Cargando…

Neuromuscular Correlates of the Contralateral Stretch-induced Strength Loss

PURPOSE: The current study investigated the effects of unilateral passive stretching on the neuromuscular mechanisms involved in the force-generating capacity of the contralateral muscle. METHODS: Twenty-six healthy men underwent unilateral passive stretching of the plantarflexors (5 × 45 s on + 15...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: CORATELLA, GIUSEPPE, CÈ, EMILIANO, DORIA, CHRISTIAN, BORRELLI, MARTA, LONGO, STEFANO, ESPOSITO, FABIO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33831897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002677
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The current study investigated the effects of unilateral passive stretching on the neuromuscular mechanisms involved in the force-generating capacity of the contralateral muscle. METHODS: Twenty-six healthy men underwent unilateral passive stretching of the plantarflexors (5 × 45 s on + 15 s off; total stretching time, 225 s). Before and after the stretching protocol, contralateral ankle range of motion, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the plantarflexors, and surface electromyographic root-mean-square (sEMG RMS) of the soleus and the gastrocnemii muscles were determined. Concurrently, V-wave, maximum and superimposed H-reflex, and M-wave were elicited via nerve stimulation to estimate the supraspinal, spinal, and peripheral mechanisms, respectively. sEMG RMS, V-wave, and H-reflex were normalized to the M-wave. RESULTS: After passive stretching, contralateral ankle range of motion was increased (+8% [1%/15%], effect size [ES] = 0.43 [0.02/0.84], P < 0.001), MVC of the plantarflexors was decreased (−9% [−21%/−2%], ES = −0.96 [−1.53/−0.38], P < 0.001), and the sEMG RMS/M-wave of the soleus and the gastrocnemii muscles was decreased (≈−9%, ES ≈ −0.33, P < 0.05). Concurrently, the V-wave/M-wave superimposed was decreased in all muscles (≈−13%, ES = −0.81 to −0.52, P < 0.05). No change in H-reflex/M-wave and M-wave was observed under both maximum and superimposed condition. The decrease in the MVC and the sEMG RMS of the contralateral muscle was accompanied by a decrease in the V-wave/M-wave but not the H-reflex/M-wave ratios and the M-wave. CONCLUSIONS: The present outcomes suggest that only supraspinal mechanisms might be involved in the contralateral decrease in the maximum force-generating capacity.