Cargando…

Phase III Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of OSS Versus PEG + Electrolyte Colonoscopy Preparation in Adolescents

Many protocols and preparations are used for bowel cleansing before pediatric colonoscopy but few are based on scientific evidence. We evaluated efficacy, safety, tolerability, and patient preference of oral sulfate solution (OSS) at 75% of the adult dose versus polyethylene glycol (PEG)-electrolyte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Socha, Piotr, Posovszky, Carsten, Szychta, Monika, Viscogliosi, Federica, Martemucci, Luigi, Grzybowska-Chlebowczyk, Urszula, Perrot, Valerie, Kornowski, Anne, Benninga, Marc A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36821851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000003745
_version_ 1785024586449944576
author Socha, Piotr
Posovszky, Carsten
Szychta, Monika
Viscogliosi, Federica
Martemucci, Luigi
Grzybowska-Chlebowczyk, Urszula
Perrot, Valerie
Kornowski, Anne
Benninga, Marc A.
author_facet Socha, Piotr
Posovszky, Carsten
Szychta, Monika
Viscogliosi, Federica
Martemucci, Luigi
Grzybowska-Chlebowczyk, Urszula
Perrot, Valerie
Kornowski, Anne
Benninga, Marc A.
author_sort Socha, Piotr
collection PubMed
description Many protocols and preparations are used for bowel cleansing before pediatric colonoscopy but few are based on scientific evidence. We evaluated efficacy, safety, tolerability, and patient preference of oral sulfate solution (OSS) at 75% of the adult dose versus polyethylene glycol (PEG)-electrolyte solution in adolescents presenting for diagnostic colonoscopy. METHODS: Phase III, randomized, evaluator-blinded, non-inferiority study of OSS and PEG in adolescents aged 12–17 years. OSS and PEG were administered in 2 doses on the day before colonoscopy. Primary endpoint included proportion of patients with successful overall preparation (4-point scale). Secondary endpoints included overall and segmental bowel cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale; BBPS), completed colonoscopies, duration of examination, time to cecal intubation, proportion of nasogastric tubes (NGTs), adverse events (AEs) and acceptability. RESULTS: Successful cleansing was achieved in 71.4% and 79.0% of patients receiving OSS and PEG, respectively [adjusted difference −7.61 (95% confidence interval, CI, −18.45 to 3.24); P = 0.0907]. Segmental BBPS score for the left and transverse colon were similar between treatment groups, but better for the right colon with PEG than OSS [2.2 (95% CI, 2.0–2.4) and 1.9 (95% CI, 1.7–2.1), respectively; P = 0.0015]. Significantly fewer OSS patients needed NGT placement to ingest the whole solution [9/125 (7.2%)] than PEG patients [36/116 (31.0%); P < 0.0001]. Treatment acceptability was significantly higher with OSS than PEG (P < 0.0001). Duration of examination, completed colonoscopies, and time to cecal intubation were similar between preparations. Gastrointestinal AEs including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and distension were similar in both groups but more patients receiving PEG had AEs assessed as incapacitating. CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority of OSS to PEG was not demonstrated, but OSS was associated with a lower requirement for NGT, better acceptability, and less frequent severe AEs than with PEG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10097489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100974892023-04-13 Phase III Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of OSS Versus PEG + Electrolyte Colonoscopy Preparation in Adolescents Socha, Piotr Posovszky, Carsten Szychta, Monika Viscogliosi, Federica Martemucci, Luigi Grzybowska-Chlebowczyk, Urszula Perrot, Valerie Kornowski, Anne Benninga, Marc A. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Original Article: Endoscopy and Procedures Many protocols and preparations are used for bowel cleansing before pediatric colonoscopy but few are based on scientific evidence. We evaluated efficacy, safety, tolerability, and patient preference of oral sulfate solution (OSS) at 75% of the adult dose versus polyethylene glycol (PEG)-electrolyte solution in adolescents presenting for diagnostic colonoscopy. METHODS: Phase III, randomized, evaluator-blinded, non-inferiority study of OSS and PEG in adolescents aged 12–17 years. OSS and PEG were administered in 2 doses on the day before colonoscopy. Primary endpoint included proportion of patients with successful overall preparation (4-point scale). Secondary endpoints included overall and segmental bowel cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale; BBPS), completed colonoscopies, duration of examination, time to cecal intubation, proportion of nasogastric tubes (NGTs), adverse events (AEs) and acceptability. RESULTS: Successful cleansing was achieved in 71.4% and 79.0% of patients receiving OSS and PEG, respectively [adjusted difference −7.61 (95% confidence interval, CI, −18.45 to 3.24); P = 0.0907]. Segmental BBPS score for the left and transverse colon were similar between treatment groups, but better for the right colon with PEG than OSS [2.2 (95% CI, 2.0–2.4) and 1.9 (95% CI, 1.7–2.1), respectively; P = 0.0015]. Significantly fewer OSS patients needed NGT placement to ingest the whole solution [9/125 (7.2%)] than PEG patients [36/116 (31.0%); P < 0.0001]. Treatment acceptability was significantly higher with OSS than PEG (P < 0.0001). Duration of examination, completed colonoscopies, and time to cecal intubation were similar between preparations. Gastrointestinal AEs including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and distension were similar in both groups but more patients receiving PEG had AEs assessed as incapacitating. CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority of OSS to PEG was not demonstrated, but OSS was associated with a lower requirement for NGT, better acceptability, and less frequent severe AEs than with PEG. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-22 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10097489/ /pubmed/36821851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000003745 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article: Endoscopy and Procedures
Socha, Piotr
Posovszky, Carsten
Szychta, Monika
Viscogliosi, Federica
Martemucci, Luigi
Grzybowska-Chlebowczyk, Urszula
Perrot, Valerie
Kornowski, Anne
Benninga, Marc A.
Phase III Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of OSS Versus PEG + Electrolyte Colonoscopy Preparation in Adolescents
title Phase III Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of OSS Versus PEG + Electrolyte Colonoscopy Preparation in Adolescents
title_full Phase III Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of OSS Versus PEG + Electrolyte Colonoscopy Preparation in Adolescents
title_fullStr Phase III Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of OSS Versus PEG + Electrolyte Colonoscopy Preparation in Adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Phase III Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of OSS Versus PEG + Electrolyte Colonoscopy Preparation in Adolescents
title_short Phase III Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of OSS Versus PEG + Electrolyte Colonoscopy Preparation in Adolescents
title_sort phase iii randomized non-inferiority study of oss versus peg + electrolyte colonoscopy preparation in adolescents
topic Original Article: Endoscopy and Procedures
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36821851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000003745
work_keys_str_mv AT sochapiotr phaseiiirandomizednoninferioritystudyofossversuspegelectrolytecolonoscopypreparationinadolescents
AT posovszkycarsten phaseiiirandomizednoninferioritystudyofossversuspegelectrolytecolonoscopypreparationinadolescents
AT szychtamonika phaseiiirandomizednoninferioritystudyofossversuspegelectrolytecolonoscopypreparationinadolescents
AT viscogliosifederica phaseiiirandomizednoninferioritystudyofossversuspegelectrolytecolonoscopypreparationinadolescents
AT martemucciluigi phaseiiirandomizednoninferioritystudyofossversuspegelectrolytecolonoscopypreparationinadolescents
AT grzybowskachlebowczykurszula phaseiiirandomizednoninferioritystudyofossversuspegelectrolytecolonoscopypreparationinadolescents
AT perrotvalerie phaseiiirandomizednoninferioritystudyofossversuspegelectrolytecolonoscopypreparationinadolescents
AT kornowskianne phaseiiirandomizednoninferioritystudyofossversuspegelectrolytecolonoscopypreparationinadolescents
AT benningamarca phaseiiirandomizednoninferioritystudyofossversuspegelectrolytecolonoscopypreparationinadolescents