Cargando…

Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus

In this paper we describe an automated detection algorithm that objectively detects pulsatile tinnitus (PT) and investigate its performance. DESIGN: Sound measurements were made with a sensitive microphone placed in the outer ear canal in 36 PT-patients referred to our tertiary clinic, along with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ubbink, Sander W.J., van Dijk, J. Marc C., Hofman, Rutger, van Dijk, Pim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001301
_version_ 1785024584685191168
author Ubbink, Sander W.J.
van Dijk, J. Marc C.
Hofman, Rutger
van Dijk, Pim
author_facet Ubbink, Sander W.J.
van Dijk, J. Marc C.
Hofman, Rutger
van Dijk, Pim
author_sort Ubbink, Sander W.J.
collection PubMed
description In this paper we describe an automated detection algorithm that objectively detects pulsatile tinnitus (PT) and investigate its performance. DESIGN: Sound measurements were made with a sensitive microphone placed in the outer ear canal in 36 PT-patients referred to our tertiary clinic, along with a registration of the heart rate. A novel algorithm expressed the coherence between the recorded sound and heart rate as a pulsatility index. This index was determined for 6 octave bands of the recorded sound. We assessed the performance of the detection algorithm by comparing it with the judgement of 3 blinded observers. RESULTS: The algorithm showed good agreement compared with the majority judgement of the blinded observers (ROC AUC 0.83). Interobserver reliability for detecting PT in sound recordings by the three blinded observers was substantial (Fleiss’s κ=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm may be a reliable alternative to subjective assessments of in-canal sound measurements in PT-patients, thus providing clinicians with an objective measure to differentiate between subjective and objective pulsatile tinnitus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10097480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100974802023-04-13 Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus Ubbink, Sander W.J. van Dijk, J. Marc C. Hofman, Rutger van Dijk, Pim Ear Hear Brief Reports In this paper we describe an automated detection algorithm that objectively detects pulsatile tinnitus (PT) and investigate its performance. DESIGN: Sound measurements were made with a sensitive microphone placed in the outer ear canal in 36 PT-patients referred to our tertiary clinic, along with a registration of the heart rate. A novel algorithm expressed the coherence between the recorded sound and heart rate as a pulsatility index. This index was determined for 6 octave bands of the recorded sound. We assessed the performance of the detection algorithm by comparing it with the judgement of 3 blinded observers. RESULTS: The algorithm showed good agreement compared with the majority judgement of the blinded observers (ROC AUC 0.83). Interobserver reliability for detecting PT in sound recordings by the three blinded observers was substantial (Fleiss’s κ=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm may be a reliable alternative to subjective assessments of in-canal sound measurements in PT-patients, thus providing clinicians with an objective measure to differentiate between subjective and objective pulsatile tinnitus. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10097480/ /pubmed/36395514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001301 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Reports
Ubbink, Sander W.J.
van Dijk, J. Marc C.
Hofman, Rutger
van Dijk, Pim
Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus
title Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus
title_full Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus
title_fullStr Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus
title_full_unstemmed Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus
title_short Performance of an Automated Detection Algorithm to Assess Objective Pulsatile Tinnitus
title_sort performance of an automated detection algorithm to assess objective pulsatile tinnitus
topic Brief Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001301
work_keys_str_mv AT ubbinksanderwj performanceofanautomateddetectionalgorithmtoassessobjectivepulsatiletinnitus
AT vandijkjmarcc performanceofanautomateddetectionalgorithmtoassessobjectivepulsatiletinnitus
AT hofmanrutger performanceofanautomateddetectionalgorithmtoassessobjectivepulsatiletinnitus
AT vandijkpim performanceofanautomateddetectionalgorithmtoassessobjectivepulsatiletinnitus