Cargando…

The impact of persistent precarity on patients’ capacity to manage their treatment burden: A comparative qualitative study between urban and rural patients with multimorbidity in South Africa

BACKGROUND: People living with multimorbidity in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience a high workload trying to meet the demands of self-management. In an unequal society like South Africa, many people face continuous economic uncertainty, which can impact on their capacity to manage t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Pinxteren, Myrna, Mbokazi, Nonzuzo, Murphy, Katherine, Mair, Frances S., May, Carl, Levitt, Naomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1061190
_version_ 1785024750386413568
author van Pinxteren, Myrna
Mbokazi, Nonzuzo
Murphy, Katherine
Mair, Frances S.
May, Carl
Levitt, Naomi
author_facet van Pinxteren, Myrna
Mbokazi, Nonzuzo
Murphy, Katherine
Mair, Frances S.
May, Carl
Levitt, Naomi
author_sort van Pinxteren, Myrna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People living with multimorbidity in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience a high workload trying to meet the demands of self-management. In an unequal society like South Africa, many people face continuous economic uncertainty, which can impact on their capacity to manage their illnesses and lead to poor health outcomes. Using precariousness – the real and perceived impact of uncertainty – as a lens, this paper aims to identify, characterise, and understand the workload and capacity associated with self-management amongst people with multimorbidity living in precarious circumstances in urban and rural South Africa. METHODS: We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 30 patients with HIV and co-morbidities between February and April 2021. Patients were attending public clinics in Cape Town (Western Cape) and Bulungula (Eastern Cape). Interviews were transcribed and data analysed using qualitative framework analysis. Burden of Treatment Theory (BoTT) and the Cumulative Complexity Model (CuCoM) were used as theoretical lenses through which to conceptualise the data. RESULTS: People with multimorbidity in rural and urban South Africa experienced multi-faceted precariousness, including financial and housing insecurity, dangerous living circumstances and exposure to violence. Women felt unsafe in their communities and sometimes their homes, whilst men struggled with substance use and a lack of social support. Older patients relied on small income grants often shared with others, whilst younger patients struggled to find stable employment and combine self-management with family responsibilities. Precariousness impacted access to health services and information and peoples’ ability to buy healthy foods and out-of-pocket medication, thus increasing their treatment burden and reducing their capacity. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that precariousness reduces the capacity and increases treatment burden for patients with multimorbidity in low-income settings in South Africa. Precariousness is both accumulative and cyclic, as financial insecurity impacts every aspect of peoples’ daily lives. Findings emphasise that current models examining treatment burden need to be adapted to accommodate patients’ experiences in low-income settings and address cumulative precariousness. Understanding treatment burden and capacity for patients in LMICs is a crucial first step to redesign health systems which aim to improve self-management and offer comprehensive person-centred care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100981912023-04-14 The impact of persistent precarity on patients’ capacity to manage their treatment burden: A comparative qualitative study between urban and rural patients with multimorbidity in South Africa van Pinxteren, Myrna Mbokazi, Nonzuzo Murphy, Katherine Mair, Frances S. May, Carl Levitt, Naomi Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: People living with multimorbidity in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience a high workload trying to meet the demands of self-management. In an unequal society like South Africa, many people face continuous economic uncertainty, which can impact on their capacity to manage their illnesses and lead to poor health outcomes. Using precariousness – the real and perceived impact of uncertainty – as a lens, this paper aims to identify, characterise, and understand the workload and capacity associated with self-management amongst people with multimorbidity living in precarious circumstances in urban and rural South Africa. METHODS: We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 30 patients with HIV and co-morbidities between February and April 2021. Patients were attending public clinics in Cape Town (Western Cape) and Bulungula (Eastern Cape). Interviews were transcribed and data analysed using qualitative framework analysis. Burden of Treatment Theory (BoTT) and the Cumulative Complexity Model (CuCoM) were used as theoretical lenses through which to conceptualise the data. RESULTS: People with multimorbidity in rural and urban South Africa experienced multi-faceted precariousness, including financial and housing insecurity, dangerous living circumstances and exposure to violence. Women felt unsafe in their communities and sometimes their homes, whilst men struggled with substance use and a lack of social support. Older patients relied on small income grants often shared with others, whilst younger patients struggled to find stable employment and combine self-management with family responsibilities. Precariousness impacted access to health services and information and peoples’ ability to buy healthy foods and out-of-pocket medication, thus increasing their treatment burden and reducing their capacity. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that precariousness reduces the capacity and increases treatment burden for patients with multimorbidity in low-income settings in South Africa. Precariousness is both accumulative and cyclic, as financial insecurity impacts every aspect of peoples’ daily lives. Findings emphasise that current models examining treatment burden need to be adapted to accommodate patients’ experiences in low-income settings and address cumulative precariousness. Understanding treatment burden and capacity for patients in LMICs is a crucial first step to redesign health systems which aim to improve self-management and offer comprehensive person-centred care. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10098191/ /pubmed/37064034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1061190 Text en Copyright © 2023 van Pinxteren, Mbokazi, Murphy, Mair, May and Levitt. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
van Pinxteren, Myrna
Mbokazi, Nonzuzo
Murphy, Katherine
Mair, Frances S.
May, Carl
Levitt, Naomi
The impact of persistent precarity on patients’ capacity to manage their treatment burden: A comparative qualitative study between urban and rural patients with multimorbidity in South Africa
title The impact of persistent precarity on patients’ capacity to manage their treatment burden: A comparative qualitative study between urban and rural patients with multimorbidity in South Africa
title_full The impact of persistent precarity on patients’ capacity to manage their treatment burden: A comparative qualitative study between urban and rural patients with multimorbidity in South Africa
title_fullStr The impact of persistent precarity on patients’ capacity to manage their treatment burden: A comparative qualitative study between urban and rural patients with multimorbidity in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed The impact of persistent precarity on patients’ capacity to manage their treatment burden: A comparative qualitative study between urban and rural patients with multimorbidity in South Africa
title_short The impact of persistent precarity on patients’ capacity to manage their treatment burden: A comparative qualitative study between urban and rural patients with multimorbidity in South Africa
title_sort impact of persistent precarity on patients’ capacity to manage their treatment burden: a comparative qualitative study between urban and rural patients with multimorbidity in south africa
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1061190
work_keys_str_mv AT vanpinxterenmyrna theimpactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT mbokazinonzuzo theimpactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT murphykatherine theimpactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT mairfrancess theimpactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT maycarl theimpactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT levittnaomi theimpactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT vanpinxterenmyrna impactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT mbokazinonzuzo impactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT murphykatherine impactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT mairfrancess impactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT maycarl impactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica
AT levittnaomi impactofpersistentprecarityonpatientscapacitytomanagetheirtreatmentburdenacomparativequalitativestudybetweenurbanandruralpatientswithmultimorbidityinsouthafrica