Cargando…

Distal Flow Diversion with Anti-Thrombotically Coated and Bare Metal Low-Profile Flow Diverters—A Comparison

Background and purpose: The establishment of low-profile flow diverting stents (FDS), for example, the Silk Vista Baby (SVB) and the p48MW, facilitated endovascular treatment of peripheral cerebral aneurysms. This study therefore aims to compare the performance and outcomes of the SVB with those of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schüngel, Marie-Sophie, Hoffmann, Karl-Titus, Weber, Erik, Maybaum, Jens, Bailis, Nikolaos, Scheer, Maximilian, Nestler, Ulf, Schob, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048781
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072700
_version_ 1785024085753856000
author Schüngel, Marie-Sophie
Hoffmann, Karl-Titus
Weber, Erik
Maybaum, Jens
Bailis, Nikolaos
Scheer, Maximilian
Nestler, Ulf
Schob, Stefan
author_facet Schüngel, Marie-Sophie
Hoffmann, Karl-Titus
Weber, Erik
Maybaum, Jens
Bailis, Nikolaos
Scheer, Maximilian
Nestler, Ulf
Schob, Stefan
author_sort Schüngel, Marie-Sophie
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose: The establishment of low-profile flow diverting stents (FDS), for example, the Silk Vista Baby (SVB) and the p48MW, facilitated endovascular treatment of peripheral cerebral aneurysms. This study therefore aims to compare the performance and outcomes of the SVB with those of the p48MW HPC, with a special focus on hemodynamic aspects of peripheral segments and bifurcations. Materials and methods: The study cohort comprises 108 patients, who were either treated with the SVB or the p48MW HPC between June 2018 and April 2021. Results: Sixty patients received a SVB and forty-eight patients a p48MW HPC. The SVB was used predominantly in the AcomA-complex, and the p48MW HPC in the MCA bifurcation. Immediately after implantation, significant hemodynamic downgrading (OKM A2-A3, B1-B3, C3) was achieved in 60% in the SVB group vs. 75.1% in the p48MW HPC group. At the second follow-up, after an average of 8.8 and 10.9 months, respectively, OKM D1 was observed in 64.4% of the SVB group vs. 27.3% in the p48MW HPC group. Only 1.7% vs. 6.8% of the aneurysms remained morphologically unaltered (OKM A1). Adverse events with persisting neurologic sequalae at last follow-up were largely comparable in both groups (5.0% vs. 4.2%). Conclusion: Immediately after implantation, the p48MW HPC had a more profound hemodynamic impact than the SVB; however, early complete occlusions were achieved in a greater proportion of lesions after implantation of the uncoated SVB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10095446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100954462023-04-13 Distal Flow Diversion with Anti-Thrombotically Coated and Bare Metal Low-Profile Flow Diverters—A Comparison Schüngel, Marie-Sophie Hoffmann, Karl-Titus Weber, Erik Maybaum, Jens Bailis, Nikolaos Scheer, Maximilian Nestler, Ulf Schob, Stefan J Clin Med Article Background and purpose: The establishment of low-profile flow diverting stents (FDS), for example, the Silk Vista Baby (SVB) and the p48MW, facilitated endovascular treatment of peripheral cerebral aneurysms. This study therefore aims to compare the performance and outcomes of the SVB with those of the p48MW HPC, with a special focus on hemodynamic aspects of peripheral segments and bifurcations. Materials and methods: The study cohort comprises 108 patients, who were either treated with the SVB or the p48MW HPC between June 2018 and April 2021. Results: Sixty patients received a SVB and forty-eight patients a p48MW HPC. The SVB was used predominantly in the AcomA-complex, and the p48MW HPC in the MCA bifurcation. Immediately after implantation, significant hemodynamic downgrading (OKM A2-A3, B1-B3, C3) was achieved in 60% in the SVB group vs. 75.1% in the p48MW HPC group. At the second follow-up, after an average of 8.8 and 10.9 months, respectively, OKM D1 was observed in 64.4% of the SVB group vs. 27.3% in the p48MW HPC group. Only 1.7% vs. 6.8% of the aneurysms remained morphologically unaltered (OKM A1). Adverse events with persisting neurologic sequalae at last follow-up were largely comparable in both groups (5.0% vs. 4.2%). Conclusion: Immediately after implantation, the p48MW HPC had a more profound hemodynamic impact than the SVB; however, early complete occlusions were achieved in a greater proportion of lesions after implantation of the uncoated SVB. MDPI 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10095446/ /pubmed/37048781 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072700 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schüngel, Marie-Sophie
Hoffmann, Karl-Titus
Weber, Erik
Maybaum, Jens
Bailis, Nikolaos
Scheer, Maximilian
Nestler, Ulf
Schob, Stefan
Distal Flow Diversion with Anti-Thrombotically Coated and Bare Metal Low-Profile Flow Diverters—A Comparison
title Distal Flow Diversion with Anti-Thrombotically Coated and Bare Metal Low-Profile Flow Diverters—A Comparison
title_full Distal Flow Diversion with Anti-Thrombotically Coated and Bare Metal Low-Profile Flow Diverters—A Comparison
title_fullStr Distal Flow Diversion with Anti-Thrombotically Coated and Bare Metal Low-Profile Flow Diverters—A Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Distal Flow Diversion with Anti-Thrombotically Coated and Bare Metal Low-Profile Flow Diverters—A Comparison
title_short Distal Flow Diversion with Anti-Thrombotically Coated and Bare Metal Low-Profile Flow Diverters—A Comparison
title_sort distal flow diversion with anti-thrombotically coated and bare metal low-profile flow diverters—a comparison
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37048781
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072700
work_keys_str_mv AT schungelmariesophie distalflowdiversionwithantithromboticallycoatedandbaremetallowprofileflowdivertersacomparison
AT hoffmannkarltitus distalflowdiversionwithantithromboticallycoatedandbaremetallowprofileflowdivertersacomparison
AT webererik distalflowdiversionwithantithromboticallycoatedandbaremetallowprofileflowdivertersacomparison
AT maybaumjens distalflowdiversionwithantithromboticallycoatedandbaremetallowprofileflowdivertersacomparison
AT bailisnikolaos distalflowdiversionwithantithromboticallycoatedandbaremetallowprofileflowdivertersacomparison
AT scheermaximilian distalflowdiversionwithantithromboticallycoatedandbaremetallowprofileflowdivertersacomparison
AT nestlerulf distalflowdiversionwithantithromboticallycoatedandbaremetallowprofileflowdivertersacomparison
AT schobstefan distalflowdiversionwithantithromboticallycoatedandbaremetallowprofileflowdivertersacomparison