Cargando…

Evaluation of the Potential of Metakaolin, Electric Arc Furnace Slag, and Biomass Fly Ash for Geopolymer Cement Compositions †

The widespread use of geopolymer cement (GPC) has been hindered by a lack of scientific knowledge that still exists regarding its synthesis process. Key points, such as the release of aluminosilicate species from the raw materials and its link to the properties of GPC, have still not been completely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Archer de Carvalho, Tomás, Gaspar, Florindo, Marques, Ana C., Mateus, Artur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10096126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37049035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16072741
_version_ 1785024249546670080
author Archer de Carvalho, Tomás
Gaspar, Florindo
Marques, Ana C.
Mateus, Artur
author_facet Archer de Carvalho, Tomás
Gaspar, Florindo
Marques, Ana C.
Mateus, Artur
author_sort Archer de Carvalho, Tomás
collection PubMed
description The widespread use of geopolymer cement (GPC) has been hindered by a lack of scientific knowledge that still exists regarding its synthesis process. Key points, such as the release of aluminosilicate species from the raw materials and its link to the properties of GPC, have still not been completely studied. As a result, most of the GPC formulations covered in the literature are based on precursors’ elemental analysis using XRF (X-ray Fluorescence), or other equivalent analysis methods, and consider that the total aluminosilicate content of the precursors is available for participating in the geopolymerization process, which seems very unlikely. In this study, the amounts of aluminate and silicate species released from metakaolin (MK), electric arc furnace slag (EAFS), and biomass fly ash (BFA) in alkaline dissolution tests were determined by simple spectrophotometric methods. It was found that MK yields the highest aluminosilicate dissolution amount, about 2.1 mmol of silicate + aluminate per gram of MK, while EAFS and BFA yield about 0.53 and 0.32 mmol/g precursor, respectively. These results were used to estimate the total amounts of dissolved aluminosilicates in a series of GPC mortars prepared from these raw materials, which were thereafter subjected to mechanical tests. It was shown that the mortars’ compressive strength (which ranged from 1 to 63 MPa) is linearly correlated with their estimated total amount of dissolved aluminosilicates, with the best linear fit yielding a coefficient of determination above 0.99. It was concluded that by using the results of the dissolution tests, the estimation of compressive strength is greatly improved when compared to using the elemental analysis obtained by XRF, which yields a coefficient of determination of 0.88 and a larger dispersion of data points. The results reveal the usefulness of this simple method for evaluating the potential of inorganic industrial waste streams as precursors for GPC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10096126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100961262023-04-13 Evaluation of the Potential of Metakaolin, Electric Arc Furnace Slag, and Biomass Fly Ash for Geopolymer Cement Compositions † Archer de Carvalho, Tomás Gaspar, Florindo Marques, Ana C. Mateus, Artur Materials (Basel) Article The widespread use of geopolymer cement (GPC) has been hindered by a lack of scientific knowledge that still exists regarding its synthesis process. Key points, such as the release of aluminosilicate species from the raw materials and its link to the properties of GPC, have still not been completely studied. As a result, most of the GPC formulations covered in the literature are based on precursors’ elemental analysis using XRF (X-ray Fluorescence), or other equivalent analysis methods, and consider that the total aluminosilicate content of the precursors is available for participating in the geopolymerization process, which seems very unlikely. In this study, the amounts of aluminate and silicate species released from metakaolin (MK), electric arc furnace slag (EAFS), and biomass fly ash (BFA) in alkaline dissolution tests were determined by simple spectrophotometric methods. It was found that MK yields the highest aluminosilicate dissolution amount, about 2.1 mmol of silicate + aluminate per gram of MK, while EAFS and BFA yield about 0.53 and 0.32 mmol/g precursor, respectively. These results were used to estimate the total amounts of dissolved aluminosilicates in a series of GPC mortars prepared from these raw materials, which were thereafter subjected to mechanical tests. It was shown that the mortars’ compressive strength (which ranged from 1 to 63 MPa) is linearly correlated with their estimated total amount of dissolved aluminosilicates, with the best linear fit yielding a coefficient of determination above 0.99. It was concluded that by using the results of the dissolution tests, the estimation of compressive strength is greatly improved when compared to using the elemental analysis obtained by XRF, which yields a coefficient of determination of 0.88 and a larger dispersion of data points. The results reveal the usefulness of this simple method for evaluating the potential of inorganic industrial waste streams as precursors for GPC. MDPI 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10096126/ /pubmed/37049035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16072741 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Archer de Carvalho, Tomás
Gaspar, Florindo
Marques, Ana C.
Mateus, Artur
Evaluation of the Potential of Metakaolin, Electric Arc Furnace Slag, and Biomass Fly Ash for Geopolymer Cement Compositions †
title Evaluation of the Potential of Metakaolin, Electric Arc Furnace Slag, and Biomass Fly Ash for Geopolymer Cement Compositions †
title_full Evaluation of the Potential of Metakaolin, Electric Arc Furnace Slag, and Biomass Fly Ash for Geopolymer Cement Compositions †
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Potential of Metakaolin, Electric Arc Furnace Slag, and Biomass Fly Ash for Geopolymer Cement Compositions †
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Potential of Metakaolin, Electric Arc Furnace Slag, and Biomass Fly Ash for Geopolymer Cement Compositions †
title_short Evaluation of the Potential of Metakaolin, Electric Arc Furnace Slag, and Biomass Fly Ash for Geopolymer Cement Compositions †
title_sort evaluation of the potential of metakaolin, electric arc furnace slag, and biomass fly ash for geopolymer cement compositions †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10096126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37049035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16072741
work_keys_str_mv AT archerdecarvalhotomas evaluationofthepotentialofmetakaolinelectricarcfurnaceslagandbiomassflyashforgeopolymercementcompositions
AT gasparflorindo evaluationofthepotentialofmetakaolinelectricarcfurnaceslagandbiomassflyashforgeopolymercementcompositions
AT marquesanac evaluationofthepotentialofmetakaolinelectricarcfurnaceslagandbiomassflyashforgeopolymercementcompositions
AT mateusartur evaluationofthepotentialofmetakaolinelectricarcfurnaceslagandbiomassflyashforgeopolymercementcompositions