Cargando…

Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons

Biostimulants help plants cope with environmental stresses and improve vegetable yield and quality. This study was conducted to determine the protein hydrolysate (PH) effect of three different durations (weekly applications: three, six, or nine times plus an untreated control) in factorial combinati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tallarita, Alessio V., Vecchietti, Lorenzo, Golubkina, Nadezhda A., Sekara, Agnieszka, Cozzolino, Eugenio, Mirabella, Massimo, Cuciniello, Antonio, Maiello, Roberto, Cenvinzo, Vincenzo, Lombardi, Pasquale, Caruso, Gianluca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050049
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12071423
_version_ 1785024485839077376
author Tallarita, Alessio V.
Vecchietti, Lorenzo
Golubkina, Nadezhda A.
Sekara, Agnieszka
Cozzolino, Eugenio
Mirabella, Massimo
Cuciniello, Antonio
Maiello, Roberto
Cenvinzo, Vincenzo
Lombardi, Pasquale
Caruso, Gianluca
author_facet Tallarita, Alessio V.
Vecchietti, Lorenzo
Golubkina, Nadezhda A.
Sekara, Agnieszka
Cozzolino, Eugenio
Mirabella, Massimo
Cuciniello, Antonio
Maiello, Roberto
Cenvinzo, Vincenzo
Lombardi, Pasquale
Caruso, Gianluca
author_sort Tallarita, Alessio V.
collection PubMed
description Biostimulants help plants cope with environmental stresses and improve vegetable yield and quality. This study was conducted to determine the protein hydrolysate (PH) effect of three different durations (weekly applications: three, six, or nine times plus an untreated control) in factorial combination with four soil electrical conductivities (EC: 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, or 6.0 mS·cm(−1)) on yield, fruit quality, and elemental composition of tomato ‘miniplum’ grown in a greenhouse. Fruit yield was best affected, during the summer, by six and nine biostimulant applications at EC 3.0 mS·cm(−1), and in the same season, the six treatments led to the highest fruit number with no difference compared to nine applications; during the winter, the three and six treatments improved the mentioned variables at each EC level. Fruits’ dry residue and Brix(o) were positively affected by biostimulation both in summer and winter. In summer, the 6.0 mS·cm(−1) EC led to the highest dry residue and Brix(o) values, though the latter did not show any significant difference compared to 4.5 mS·cm(−1); in winter, the best results corresponded to 4.5 and 6.0 mS·cm(−1). A higher beneficial effect of PH on fruit antioxidant status, i.e., lycopene, polyphenols, ascorbic acid levels, and lipophilic (LAA) and hydrophilic (HAA) activity, was recorded in winter compared with summer. Positive correlations between polyphenols and LAA, as well as ascorbic acid content and HAA were found for all EC and PH treatments. Most of the mineral elements tested demonstrated concentration stability, whereas the highest EC decreased P, Mg, Cu, and Se accumulation. The opposite effect was shown by PH application on Se and Mn levels, with P tending to increase. The concentrations of Fe, Zn, and Cu were the lowest under the longest duration of PH supply. These results further confirm the essential role of plant biostimulation in enhancing tomato yield and quality, with a particular focus on the treatment duration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10097048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100970482023-04-13 Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons Tallarita, Alessio V. Vecchietti, Lorenzo Golubkina, Nadezhda A. Sekara, Agnieszka Cozzolino, Eugenio Mirabella, Massimo Cuciniello, Antonio Maiello, Roberto Cenvinzo, Vincenzo Lombardi, Pasquale Caruso, Gianluca Plants (Basel) Article Biostimulants help plants cope with environmental stresses and improve vegetable yield and quality. This study was conducted to determine the protein hydrolysate (PH) effect of three different durations (weekly applications: three, six, or nine times plus an untreated control) in factorial combination with four soil electrical conductivities (EC: 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, or 6.0 mS·cm(−1)) on yield, fruit quality, and elemental composition of tomato ‘miniplum’ grown in a greenhouse. Fruit yield was best affected, during the summer, by six and nine biostimulant applications at EC 3.0 mS·cm(−1), and in the same season, the six treatments led to the highest fruit number with no difference compared to nine applications; during the winter, the three and six treatments improved the mentioned variables at each EC level. Fruits’ dry residue and Brix(o) were positively affected by biostimulation both in summer and winter. In summer, the 6.0 mS·cm(−1) EC led to the highest dry residue and Brix(o) values, though the latter did not show any significant difference compared to 4.5 mS·cm(−1); in winter, the best results corresponded to 4.5 and 6.0 mS·cm(−1). A higher beneficial effect of PH on fruit antioxidant status, i.e., lycopene, polyphenols, ascorbic acid levels, and lipophilic (LAA) and hydrophilic (HAA) activity, was recorded in winter compared with summer. Positive correlations between polyphenols and LAA, as well as ascorbic acid content and HAA were found for all EC and PH treatments. Most of the mineral elements tested demonstrated concentration stability, whereas the highest EC decreased P, Mg, Cu, and Se accumulation. The opposite effect was shown by PH application on Se and Mn levels, with P tending to increase. The concentrations of Fe, Zn, and Cu were the lowest under the longest duration of PH supply. These results further confirm the essential role of plant biostimulation in enhancing tomato yield and quality, with a particular focus on the treatment duration. MDPI 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10097048/ /pubmed/37050049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12071423 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tallarita, Alessio V.
Vecchietti, Lorenzo
Golubkina, Nadezhda A.
Sekara, Agnieszka
Cozzolino, Eugenio
Mirabella, Massimo
Cuciniello, Antonio
Maiello, Roberto
Cenvinzo, Vincenzo
Lombardi, Pasquale
Caruso, Gianluca
Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons
title Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons
title_full Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons
title_fullStr Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons
title_short Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato ‘Miniplum’ Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons
title_sort effects of plant biostimulation time span and soil electrical conductivity on greenhouse tomato ‘miniplum’ yield and quality in diverse crop seasons
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050049
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12071423
work_keys_str_mv AT tallaritaalessiov effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons
AT vecchiettilorenzo effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons
AT golubkinanadezhdaa effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons
AT sekaraagnieszka effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons
AT cozzolinoeugenio effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons
AT mirabellamassimo effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons
AT cucinielloantonio effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons
AT maielloroberto effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons
AT cenvinzovincenzo effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons
AT lombardipasquale effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons
AT carusogianluca effectsofplantbiostimulationtimespanandsoilelectricalconductivityongreenhousetomatominiplumyieldandqualityindiversecropseasons