Cargando…
Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus
In this paper we describe an automated detection algorithm that objectively detects pulsatile tinnitus (PT) and investigate its performance. DESIGN: Sound measurements were made with a sensitive microphone placed in the outer ear canal in 36 PT-patients referred to our tertiary clinic, along with a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001301 |
_version_ | 1785024584685191168 |
---|---|
author | Ubbink, Sander W.J. van Dijk, J. Marc C. Hofman, Rutger van Dijk, Pim |
author_facet | Ubbink, Sander W.J. van Dijk, J. Marc C. Hofman, Rutger van Dijk, Pim |
author_sort | Ubbink, Sander W.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper we describe an automated detection algorithm that objectively detects pulsatile tinnitus (PT) and investigate its performance. DESIGN: Sound measurements were made with a sensitive microphone placed in the outer ear canal in 36 PT-patients referred to our tertiary clinic, along with a registration of the heart rate. A novel algorithm expressed the coherence between the recorded sound and heart rate as a pulsatility index. This index was determined for 6 octave bands of the recorded sound. We assessed the performance of the detection algorithm by comparing it with the judgement of 3 blinded observers. RESULTS: The algorithm showed good agreement compared with the majority judgement of the blinded observers (ROC AUC 0.83). Interobserver reliability for detecting PT in sound recordings by the three blinded observers was substantial (Fleiss’s κ=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm may be a reliable alternative to subjective assessments of in-canal sound measurements in PT-patients, thus providing clinicians with an objective measure to differentiate between subjective and objective pulsatile tinnitus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10097480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100974802023-04-13 Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus Ubbink, Sander W.J. van Dijk, J. Marc C. Hofman, Rutger van Dijk, Pim Ear Hear Brief Reports In this paper we describe an automated detection algorithm that objectively detects pulsatile tinnitus (PT) and investigate its performance. DESIGN: Sound measurements were made with a sensitive microphone placed in the outer ear canal in 36 PT-patients referred to our tertiary clinic, along with a registration of the heart rate. A novel algorithm expressed the coherence between the recorded sound and heart rate as a pulsatility index. This index was determined for 6 octave bands of the recorded sound. We assessed the performance of the detection algorithm by comparing it with the judgement of 3 blinded observers. RESULTS: The algorithm showed good agreement compared with the majority judgement of the blinded observers (ROC AUC 0.83). Interobserver reliability for detecting PT in sound recordings by the three blinded observers was substantial (Fleiss’s κ=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm may be a reliable alternative to subjective assessments of in-canal sound measurements in PT-patients, thus providing clinicians with an objective measure to differentiate between subjective and objective pulsatile tinnitus. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10097480/ /pubmed/36395514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001301 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Reports Ubbink, Sander W.J. van Dijk, J. Marc C. Hofman, Rutger van Dijk, Pim Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus |
title | Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus |
title_full | Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus |
title_fullStr | Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus |
title_short | Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus |
title_sort | performance of an automated detection algorithm to assess objective pulsatile tinnitus |
topic | Brief Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001301 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ubbinksanderwj performanceofanautomateddetectionalgorithmtoassessobjectivepulsatiletinnitus AT vandijkjmarcc performanceofanautomateddetectionalgorithmtoassessobjectivepulsatiletinnitus AT hofmanrutger performanceofanautomateddetectionalgorithmtoassessobjectivepulsatiletinnitus AT vandijkpim performanceofanautomateddetectionalgorithmtoassessobjectivepulsatiletinnitus |