Cargando…

Validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the self‐evaluation of negative symptoms

The negative symptoms of schizophrenia can be present at any clinical stage, but evaluating the negative symptoms always remains challenging. To screen the negative symptoms effectively, self‐evaluation should be introduced. To date, professional psychiatrists used almost all of the scales available...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Guangdong, Chen, Jiayue, Tian, Hongjun, Lin, Chongguang, Zhu, Jingjing, Ping, Jing, Chen, Langlang, Zhuo, Chuanjun, Jiang, Deguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2924
_version_ 1785024485367218176
author Chen, Guangdong
Chen, Jiayue
Tian, Hongjun
Lin, Chongguang
Zhu, Jingjing
Ping, Jing
Chen, Langlang
Zhuo, Chuanjun
Jiang, Deguo
author_facet Chen, Guangdong
Chen, Jiayue
Tian, Hongjun
Lin, Chongguang
Zhu, Jingjing
Ping, Jing
Chen, Langlang
Zhuo, Chuanjun
Jiang, Deguo
author_sort Chen, Guangdong
collection PubMed
description The negative symptoms of schizophrenia can be present at any clinical stage, but evaluating the negative symptoms always remains challenging. To screen the negative symptoms effectively, self‐evaluation should be introduced. To date, professional psychiatrists used almost all of the scales available to screen the negative symptoms but could not obtain an accurate outcome. At the same time, an advanced self‐assessment scale is needed to accompany the patients’ self‐feeling‐based treatment strategies to understand their feelings about their symptoms. Hence, Chinese self‐evaluation of negative symptoms (SNS) should be introduced in China. This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of SNS. Two hundred patients with schizophrenia were included in this study and were evaluated entirely with the self‐assessed negative symptoms by the Chinese version. The correlation analysis was performed between SNS and the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) to assess the criterion validity of SNS for screening negative symptoms. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the constructive validity of the SNS. Two senior professional psychiatrists were involved in this assessment based on their clinical experience and capability to define the severity of the negative symptoms. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the cutoff point of SNS. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient were used to determine the reliability of SNS. We have the following findings: The Chinese version of SNS demonstrated a significant correlation with the SANS (r = .774, p < .05). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that the factor loading varies from .442 to .788. ROC analysis demonstrated that at SNS ≥ 8, the patients demonstrated a mild severity of negative symptoms, and at SNS ≥ 15, the patients demonstrated a severe severity of negative symptoms. Subsequently, 9 < SNS < 14 was defined as a moderate severity of negative symptoms. The Cronbach's alpha and ICC coefficients of the Chinese version SNS were .877 and .774, respectively. Our results showed that the acceptable validity and reliability of the Chinese version of SNS confirmed that SNS is an ideal tool for self‐assessment of the negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10097046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100970462023-04-13 Validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the self‐evaluation of negative symptoms Chen, Guangdong Chen, Jiayue Tian, Hongjun Lin, Chongguang Zhu, Jingjing Ping, Jing Chen, Langlang Zhuo, Chuanjun Jiang, Deguo Brain Behav Original Articles The negative symptoms of schizophrenia can be present at any clinical stage, but evaluating the negative symptoms always remains challenging. To screen the negative symptoms effectively, self‐evaluation should be introduced. To date, professional psychiatrists used almost all of the scales available to screen the negative symptoms but could not obtain an accurate outcome. At the same time, an advanced self‐assessment scale is needed to accompany the patients’ self‐feeling‐based treatment strategies to understand their feelings about their symptoms. Hence, Chinese self‐evaluation of negative symptoms (SNS) should be introduced in China. This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of SNS. Two hundred patients with schizophrenia were included in this study and were evaluated entirely with the self‐assessed negative symptoms by the Chinese version. The correlation analysis was performed between SNS and the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) to assess the criterion validity of SNS for screening negative symptoms. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the constructive validity of the SNS. Two senior professional psychiatrists were involved in this assessment based on their clinical experience and capability to define the severity of the negative symptoms. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the cutoff point of SNS. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient were used to determine the reliability of SNS. We have the following findings: The Chinese version of SNS demonstrated a significant correlation with the SANS (r = .774, p < .05). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that the factor loading varies from .442 to .788. ROC analysis demonstrated that at SNS ≥ 8, the patients demonstrated a mild severity of negative symptoms, and at SNS ≥ 15, the patients demonstrated a severe severity of negative symptoms. Subsequently, 9 < SNS < 14 was defined as a moderate severity of negative symptoms. The Cronbach's alpha and ICC coefficients of the Chinese version SNS were .877 and .774, respectively. Our results showed that the acceptable validity and reliability of the Chinese version of SNS confirmed that SNS is an ideal tool for self‐assessment of the negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10097046/ /pubmed/36908244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2924 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chen, Guangdong
Chen, Jiayue
Tian, Hongjun
Lin, Chongguang
Zhu, Jingjing
Ping, Jing
Chen, Langlang
Zhuo, Chuanjun
Jiang, Deguo
Validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the self‐evaluation of negative symptoms
title Validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the self‐evaluation of negative symptoms
title_full Validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the self‐evaluation of negative symptoms
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the self‐evaluation of negative symptoms
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the self‐evaluation of negative symptoms
title_short Validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the self‐evaluation of negative symptoms
title_sort validity and reliability of a chinese version of the self‐evaluation of negative symptoms
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2924
work_keys_str_mv AT chenguangdong validityandreliabilityofachineseversionoftheselfevaluationofnegativesymptoms
AT chenjiayue validityandreliabilityofachineseversionoftheselfevaluationofnegativesymptoms
AT tianhongjun validityandreliabilityofachineseversionoftheselfevaluationofnegativesymptoms
AT linchongguang validityandreliabilityofachineseversionoftheselfevaluationofnegativesymptoms
AT zhujingjing validityandreliabilityofachineseversionoftheselfevaluationofnegativesymptoms
AT pingjing validityandreliabilityofachineseversionoftheselfevaluationofnegativesymptoms
AT chenlanglang validityandreliabilityofachineseversionoftheselfevaluationofnegativesymptoms
AT zhuochuanjun validityandreliabilityofachineseversionoftheselfevaluationofnegativesymptoms
AT jiangdeguo validityandreliabilityofachineseversionoftheselfevaluationofnegativesymptoms