Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Guatemalan and Qing Dynasty Jadeite Elemental Signs

Different jadeites have different characteristics. In this paper, the La-ICP-MS test is used to compare and analyze the elemental characteristics of jadeite in Guatemala and the Qing dynasty. The test results show that the highest value of Guatemalan jadeite Ca can reach 2.5 apfu, while the highest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xinxin, Zhou, Qishen, Wang, Yanlin, Shu, Jun, Pan, Shaokui, Zhan, Fangmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37049882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073119
_version_ 1785024158004936704
author Liu, Xinxin
Zhou, Qishen
Wang, Yanlin
Shu, Jun
Pan, Shaokui
Zhan, Fangmin
author_facet Liu, Xinxin
Zhou, Qishen
Wang, Yanlin
Shu, Jun
Pan, Shaokui
Zhan, Fangmin
author_sort Liu, Xinxin
collection PubMed
description Different jadeites have different characteristics. In this paper, the La-ICP-MS test is used to compare and analyze the elemental characteristics of jadeite in Guatemala and the Qing dynasty. The test results show that the highest value of Guatemalan jadeite Ca can reach 2.5 apfu, while the highest value of Qing dynasty jadeite is 0.73 apfu. The highest value of Na is the same for both. The concentration distribution range and highest value of Guatemalan jadeite and Qing dynasty jadeite Mg/(Mg + Fe) are the same. Guatemalan jadeite and Qing dynasty jadeite have a very wide content of trace elements. Qing dynasty Ca/(Mg + Fe) distribution is wider. Concentrations of Guatemalan and Qing dynasty jadeite Sr/Ba, which is a marine sediment, are greater than 1. The Ba in the Qing dynasty jadeite sediments contains a large amount of clay, resulting in higher levels than the average amount in Guatemalan jadeite Ba. The standard distribution map is similar, showing a “horn” shape. The Sr distribution is uneven. Guatemalan jadeite is heavily enriched in rare earths. Eu shows positive and negative abnormalities. The total rare earth value is 8.15 ppm. Qing Dynasty jadeite shows light rare earth enrichment, and Eu is a positive anomaly. The total rare earth value is 7.07 ppm. The characteristics of the two elements are somewhat similar, but different, which does not rule out the possibility that Qing dynasty jadeite came from Guatemala.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10095750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100957502023-04-13 Comparative Analysis of Guatemalan and Qing Dynasty Jadeite Elemental Signs Liu, Xinxin Zhou, Qishen Wang, Yanlin Shu, Jun Pan, Shaokui Zhan, Fangmin Molecules Article Different jadeites have different characteristics. In this paper, the La-ICP-MS test is used to compare and analyze the elemental characteristics of jadeite in Guatemala and the Qing dynasty. The test results show that the highest value of Guatemalan jadeite Ca can reach 2.5 apfu, while the highest value of Qing dynasty jadeite is 0.73 apfu. The highest value of Na is the same for both. The concentration distribution range and highest value of Guatemalan jadeite and Qing dynasty jadeite Mg/(Mg + Fe) are the same. Guatemalan jadeite and Qing dynasty jadeite have a very wide content of trace elements. Qing dynasty Ca/(Mg + Fe) distribution is wider. Concentrations of Guatemalan and Qing dynasty jadeite Sr/Ba, which is a marine sediment, are greater than 1. The Ba in the Qing dynasty jadeite sediments contains a large amount of clay, resulting in higher levels than the average amount in Guatemalan jadeite Ba. The standard distribution map is similar, showing a “horn” shape. The Sr distribution is uneven. Guatemalan jadeite is heavily enriched in rare earths. Eu shows positive and negative abnormalities. The total rare earth value is 8.15 ppm. Qing Dynasty jadeite shows light rare earth enrichment, and Eu is a positive anomaly. The total rare earth value is 7.07 ppm. The characteristics of the two elements are somewhat similar, but different, which does not rule out the possibility that Qing dynasty jadeite came from Guatemala. MDPI 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10095750/ /pubmed/37049882 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073119 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Xinxin
Zhou, Qishen
Wang, Yanlin
Shu, Jun
Pan, Shaokui
Zhan, Fangmin
Comparative Analysis of Guatemalan and Qing Dynasty Jadeite Elemental Signs
title Comparative Analysis of Guatemalan and Qing Dynasty Jadeite Elemental Signs
title_full Comparative Analysis of Guatemalan and Qing Dynasty Jadeite Elemental Signs
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Guatemalan and Qing Dynasty Jadeite Elemental Signs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Guatemalan and Qing Dynasty Jadeite Elemental Signs
title_short Comparative Analysis of Guatemalan and Qing Dynasty Jadeite Elemental Signs
title_sort comparative analysis of guatemalan and qing dynasty jadeite elemental signs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10095750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37049882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073119
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxinxin comparativeanalysisofguatemalanandqingdynastyjadeiteelementalsigns
AT zhouqishen comparativeanalysisofguatemalanandqingdynastyjadeiteelementalsigns
AT wangyanlin comparativeanalysisofguatemalanandqingdynastyjadeiteelementalsigns
AT shujun comparativeanalysisofguatemalanandqingdynastyjadeiteelementalsigns
AT panshaokui comparativeanalysisofguatemalanandqingdynastyjadeiteelementalsigns
AT zhanfangmin comparativeanalysisofguatemalanandqingdynastyjadeiteelementalsigns