Cargando…

Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal

The treatment of geriatric burn patients represents a major challenge in burn care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzymatic debridement (ED) in geriatric burn patients. Adult patients who received ED for treatment of mixed pattern and full thickness burns (August 2017–O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tapking, Christian, Rontoyanni, Victoria G., Diehm, Yannick F., Strübing, Felix, Solimani, Farzan, Bigdeli, Amir K., Hundeshagen, Gabriel, Fischer, Sebastian, Kneser, Ulrich, Siegwart, Laura C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072633
_version_ 1785023993800032256
author Tapking, Christian
Rontoyanni, Victoria G.
Diehm, Yannick F.
Strübing, Felix
Solimani, Farzan
Bigdeli, Amir K.
Hundeshagen, Gabriel
Fischer, Sebastian
Kneser, Ulrich
Siegwart, Laura C.
author_facet Tapking, Christian
Rontoyanni, Victoria G.
Diehm, Yannick F.
Strübing, Felix
Solimani, Farzan
Bigdeli, Amir K.
Hundeshagen, Gabriel
Fischer, Sebastian
Kneser, Ulrich
Siegwart, Laura C.
author_sort Tapking, Christian
collection PubMed
description The treatment of geriatric burn patients represents a major challenge in burn care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzymatic debridement (ED) in geriatric burn patients. Adult patients who received ED for treatment of mixed pattern and full thickness burns (August 2017–October 2022) were included in this study and grouped in the younger (18–65 years) and geriatric (≥65 years) groups. Primary outcome was a necessity of surgery subsequent to ED. Both groups (patient characteristics, surgical and non-surgical treatment) were compared. Multiple logistic and linear regression models were used to identify the effect of age on the outcomes. A total of 169 patients were included (younger group: 135 patients, geriatric group: 34 patients). The burn size as indicated by %TBSA (24.2 ± 20.4% vs. 26.8 ± 17.1%, p = 0.499) was similar in both groups. The ASA (2.5 ± 1.1 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and ABSI scores (6.1 ± 2.8 vs. 8.6 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the geriatric group. The %TBSA treated with ED (5.4 ± 5.0% vs. 4.4 ± 4.3%, p = 0.245) were similar in both groups. The necessity of additional surgical interventions (63.0 % vs. 58.8 %, p = 0.763) and the wound size debrided and grafted (2.9 ± 3.5% vs. 2.2 ± 2.1%; p = 0.301) were similar in both groups. Regression models yielded that age did not have an effect on efficacy of ED. We showed that ED is reliable and safe to use in geriatric patients. Age did not have a significant influence on the surgical outcomes of ED. In both groups, the size of the grafted area was reduced and, in many patients, surgery was avoided completely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10095072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100950722023-04-13 Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal Tapking, Christian Rontoyanni, Victoria G. Diehm, Yannick F. Strübing, Felix Solimani, Farzan Bigdeli, Amir K. Hundeshagen, Gabriel Fischer, Sebastian Kneser, Ulrich Siegwart, Laura C. J Clin Med Article The treatment of geriatric burn patients represents a major challenge in burn care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzymatic debridement (ED) in geriatric burn patients. Adult patients who received ED for treatment of mixed pattern and full thickness burns (August 2017–October 2022) were included in this study and grouped in the younger (18–65 years) and geriatric (≥65 years) groups. Primary outcome was a necessity of surgery subsequent to ED. Both groups (patient characteristics, surgical and non-surgical treatment) were compared. Multiple logistic and linear regression models were used to identify the effect of age on the outcomes. A total of 169 patients were included (younger group: 135 patients, geriatric group: 34 patients). The burn size as indicated by %TBSA (24.2 ± 20.4% vs. 26.8 ± 17.1%, p = 0.499) was similar in both groups. The ASA (2.5 ± 1.1 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and ABSI scores (6.1 ± 2.8 vs. 8.6 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the geriatric group. The %TBSA treated with ED (5.4 ± 5.0% vs. 4.4 ± 4.3%, p = 0.245) were similar in both groups. The necessity of additional surgical interventions (63.0 % vs. 58.8 %, p = 0.763) and the wound size debrided and grafted (2.9 ± 3.5% vs. 2.2 ± 2.1%; p = 0.301) were similar in both groups. Regression models yielded that age did not have an effect on efficacy of ED. We showed that ED is reliable and safe to use in geriatric patients. Age did not have a significant influence on the surgical outcomes of ED. In both groups, the size of the grafted area was reduced and, in many patients, surgery was avoided completely. MDPI 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10095072/ /pubmed/37048716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072633 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tapking, Christian
Rontoyanni, Victoria G.
Diehm, Yannick F.
Strübing, Felix
Solimani, Farzan
Bigdeli, Amir K.
Hundeshagen, Gabriel
Fischer, Sebastian
Kneser, Ulrich
Siegwart, Laura C.
Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal
title Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal
title_full Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal
title_fullStr Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal
title_full_unstemmed Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal
title_short Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal
title_sort enzymatic debridement in geriatric burn patients—a reliable option for selective eschar removal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072633
work_keys_str_mv AT tapkingchristian enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval
AT rontoyannivictoriag enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval
AT diehmyannickf enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval
AT strubingfelix enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval
AT solimanifarzan enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval
AT bigdeliamirk enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval
AT hundeshagengabriel enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval
AT fischersebastian enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval
AT kneserulrich enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval
AT siegwartlaurac enzymaticdebridementingeriatricburnpatientsareliableoptionforselectiveescharremoval