Cargando…
Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons
Biostimulants help plants cope with environmental stresses and improve vegetable yield and quality. This study was conducted to determine the protein hydrolysate (PH) effect of three different durations (weekly applications: three, six, or nine times plus an untreated control) in factorial combinati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12071423 |
_version_ | 1785024485839077376 |
---|---|
author | Tallarita, Alessio V. Vecchietti, Lorenzo Golubkina, Nadezhda A. Sekara, Agnieszka Cozzolino, Eugenio Mirabella, Massimo Cuciniello, Antonio Maiello, Roberto Cenvinzo, Vincenzo Lombardi, Pasquale Caruso, Gianluca |
author_facet | Tallarita, Alessio V. Vecchietti, Lorenzo Golubkina, Nadezhda A. Sekara, Agnieszka Cozzolino, Eugenio Mirabella, Massimo Cuciniello, Antonio Maiello, Roberto Cenvinzo, Vincenzo Lombardi, Pasquale Caruso, Gianluca |
author_sort | Tallarita, Alessio V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biostimulants help plants cope with environmental stresses and improve vegetable yield and quality. This study was conducted to determine the protein hydrolysate (PH) effect of three different durations (weekly applications: three, six, or nine times plus an untreated control) in factorial combination with four soil electrical conductivities (EC: 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, or 6.0 mS·cm(−1)) on yield, fruit quality, and elemental composition of tomato ‘miniplum’ grown in a greenhouse. Fruit yield was best affected, during the summer, by six and nine biostimulant applications at EC 3.0 mS·cm(−1), and in the same season, the six treatments led to the highest fruit number with no difference compared to nine applications; during the winter, the three and six treatments improved the mentioned variables at each EC level. Fruits’ dry residue and Brix(o) were positively affected by biostimulation both in summer and winter. In summer, the 6.0 mS·cm(−1) EC led to the highest dry residue and Brix(o) values, though the latter did not show any significant difference compared to 4.5 mS·cm(−1); in winter, the best results corresponded to 4.5 and 6.0 mS·cm(−1). A higher beneficial effect of PH on fruit antioxidant status, i.e., lycopene, polyphenols, ascorbic acid levels, and lipophilic (LAA) and hydrophilic (HAA) activity, was recorded in winter compared with summer. Positive correlations between polyphenols and LAA, as well as ascorbic acid content and HAA were found for all EC and PH treatments. Most of the mineral elements tested demonstrated concentration stability, whereas the highest EC decreased P, Mg, Cu, and Se accumulation. The opposite effect was shown by PH application on Se and Mn levels, with P tending to increase. The concentrations of Fe, Zn, and Cu were the lowest under the longest duration of PH supply. These results further confirm the essential role of plant biostimulation in enhancing tomato yield and quality, with a particular focus on the treatment duration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10097048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100970482023-04-13 Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons Tallarita, Alessio V. Vecchietti, Lorenzo Golubkina, Nadezhda A. Sekara, Agnieszka Cozzolino, Eugenio Mirabella, Massimo Cuciniello, Antonio Maiello, Roberto Cenvinzo, Vincenzo Lombardi, Pasquale Caruso, Gianluca Plants (Basel) Article Biostimulants help plants cope with environmental stresses and improve vegetable yield and quality. This study was conducted to determine the protein hydrolysate (PH) effect of three different durations (weekly applications: three, six, or nine times plus an untreated control) in factorial combination with four soil electrical conductivities (EC: 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, or 6.0 mS·cm(−1)) on yield, fruit quality, and elemental composition of tomato ‘miniplum’ grown in a greenhouse. Fruit yield was best affected, during the summer, by six and nine biostimulant applications at EC 3.0 mS·cm(−1), and in the same season, the six treatments led to the highest fruit number with no difference compared to nine applications; during the winter, the three and six treatments improved the mentioned variables at each EC level. Fruits’ dry residue and Brix(o) were positively affected by biostimulation both in summer and winter. In summer, the 6.0 mS·cm(−1) EC led to the highest dry residue and Brix(o) values, though the latter did not show any significant difference compared to 4.5 mS·cm(−1); in winter, the best results corresponded to 4.5 and 6.0 mS·cm(−1). A higher beneficial effect of PH on fruit antioxidant status, i.e., lycopene, polyphenols, ascorbic acid levels, and lipophilic (LAA) and hydrophilic (HAA) activity, was recorded in winter compared with summer. Positive correlations between polyphenols and LAA, as well as ascorbic acid content and HAA were found for all EC and PH treatments. Most of the mineral elements tested demonstrated concentration stability, whereas the highest EC decreased P, Mg, Cu, and Se accumulation. The opposite effect was shown by PH application on Se and Mn levels, with P tending to increase. The concentrations of Fe, Zn, and Cu were the lowest under the longest duration of PH supply. These results further confirm the essential role of plant biostimulation in enhancing tomato yield and quality, with a particular focus on the treatment duration. MDPI 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10097048/ /pubmed/37050049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12071423 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tallarita, Alessio V. Vecchietti, Lorenzo Golubkina, Nadezhda A. Sekara, Agnieszka Cozzolino, Eugenio Mirabella, Massimo Cuciniello, Antonio Maiello, Roberto Cenvinzo, Vincenzo Lombardi, Pasquale Caruso, Gianluca Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons |
title | Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons |
title_full | Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons |
title_fullStr | Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons |
title_short | Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons |
title_sort | effects of plant biostimulation time span and soil electrical conductivity on greenhouse tomato ‘miniplum’ yield and quality in diverse crop seasons |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12071423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tallaritaalessiov effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons AT vecchiettilorenzo effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons AT golubkinanadezhdaa effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons AT sekaraagnieszka effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons AT cozzolinoeugenio effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons AT mirabellamassimo effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons AT cucinielloantonio effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons AT maielloroberto effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons AT cenvinzovincenzo effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons AT lombardipasquale effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons AT carusogianluca effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons |