Cargando…
Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary
BACKGROUND: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where a primary tissue of origin (TOO) is uncertain. Most patients with CUP have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be efficacious in some patients wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005809 |
_version_ | 1785024768744882176 |
---|---|
author | Posner, Atara Sivakumaran, Tharani Pattison, Andrew Etemadmoghadam, Dariush Thio, Niko Wood, Colin Fisher, Krista Webb, Samantha DeFazio, Anna Wilcken, Nicholas Gao, Bo Karapetis, Christos S Singh, Madhu Collins, Ian M Richardson, Gary Steer, Christopher Warren, Mark Karanth, Narayan Fellowes, Andrew Fox, Stephen B Hicks, Rodney J Schofield, Penelope Bowtell, David Prall, Owen W J Tothill, Richard William Mileshkin, Linda |
author_facet | Posner, Atara Sivakumaran, Tharani Pattison, Andrew Etemadmoghadam, Dariush Thio, Niko Wood, Colin Fisher, Krista Webb, Samantha DeFazio, Anna Wilcken, Nicholas Gao, Bo Karapetis, Christos S Singh, Madhu Collins, Ian M Richardson, Gary Steer, Christopher Warren, Mark Karanth, Narayan Fellowes, Andrew Fox, Stephen B Hicks, Rodney J Schofield, Penelope Bowtell, David Prall, Owen W J Tothill, Richard William Mileshkin, Linda |
author_sort | Posner, Atara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where a primary tissue of origin (TOO) is uncertain. Most patients with CUP have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be efficacious in some patients with CUP, but the optimal predictive biomarkers are unknown. We therefore assessed immune and genomic biomarkers as well as predicted TOO in patients with CUP, including a subset treated with ICIs. METHODS: Patients with CUP were subject to gene-expression profiling (GEP) and DNA panel sequencing. Immune and stromal-related gene expression was explored by NanoString, including genes associated with immunotherapy response (IR) in other solid malignancies. ICI responsive cancer types were assigned based on Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, and either detection of a latent primary tumor or the TOO was suspected based on genomics informed pathology review. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and gene mutations were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients with CUP were included, 215 assessed for TOO in a previous study, with the majority (163) receiving both RNA and DNA tests. Of GEP profiled cases, 33% (59/175) had a high IR gene-expression score. Of the DNA sequenced cases, 16% (32/203) had high TMB (>10 mutations/Mb), including two with mismatch repair deficiency. Low correlation was observed between TMB and an IR score (R=0.26, p<0.001). Among 110 CUPs with a latent primary or suspected TOO, 47% (52/110) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. More than half of the CUPs had at least one feature that may predict ICI response (high IR score, high TMB, ICI-responsive cancer type). Among patients with CUP treated with ICIs, 8/28 (29%) responded (2 complete responses and 6 partial responses). Among non-responders, 9 had stable and 11 had progressive disease. All responders had a high IR score (7/8) and/or high TMB (3/8), while most (5/8) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. These features were detected at a lower frequency in non-responders and mostly in patients with stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: A significant fraction of CUP tumors had genomic features previously associated with ICI response. High IR score was the most sensitive predictive feature of ICI response, warranting evaluation in a larger patient series. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10098268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100982682023-04-14 Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary Posner, Atara Sivakumaran, Tharani Pattison, Andrew Etemadmoghadam, Dariush Thio, Niko Wood, Colin Fisher, Krista Webb, Samantha DeFazio, Anna Wilcken, Nicholas Gao, Bo Karapetis, Christos S Singh, Madhu Collins, Ian M Richardson, Gary Steer, Christopher Warren, Mark Karanth, Narayan Fellowes, Andrew Fox, Stephen B Hicks, Rodney J Schofield, Penelope Bowtell, David Prall, Owen W J Tothill, Richard William Mileshkin, Linda J Immunother Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarkers BACKGROUND: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where a primary tissue of origin (TOO) is uncertain. Most patients with CUP have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be efficacious in some patients with CUP, but the optimal predictive biomarkers are unknown. We therefore assessed immune and genomic biomarkers as well as predicted TOO in patients with CUP, including a subset treated with ICIs. METHODS: Patients with CUP were subject to gene-expression profiling (GEP) and DNA panel sequencing. Immune and stromal-related gene expression was explored by NanoString, including genes associated with immunotherapy response (IR) in other solid malignancies. ICI responsive cancer types were assigned based on Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, and either detection of a latent primary tumor or the TOO was suspected based on genomics informed pathology review. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and gene mutations were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients with CUP were included, 215 assessed for TOO in a previous study, with the majority (163) receiving both RNA and DNA tests. Of GEP profiled cases, 33% (59/175) had a high IR gene-expression score. Of the DNA sequenced cases, 16% (32/203) had high TMB (>10 mutations/Mb), including two with mismatch repair deficiency. Low correlation was observed between TMB and an IR score (R=0.26, p<0.001). Among 110 CUPs with a latent primary or suspected TOO, 47% (52/110) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. More than half of the CUPs had at least one feature that may predict ICI response (high IR score, high TMB, ICI-responsive cancer type). Among patients with CUP treated with ICIs, 8/28 (29%) responded (2 complete responses and 6 partial responses). Among non-responders, 9 had stable and 11 had progressive disease. All responders had a high IR score (7/8) and/or high TMB (3/8), while most (5/8) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. These features were detected at a lower frequency in non-responders and mostly in patients with stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: A significant fraction of CUP tumors had genomic features previously associated with ICI response. High IR score was the most sensitive predictive feature of ICI response, warranting evaluation in a larger patient series. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10098268/ /pubmed/36720497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005809 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Immunotherapy Biomarkers Posner, Atara Sivakumaran, Tharani Pattison, Andrew Etemadmoghadam, Dariush Thio, Niko Wood, Colin Fisher, Krista Webb, Samantha DeFazio, Anna Wilcken, Nicholas Gao, Bo Karapetis, Christos S Singh, Madhu Collins, Ian M Richardson, Gary Steer, Christopher Warren, Mark Karanth, Narayan Fellowes, Andrew Fox, Stephen B Hicks, Rodney J Schofield, Penelope Bowtell, David Prall, Owen W J Tothill, Richard William Mileshkin, Linda Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary |
title | Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary |
title_full | Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary |
title_fullStr | Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary |
title_full_unstemmed | Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary |
title_short | Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary |
title_sort | immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary |
topic | Immunotherapy Biomarkers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005809 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT posneratara immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT sivakumarantharani immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT pattisonandrew immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT etemadmoghadamdariush immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT thioniko immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT woodcolin immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT fisherkrista immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT webbsamantha immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT defazioanna immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT wilckennicholas immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT gaobo immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT karapetischristoss immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT singhmadhu immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT collinsianm immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT richardsongary immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT steerchristopher immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT warrenmark immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT karanthnarayan immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT fellowesandrew immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT foxstephenb immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT hicksrodneyj immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT schofieldpenelope immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT bowtelldavid immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT prallowenwj immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT tothillrichardwilliam immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary AT mileshkinlinda immuneandgenomicbiomarkersofimmunotherapyresponseincancerofunknownprimary |