Cargando…

Comparison of thoracoabdominal versus abdominal-transhiatal surgical approaches in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction: Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (Siewert II AEG) can be resected by the right thoracoabdominal surgical approach (RTA) or abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach (TH) under minimally invasive conditions. Although both surgical methods achieve complete tumor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yue, Chao, Mo, Zhenchang, Wu, Xiao, Wang, Yannian, Yang, Qinchuan, Wang, Weidong, Zhou, Haikun, Gao, Ruiqi, Ji, Panpan, Dong, Danhong, Zhang, Ying, Ji, Gang, Li, Xiaohua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1091615
_version_ 1785024746585325568
author Yue, Chao
Mo, Zhenchang
Wu, Xiao
Wang, Yannian
Yang, Qinchuan
Wang, Weidong
Zhou, Haikun
Gao, Ruiqi
Ji, Panpan
Dong, Danhong
Zhang, Ying
Ji, Gang
Li, Xiaohua
author_facet Yue, Chao
Mo, Zhenchang
Wu, Xiao
Wang, Yannian
Yang, Qinchuan
Wang, Weidong
Zhou, Haikun
Gao, Ruiqi
Ji, Panpan
Dong, Danhong
Zhang, Ying
Ji, Gang
Li, Xiaohua
author_sort Yue, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (Siewert II AEG) can be resected by the right thoracoabdominal surgical approach (RTA) or abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach (TH) under minimally invasive conditions. Although both surgical methods achieve complete tumor resection, there is a debate as to whether the former method is superior to or at least noninferior to the latter in terms of surgical safety. Currently, a small number of retrospective studies have compared the two surgical approaches, with inconclusive results. As such, a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial is necessary to validate the value of RTA (Ivor-Lewis) compared to TH. METHODS: The planned study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients (n=212) with Siewert II AEG that could be resected by either of the above two surgical approaches will be included in this trial and randomized to the RTA group (n=106) or the TH group (n=106). The primary outcome will be 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes will include 5-year overall survival (OS), incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, local recurrence rate, number and location of removed lymph nodes, quality of life (QOL), surgical Apgar score, and duration of the operation. Follow-ups are scheduled every three months for the first 3 years after the surgery and every six months for the next 2 years. DISCUSSION: Among Siewert II AEG patients with resectable tumors, this is the first prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the surgical safety of minimally invasive RTA and TH. RTA is hypothesized to provide better digestive tract reconstruction and dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes while maintaining a high quality of life and good postoperative outcome. Moreover, this trial will provide a high level of evidence for the choice of surgical procedures for Siewert II AEG. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials, identifier (ChiECRCT20210635); Clinical Trial.gov, identifier (NCT05356520).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100981782023-04-14 Comparison of thoracoabdominal versus abdominal-transhiatal surgical approaches in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction: Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial Yue, Chao Mo, Zhenchang Wu, Xiao Wang, Yannian Yang, Qinchuan Wang, Weidong Zhou, Haikun Gao, Ruiqi Ji, Panpan Dong, Danhong Zhang, Ying Ji, Gang Li, Xiaohua Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (Siewert II AEG) can be resected by the right thoracoabdominal surgical approach (RTA) or abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach (TH) under minimally invasive conditions. Although both surgical methods achieve complete tumor resection, there is a debate as to whether the former method is superior to or at least noninferior to the latter in terms of surgical safety. Currently, a small number of retrospective studies have compared the two surgical approaches, with inconclusive results. As such, a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial is necessary to validate the value of RTA (Ivor-Lewis) compared to TH. METHODS: The planned study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients (n=212) with Siewert II AEG that could be resected by either of the above two surgical approaches will be included in this trial and randomized to the RTA group (n=106) or the TH group (n=106). The primary outcome will be 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes will include 5-year overall survival (OS), incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, local recurrence rate, number and location of removed lymph nodes, quality of life (QOL), surgical Apgar score, and duration of the operation. Follow-ups are scheduled every three months for the first 3 years after the surgery and every six months for the next 2 years. DISCUSSION: Among Siewert II AEG patients with resectable tumors, this is the first prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the surgical safety of minimally invasive RTA and TH. RTA is hypothesized to provide better digestive tract reconstruction and dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes while maintaining a high quality of life and good postoperative outcome. Moreover, this trial will provide a high level of evidence for the choice of surgical procedures for Siewert II AEG. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials, identifier (ChiECRCT20210635); Clinical Trial.gov, identifier (NCT05356520). Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10098178/ /pubmed/37064105 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1091615 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yue, Mo, Wu, Wang, Yang, Wang, Zhou, Gao, Ji, Dong, Zhang, Ji and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Yue, Chao
Mo, Zhenchang
Wu, Xiao
Wang, Yannian
Yang, Qinchuan
Wang, Weidong
Zhou, Haikun
Gao, Ruiqi
Ji, Panpan
Dong, Danhong
Zhang, Ying
Ji, Gang
Li, Xiaohua
Comparison of thoracoabdominal versus abdominal-transhiatal surgical approaches in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction: Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of thoracoabdominal versus abdominal-transhiatal surgical approaches in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction: Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of thoracoabdominal versus abdominal-transhiatal surgical approaches in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction: Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of thoracoabdominal versus abdominal-transhiatal surgical approaches in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction: Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of thoracoabdominal versus abdominal-transhiatal surgical approaches in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction: Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of thoracoabdominal versus abdominal-transhiatal surgical approaches in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction: Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of thoracoabdominal versus abdominal-transhiatal surgical approaches in siewert type ii adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction: protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1091615
work_keys_str_mv AT yuechao comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mozhenchang comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuxiao comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangyannian comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yangqinchuan comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangweidong comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhouhaikun comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gaoruiqi comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jipanpan comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dongdanhong comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangying comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jigang comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lixiaohua comparisonofthoracoabdominalversusabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachesinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaattheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial