Cargando…
Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies?
Ectomycorrhizal exploration types are commonly assumed to denote spatial foraging patterns and resource‐related niches of extraradical mycelia. However, empirical evidence of the consistency of foraging strategies within exploration types is lacking. Here, we analysed ectomycorrhizal foraging patter...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36271619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18566 |
_version_ | 1785024828470722560 |
---|---|
author | Jörgensen, Karolina Clemmensen, Karina E. Wallander, Håkan Lindahl, Björn D. |
author_facet | Jörgensen, Karolina Clemmensen, Karina E. Wallander, Håkan Lindahl, Björn D. |
author_sort | Jörgensen, Karolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ectomycorrhizal exploration types are commonly assumed to denote spatial foraging patterns and resource‐related niches of extraradical mycelia. However, empirical evidence of the consistency of foraging strategies within exploration types is lacking. Here, we analysed ectomycorrhizal foraging patterns by incubating root‐excluding ingrowth mesh bags filled with six different substrates in mature Picea abies forests. High‐throughput sequencing was used to characterise ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in the mesh bags and on adjacent fine roots after one growing season. Contrary to expectations, many ectomycorrhizal genera of exploration types that are thought to produce little extraradical mycelium colonised ingrowth bags extensively, whereas genera commonly associated with ample mycelial production occurred sparsely in ingrowth bags relative to their abundance on roots. Previous assumptions about soil foraging patterns of exploration types do not seem to hold. Instead, we propose that variation in the proliferation of extraradical mycelium is related to intergeneric differences in mycelial longevity and the mobility of targeted resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10098516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100985162023-04-14 Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies? Jörgensen, Karolina Clemmensen, Karina E. Wallander, Håkan Lindahl, Björn D. New Phytol Research Ectomycorrhizal exploration types are commonly assumed to denote spatial foraging patterns and resource‐related niches of extraradical mycelia. However, empirical evidence of the consistency of foraging strategies within exploration types is lacking. Here, we analysed ectomycorrhizal foraging patterns by incubating root‐excluding ingrowth mesh bags filled with six different substrates in mature Picea abies forests. High‐throughput sequencing was used to characterise ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in the mesh bags and on adjacent fine roots after one growing season. Contrary to expectations, many ectomycorrhizal genera of exploration types that are thought to produce little extraradical mycelium colonised ingrowth bags extensively, whereas genera commonly associated with ample mycelial production occurred sparsely in ingrowth bags relative to their abundance on roots. Previous assumptions about soil foraging patterns of exploration types do not seem to hold. Instead, we propose that variation in the proliferation of extraradical mycelium is related to intergeneric differences in mycelial longevity and the mobility of targeted resources. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-23 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10098516/ /pubmed/36271619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18566 Text en © 2022 The Authors New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Jörgensen, Karolina Clemmensen, Karina E. Wallander, Håkan Lindahl, Björn D. Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies? |
title | Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies? |
title_full | Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies? |
title_fullStr | Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies? |
title_short | Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies? |
title_sort | do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36271619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18566 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jorgensenkarolina doectomycorrhizalexplorationtypesreflectmycelialforagingstrategies AT clemmensenkarinae doectomycorrhizalexplorationtypesreflectmycelialforagingstrategies AT wallanderhakan doectomycorrhizalexplorationtypesreflectmycelialforagingstrategies AT lindahlbjornd doectomycorrhizalexplorationtypesreflectmycelialforagingstrategies |