Cargando…

Association between Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Abnormal Glucose Risk: A Cohort Study

Background: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a predictor of chronic disease that is impractical to routinely measure in primary care settings. We used a new estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF) algorithm that uses information routinely documented in electronic health care records to predict...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sloan, Robert A., Kim, Youngdeok, Kenyon, Jonathan, Visentini-Scarzanella, Marco, Sawada, Susumu S., Sui, Xuemei, Lee, I-Min, Myers, Jonathan N., Lavie, Carl J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048823
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072740
_version_ 1785024078350909440
author Sloan, Robert A.
Kim, Youngdeok
Kenyon, Jonathan
Visentini-Scarzanella, Marco
Sawada, Susumu S.
Sui, Xuemei
Lee, I-Min
Myers, Jonathan N.
Lavie, Carl J.
author_facet Sloan, Robert A.
Kim, Youngdeok
Kenyon, Jonathan
Visentini-Scarzanella, Marco
Sawada, Susumu S.
Sui, Xuemei
Lee, I-Min
Myers, Jonathan N.
Lavie, Carl J.
author_sort Sloan, Robert A.
collection PubMed
description Background: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a predictor of chronic disease that is impractical to routinely measure in primary care settings. We used a new estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF) algorithm that uses information routinely documented in electronic health care records to predict abnormal blood glucose incidence. Methods: Participants were adults (17.8% female) 20–81 years old at baseline from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study between 1979 and 2006. eCRF was based on sex, age, body mass index, resting heart rate, resting blood pressure, and smoking status. CRF was measured by maximal treadmill testing. Cox proportional hazards regression models were established using eCRF and CRF as independent variables predicting the abnormal blood glucose incidence while adjusting for covariates (age, sex, exam year, waist girth, heavy drinking, smoking, and family history of diabetes mellitus and lipids). Results: Of 8602 participants at risk at baseline, 3580 (41.6%) developed abnormal blood glucose during an average of 4.9 years follow-up. The average eCRF of 12.03 ± 1.75 METs was equivalent to the CRF of 12.15 ± 2.40 METs within the 10% equivalence limit. In fully adjusted models, the estimated risks were the same (HRs = 0.96), eCRF (95% CIs = 0.93−0.99), and CRF (95% CI of 0.94−0.98). Each 1-MET increase was associated with a 4% reduced risk. Conclusions: Higher eCRF is associated with a lower risk of abnormal glucose. eCRF can be a vital sign used for research and prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10095416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100954162023-04-13 Association between Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Abnormal Glucose Risk: A Cohort Study Sloan, Robert A. Kim, Youngdeok Kenyon, Jonathan Visentini-Scarzanella, Marco Sawada, Susumu S. Sui, Xuemei Lee, I-Min Myers, Jonathan N. Lavie, Carl J. J Clin Med Article Background: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a predictor of chronic disease that is impractical to routinely measure in primary care settings. We used a new estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF) algorithm that uses information routinely documented in electronic health care records to predict abnormal blood glucose incidence. Methods: Participants were adults (17.8% female) 20–81 years old at baseline from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study between 1979 and 2006. eCRF was based on sex, age, body mass index, resting heart rate, resting blood pressure, and smoking status. CRF was measured by maximal treadmill testing. Cox proportional hazards regression models were established using eCRF and CRF as independent variables predicting the abnormal blood glucose incidence while adjusting for covariates (age, sex, exam year, waist girth, heavy drinking, smoking, and family history of diabetes mellitus and lipids). Results: Of 8602 participants at risk at baseline, 3580 (41.6%) developed abnormal blood glucose during an average of 4.9 years follow-up. The average eCRF of 12.03 ± 1.75 METs was equivalent to the CRF of 12.15 ± 2.40 METs within the 10% equivalence limit. In fully adjusted models, the estimated risks were the same (HRs = 0.96), eCRF (95% CIs = 0.93−0.99), and CRF (95% CI of 0.94−0.98). Each 1-MET increase was associated with a 4% reduced risk. Conclusions: Higher eCRF is associated with a lower risk of abnormal glucose. eCRF can be a vital sign used for research and prevention. MDPI 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10095416/ /pubmed/37048823 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072740 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sloan, Robert A.
Kim, Youngdeok
Kenyon, Jonathan
Visentini-Scarzanella, Marco
Sawada, Susumu S.
Sui, Xuemei
Lee, I-Min
Myers, Jonathan N.
Lavie, Carl J.
Association between Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Abnormal Glucose Risk: A Cohort Study
title Association between Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Abnormal Glucose Risk: A Cohort Study
title_full Association between Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Abnormal Glucose Risk: A Cohort Study
title_fullStr Association between Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Abnormal Glucose Risk: A Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Association between Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Abnormal Glucose Risk: A Cohort Study
title_short Association between Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Abnormal Glucose Risk: A Cohort Study
title_sort association between estimated cardiorespiratory fitness and abnormal glucose risk: a cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048823
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072740
work_keys_str_mv AT sloanroberta associationbetweenestimatedcardiorespiratoryfitnessandabnormalglucoseriskacohortstudy
AT kimyoungdeok associationbetweenestimatedcardiorespiratoryfitnessandabnormalglucoseriskacohortstudy
AT kenyonjonathan associationbetweenestimatedcardiorespiratoryfitnessandabnormalglucoseriskacohortstudy
AT visentiniscarzanellamarco associationbetweenestimatedcardiorespiratoryfitnessandabnormalglucoseriskacohortstudy
AT sawadasusumus associationbetweenestimatedcardiorespiratoryfitnessandabnormalglucoseriskacohortstudy
AT suixuemei associationbetweenestimatedcardiorespiratoryfitnessandabnormalglucoseriskacohortstudy
AT leeimin associationbetweenestimatedcardiorespiratoryfitnessandabnormalglucoseriskacohortstudy
AT myersjonathann associationbetweenestimatedcardiorespiratoryfitnessandabnormalglucoseriskacohortstudy
AT laviecarlj associationbetweenestimatedcardiorespiratoryfitnessandabnormalglucoseriskacohortstudy