Cargando…

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restored with Different Post Systems

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the (i) presence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) and (ii) type of post system have no effect on the fracture resistance and pattern in endodontically treated maxillary premolars. METHODS: Human maxillary first premolars (n=60) with two root canals were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leung, Wing See Fiona, Lee, Angeline Hui Cheng, Liu, Christopher, Hu, Mingxin, Chang, Jeffrey Wen Wei, Neelakantan, Prasanna, Zhang, Chengfei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748446
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2022.96720
_version_ 1785024816677388288
author Leung, Wing See Fiona
Lee, Angeline Hui Cheng
Liu, Christopher
Hu, Mingxin
Chang, Jeffrey Wen Wei
Neelakantan, Prasanna
Zhang, Chengfei
author_facet Leung, Wing See Fiona
Lee, Angeline Hui Cheng
Liu, Christopher
Hu, Mingxin
Chang, Jeffrey Wen Wei
Neelakantan, Prasanna
Zhang, Chengfei
author_sort Leung, Wing See Fiona
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the (i) presence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) and (ii) type of post system have no effect on the fracture resistance and pattern in endodontically treated maxillary premolars. METHODS: Human maxillary first premolars (n=60) with two root canals were randomly allocated into four groups (n=15). Buccal wedge-shaped NCCLs were prepared in 45 teeth specimens. Following root canal treatment, the specimens were randomly divided into (i) composite resin core (CRC); (ii) NCCLs + composite resin core (NCCL+CRC); (iii) NCCLs+prefabricated fibre-reinforced composite post + composite resin core (NCCL+PFRC+CRC); (iv) NCCLs+custom fibre posts + composite resin core (NCCL+CFP+CRC). All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (5°C to 55°C/5000 cycles). The compressive load was applied non-axially to the palatal cusp with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min at a 30° angle until fracture. Fracture patterns were examined using a loupe magnification (2.5×) under transillumination. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric tests and pairwise comparisons of the load-to-fracture among the groups. Chi-square test was used to analyse the fracture patterns (P=0.05). RESULTS: Fracture resistance of NCCL+PFRC+CRC was significantly higher than NCCL+CRC (P=0.011), while NCCL+CFP+CRC did not show any significant difference when compared to NCCL+CRC (P=0.089). No statistical difference was found between CRC, NCCL+PFRC+CRC and NCCL+CFP+CRC (P=1.000). The frequencies of favourable fracture patterns in descending orders were as follows: CRC (80%), NCCL+CFP+CRC (73%), NCCL+PFRC+CRC (60%), and NCCL+CRC (40%). Chi-square test did not show significant differences in fracture patterns among all groups (P=0.110). CONCLUSION: Restoration of the endodontically treated maxillary premolars with NCCLs, with or without post, resulted in similar fracture resistance as their counterparts without NCCLs. Placement of a prefabricated fibre-reinforced composite post exhibited greater fracture resistance to the maxillary premolars with restored NCCLs than those without a post.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100984662023-04-14 Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restored with Different Post Systems Leung, Wing See Fiona Lee, Angeline Hui Cheng Liu, Christopher Hu, Mingxin Chang, Jeffrey Wen Wei Neelakantan, Prasanna Zhang, Chengfei Eur Endod J Original Article OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the (i) presence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) and (ii) type of post system have no effect on the fracture resistance and pattern in endodontically treated maxillary premolars. METHODS: Human maxillary first premolars (n=60) with two root canals were randomly allocated into four groups (n=15). Buccal wedge-shaped NCCLs were prepared in 45 teeth specimens. Following root canal treatment, the specimens were randomly divided into (i) composite resin core (CRC); (ii) NCCLs + composite resin core (NCCL+CRC); (iii) NCCLs+prefabricated fibre-reinforced composite post + composite resin core (NCCL+PFRC+CRC); (iv) NCCLs+custom fibre posts + composite resin core (NCCL+CFP+CRC). All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (5°C to 55°C/5000 cycles). The compressive load was applied non-axially to the palatal cusp with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min at a 30° angle until fracture. Fracture patterns were examined using a loupe magnification (2.5×) under transillumination. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric tests and pairwise comparisons of the load-to-fracture among the groups. Chi-square test was used to analyse the fracture patterns (P=0.05). RESULTS: Fracture resistance of NCCL+PFRC+CRC was significantly higher than NCCL+CRC (P=0.011), while NCCL+CFP+CRC did not show any significant difference when compared to NCCL+CRC (P=0.089). No statistical difference was found between CRC, NCCL+PFRC+CRC and NCCL+CFP+CRC (P=1.000). The frequencies of favourable fracture patterns in descending orders were as follows: CRC (80%), NCCL+CFP+CRC (73%), NCCL+PFRC+CRC (60%), and NCCL+CRC (40%). Chi-square test did not show significant differences in fracture patterns among all groups (P=0.110). CONCLUSION: Restoration of the endodontically treated maxillary premolars with NCCLs, with or without post, resulted in similar fracture resistance as their counterparts without NCCLs. Placement of a prefabricated fibre-reinforced composite post exhibited greater fracture resistance to the maxillary premolars with restored NCCLs than those without a post. Kare Publishing 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10098466/ /pubmed/36748446 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2022.96720 Text en © Copyright 2023 by European Endodontic Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Leung, Wing See Fiona
Lee, Angeline Hui Cheng
Liu, Christopher
Hu, Mingxin
Chang, Jeffrey Wen Wei
Neelakantan, Prasanna
Zhang, Chengfei
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restored with Different Post Systems
title Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restored with Different Post Systems
title_full Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restored with Different Post Systems
title_fullStr Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restored with Different Post Systems
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restored with Different Post Systems
title_short Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restored with Different Post Systems
title_sort fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars with non-carious cervical lesions restored with different post systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748446
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2022.96720
work_keys_str_mv AT leungwingseefiona fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarswithnoncariouscervicallesionsrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems
AT leeangelinehuicheng fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarswithnoncariouscervicallesionsrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems
AT liuchristopher fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarswithnoncariouscervicallesionsrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems
AT humingxin fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarswithnoncariouscervicallesionsrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems
AT changjeffreywenwei fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarswithnoncariouscervicallesionsrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems
AT neelakantanprasanna fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarswithnoncariouscervicallesionsrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems
AT zhangchengfei fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarswithnoncariouscervicallesionsrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems