Cargando…

Clinical thought-based software for diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip on pediatric pelvic radiographs

BACKGROUND: The common methods of radiographic diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) include measuring hip parameters and quantifying the degree of hip dislocation. However, clinical thought-based analysis of hip parameters may be a more effective way to achieve expert-like diagnoses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sha, Jia, Huang, Luyu, Chen, Yaopeng, Fan, Zongzhi, Lin, Jincong, Yang, Qinghai, Li, Yi, Yan, Yabo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37063681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1080194
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The common methods of radiographic diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) include measuring hip parameters and quantifying the degree of hip dislocation. However, clinical thought-based analysis of hip parameters may be a more effective way to achieve expert-like diagnoses of DDH. This study aims to develop a diagnostic strategy-based software for pediatric DDH and validate its clinical feasibility. METHODS: In total, 543 anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were retrospectively collected from January 2017 to December 2021. Two independent clinicians measured four diagnostic indices to compare the diagnoses made by the software and conventional manual method. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and confusion matrix, and the consistency of parametric measurements was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: In 543 cases (1,086 hips), the area under the curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the software for diagnosing DDH were 0.988–0.994, 99.08%–99.72%, 98.07%–100.00%, and 99.59%, respectively. Compared with the expert panel, the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement for the acetabular index, as determined by the software, were −2.09°–2.91° (junior orthopedist) and −1.98°–2.72° (intermediate orthopedist). As for the lateral center-edge angle, the 95% limits were −3.68°–5.28° (junior orthopedist) and −2.94°–4.59° (intermediate orthopedist). CONCLUSIONS: The software can provide expert-like analysis of pelvic radiographs and obtain the radiographic diagnosis of pediatric DDH with great consistency and efficiency. Its initial success lays the groundwork for developing a full-intelligent comprehensive diagnostic system of DDH.