Cargando…
A Brief Review of Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCO): The Influence of Different Deposition Techniques on the Efficiency of Solar Cells
Global-warming-induced climate changes and socioeconomic issues increasingly stimulate reviews of renewable energy. Among energy-generation devices, solar cells are often considered as renewable sources of energy. Lately, transparent conducting oxides (TCOs) are playing a significant role as back/fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10096935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37049320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13071226 |
_version_ | 1785024458528915456 |
---|---|
author | Chavan, Ganesh T. Kim, Youngkuk Khokhar, Muhammad Quddamah Hussain, Shahzada Qamar Cho, Eun-Chel Yi, Junsin Ahmad, Zubair Rosaiah, Pitcheri Jeon, Chan-Wook |
author_facet | Chavan, Ganesh T. Kim, Youngkuk Khokhar, Muhammad Quddamah Hussain, Shahzada Qamar Cho, Eun-Chel Yi, Junsin Ahmad, Zubair Rosaiah, Pitcheri Jeon, Chan-Wook |
author_sort | Chavan, Ganesh T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Global-warming-induced climate changes and socioeconomic issues increasingly stimulate reviews of renewable energy. Among energy-generation devices, solar cells are often considered as renewable sources of energy. Lately, transparent conducting oxides (TCOs) are playing a significant role as back/front contact electrodes in silicon heterojunction solar cells (SHJ SCs). In particular, the optimized Sn-doped In(2)O(3) (ITO) has served as a capable TCO material to improve the efficiency of SHJ SCs, due to excellent physicochemical properties such as high transmittance, electrical conductivity, mobility, bandgap, and a low refractive index. The doped-ITO thin films had promising characteristics and helped in promoting the efficiency of SHJ SCs. Further, SHJ technology, together with an interdigitated back contact structure, achieved an outstanding efficiency of 26.7%. The present article discusses the deposition of TCO films by various techniques, parameters affecting TCO properties, characteristics of doped and undoped TCO materials, and their influence on SHJ SC efficiency, based on a review of ongoing research and development activities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10096935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100969352023-04-13 A Brief Review of Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCO): The Influence of Different Deposition Techniques on the Efficiency of Solar Cells Chavan, Ganesh T. Kim, Youngkuk Khokhar, Muhammad Quddamah Hussain, Shahzada Qamar Cho, Eun-Chel Yi, Junsin Ahmad, Zubair Rosaiah, Pitcheri Jeon, Chan-Wook Nanomaterials (Basel) Review Global-warming-induced climate changes and socioeconomic issues increasingly stimulate reviews of renewable energy. Among energy-generation devices, solar cells are often considered as renewable sources of energy. Lately, transparent conducting oxides (TCOs) are playing a significant role as back/front contact electrodes in silicon heterojunction solar cells (SHJ SCs). In particular, the optimized Sn-doped In(2)O(3) (ITO) has served as a capable TCO material to improve the efficiency of SHJ SCs, due to excellent physicochemical properties such as high transmittance, electrical conductivity, mobility, bandgap, and a low refractive index. The doped-ITO thin films had promising characteristics and helped in promoting the efficiency of SHJ SCs. Further, SHJ technology, together with an interdigitated back contact structure, achieved an outstanding efficiency of 26.7%. The present article discusses the deposition of TCO films by various techniques, parameters affecting TCO properties, characteristics of doped and undoped TCO materials, and their influence on SHJ SC efficiency, based on a review of ongoing research and development activities. MDPI 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10096935/ /pubmed/37049320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13071226 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Chavan, Ganesh T. Kim, Youngkuk Khokhar, Muhammad Quddamah Hussain, Shahzada Qamar Cho, Eun-Chel Yi, Junsin Ahmad, Zubair Rosaiah, Pitcheri Jeon, Chan-Wook A Brief Review of Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCO): The Influence of Different Deposition Techniques on the Efficiency of Solar Cells |
title | A Brief Review of Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCO): The Influence of Different Deposition Techniques on the Efficiency of Solar Cells |
title_full | A Brief Review of Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCO): The Influence of Different Deposition Techniques on the Efficiency of Solar Cells |
title_fullStr | A Brief Review of Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCO): The Influence of Different Deposition Techniques on the Efficiency of Solar Cells |
title_full_unstemmed | A Brief Review of Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCO): The Influence of Different Deposition Techniques on the Efficiency of Solar Cells |
title_short | A Brief Review of Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCO): The Influence of Different Deposition Techniques on the Efficiency of Solar Cells |
title_sort | brief review of transparent conducting oxides (tco): the influence of different deposition techniques on the efficiency of solar cells |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10096935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37049320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13071226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chavanganesht abriefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT kimyoungkuk abriefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT khokharmuhammadquddamah abriefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT hussainshahzadaqamar abriefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT choeunchel abriefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT yijunsin abriefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT ahmadzubair abriefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT rosaiahpitcheri abriefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT jeonchanwook abriefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT chavanganesht briefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT kimyoungkuk briefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT khokharmuhammadquddamah briefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT hussainshahzadaqamar briefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT choeunchel briefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT yijunsin briefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT ahmadzubair briefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT rosaiahpitcheri briefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells AT jeonchanwook briefreviewoftransparentconductingoxidestcotheinfluenceofdifferentdepositiontechniquesontheefficiencyofsolarcells |