomes. A total of 169 patients were included (younger group: 135 patients, geriatric group: 34 patients). The burn size as indicated by %TBSA (24.2 ± 20.4% vs. 26.8 ± 17.1%, p = 0.499) was similar in both groups. The ASA (2.5 ± 1.1 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and ABSI scores (6.1 ± 2.8 vs. 8.6 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the geriatric group. The %TBSA treated with ED (5.4 ± 5.0% vs. 4.4 ± 4.3%, p = 0.245) were similar in both groups. The necessity of additional surgical interventions (63.0 % vs. 58.8 %, p = 0.763) and the wound size debrided and grafted (2.9 ± 3.5% vs. 2.2 ± 2.1%; p = 0.301) were similar in both groups. Regression models yielded that age did not have an effect on efficacy of ED. We showed that ED is reliable and safe to use in geriatric patients. Age did not have a significant influence on the surgical outcomes of ED. In both groups, the size of the grafted area was reduced and, in many patients, surgery was avoided completely. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10095072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100950722023-04-13 Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal Tapking, Christian Rontoyanni, Victoria G. Diehm, Yannick F. Strübing, Felix Solimani, Farzan Bigdeli, Amir K. Hundeshagen, Gabriel Fischer, Sebastian Kneser, Ulrich Siegwart, Laura C. J Clin Med Article The treatment of geriatric burn patients represents a major challenge in burn care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzymatic debridement (ED) in geriatric burn patients. Adult patients who received ED for treatment of mixed pattern and full thickness burns (August 2017–October 2022) were included in this study and grouped in the younger (18–65 years) and geriatric (≥65 years) groups. Primary outcome was a necessity of surgery subsequent to ED. Both groups (patient characteristics, surgical and non-surgical treatment) were compared. Multiple logistic and linear regression models were used to identify the effect of age on the outcomes. A total of 169 patients were included (younger group: 135 patients, geriatric group: 34 patients). The burn size as indicated by %TBSA (24.2 ± 20.4% vs. 26.8 ± 17.1%, p = 0.499) was similar in both groups. The ASA (2.5 ± 1.1 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and ABSI scores (6.1 ± 2.8 vs. 8.6 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the geriatric group. The %TBSA treated with ED (5.4 ± 5.0% vs. 4.4 ± 4.3%, p = 0.245) were similar in both groups. The necessity of additional surgical interventions (63.0 % vs. 58.8 %, p = 0.763) and the wound size debrided and grafted (2.9 ± 3.5% vs. 2.2 ± 2.1%; p = 0.301) were similar in both groups. Regression models yielded that age did not have an effect on efficacy of ED. We showed that ED is reliable and safe to use in geriatric patients. Age did not have a significant influence on the surgical outcomes of ED. In both groups, the size of the grafted area was reduced and, in many patients, surgery was avoided completely. MDPI 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10095072/ /pubmed/37048716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072633 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tapking, Christian Rontoyanni, Victoria G. Diehm, Yannick F. Strübing, Felix Solimani, Farzan Bigdeli, Amir K. Hundeshagen, Gabriel Fischer, Sebastian Kneser, Ulrich Siegwart, Laura C. Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal |
title | Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal |
title_full | Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal |
title_fullStr | Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal |
title_full_unstemmed | Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal |
title_short | Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal |
title_sort | enzymatic debridement in geriatric burn patients—a reliable option for selective eschar removal |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tapkingchristian enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval AT rontoyannivictoriag enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval AT diehmyannickf enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval AT strubingfelix enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval AT solimanifarzan enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval AT bigdeliamirk enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval AT hundeshagengabriel enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval AT fischersebastian enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval AT kneserulrich enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval AT siegwartlaurac enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval |