Cargando…

Evaluating novel approaches for estimating awake and sleep blood pressure: design of the Better BP Study – a randomised, crossover trial

INTRODUCTION: For many people, blood pressure (BP) levels differ when measured in a medical office versus outside of the office setting. Out-of-office BP has a stronger association with cardiovascular disease (CVD) events compared with BP measured in the office. Many BP guidelines recommend measurin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cepeda, Maria, Hubbard, Demetria, Oparil, Suzanne, Schwartz, Joseph E, Jaeger, Byron C, Hardy, Shakia T, Medina, Julia, Chen, Ligong, Muntner, Paul, Shimbo, Daichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35667722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058140
_version_ 1785024766283874304
author Cepeda, Maria
Hubbard, Demetria
Oparil, Suzanne
Schwartz, Joseph E
Jaeger, Byron C
Hardy, Shakia T
Medina, Julia
Chen, Ligong
Muntner, Paul
Shimbo, Daichi
author_facet Cepeda, Maria
Hubbard, Demetria
Oparil, Suzanne
Schwartz, Joseph E
Jaeger, Byron C
Hardy, Shakia T
Medina, Julia
Chen, Ligong
Muntner, Paul
Shimbo, Daichi
author_sort Cepeda, Maria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: For many people, blood pressure (BP) levels differ when measured in a medical office versus outside of the office setting. Out-of-office BP has a stronger association with cardiovascular disease (CVD) events compared with BP measured in the office. Many BP guidelines recommend measuring BP outside of the office to confirm the levels obtained in the office. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) can assess out-of-office BP but is not available in many US practices and some individuals find it uncomfortable. The aims of the Better BP Study are to (1) test if unattended office BP is closer to awake BP on ABPM compared with attended office BP, (2) assess if sleep BP assessed by home BP monitoring (HBPM) agrees with sleep BP from a full night of ABPM and (3) compare the strengths of associations of unattended versus attended office BP, unattended office BP versus awake BP on ABPM and sleep BP on HBPM versus ABPM with markers of end-organ damage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are recruiting 630 adults not taking antihypertensive medication in Birmingham, Alabama, and New York, New York. Participants are having their office BP measured with (attended) and without (unattended) a technician present, in random order, using an automated oscillometric office BP device during each of two visits within one week. Following these visits, participants complete 24 hours of ABPM and one night of HBPM, in random order. Psychosocial factors, anthropometrics, left ventricular mass index and albumin-to-creatinine ratio are also being assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the Columbia University Medical Center Institutional Review Boards. The study results will be disseminated at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04307004.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100982582023-04-14 Evaluating novel approaches for estimating awake and sleep blood pressure: design of the Better BP Study – a randomised, crossover trial Cepeda, Maria Hubbard, Demetria Oparil, Suzanne Schwartz, Joseph E Jaeger, Byron C Hardy, Shakia T Medina, Julia Chen, Ligong Muntner, Paul Shimbo, Daichi BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice INTRODUCTION: For many people, blood pressure (BP) levels differ when measured in a medical office versus outside of the office setting. Out-of-office BP has a stronger association with cardiovascular disease (CVD) events compared with BP measured in the office. Many BP guidelines recommend measuring BP outside of the office to confirm the levels obtained in the office. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) can assess out-of-office BP but is not available in many US practices and some individuals find it uncomfortable. The aims of the Better BP Study are to (1) test if unattended office BP is closer to awake BP on ABPM compared with attended office BP, (2) assess if sleep BP assessed by home BP monitoring (HBPM) agrees with sleep BP from a full night of ABPM and (3) compare the strengths of associations of unattended versus attended office BP, unattended office BP versus awake BP on ABPM and sleep BP on HBPM versus ABPM with markers of end-organ damage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are recruiting 630 adults not taking antihypertensive medication in Birmingham, Alabama, and New York, New York. Participants are having their office BP measured with (attended) and without (unattended) a technician present, in random order, using an automated oscillometric office BP device during each of two visits within one week. Following these visits, participants complete 24 hours of ABPM and one night of HBPM, in random order. Psychosocial factors, anthropometrics, left ventricular mass index and albumin-to-creatinine ratio are also being assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the Columbia University Medical Center Institutional Review Boards. The study results will be disseminated at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04307004. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10098258/ /pubmed/35667722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058140 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Cepeda, Maria
Hubbard, Demetria
Oparil, Suzanne
Schwartz, Joseph E
Jaeger, Byron C
Hardy, Shakia T
Medina, Julia
Chen, Ligong
Muntner, Paul
Shimbo, Daichi
Evaluating novel approaches for estimating awake and sleep blood pressure: design of the Better BP Study – a randomised, crossover trial
title Evaluating novel approaches for estimating awake and sleep blood pressure: design of the Better BP Study – a randomised, crossover trial
title_full Evaluating novel approaches for estimating awake and sleep blood pressure: design of the Better BP Study – a randomised, crossover trial
title_fullStr Evaluating novel approaches for estimating awake and sleep blood pressure: design of the Better BP Study – a randomised, crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating novel approaches for estimating awake and sleep blood pressure: design of the Better BP Study – a randomised, crossover trial
title_short Evaluating novel approaches for estimating awake and sleep blood pressure: design of the Better BP Study – a randomised, crossover trial
title_sort evaluating novel approaches for estimating awake and sleep blood pressure: design of the better bp study – a randomised, crossover trial
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35667722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058140
work_keys_str_mv AT cepedamaria evaluatingnovelapproachesforestimatingawakeandsleepbloodpressuredesignofthebetterbpstudyarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT hubbarddemetria evaluatingnovelapproachesforestimatingawakeandsleepbloodpressuredesignofthebetterbpstudyarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT oparilsuzanne evaluatingnovelapproachesforestimatingawakeandsleepbloodpressuredesignofthebetterbpstudyarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT schwartzjosephe evaluatingnovelapproachesforestimatingawakeandsleepbloodpressuredesignofthebetterbpstudyarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT jaegerbyronc evaluatingnovelapproachesforestimatingawakeandsleepbloodpressuredesignofthebetterbpstudyarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT hardyshakiat evaluatingnovelapproachesforestimatingawakeandsleepbloodpressuredesignofthebetterbpstudyarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT medinajulia evaluatingnovelapproachesforestimatingawakeandsleepbloodpressuredesignofthebetterbpstudyarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT chenligong evaluatingnovelapproachesforestimatingawakeandsleepbloodpressuredesignofthebetterbpstudyarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT muntnerpaul evaluatingnovelapproachesforestimatingawakeandsleepbloodpressuredesignofthebetterbpstudyarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT shimbodaichi evaluatingnovelapproachesforestimatingawakeandsleepbloodpressuredesignofthebetterbpstudyarandomisedcrossovertrial