Cargando…

Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies?

Ectomycorrhizal exploration types are commonly assumed to denote spatial foraging patterns and resource‐related niches of extraradical mycelia. However, empirical evidence of the consistency of foraging strategies within exploration types is lacking. Here, we analysed ectomycorrhizal foraging patter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jörgensen, Karolina, Clemmensen, Karina E., Wallander, Håkan, Lindahl, Björn D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36271619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18566
_version_ 1785024828470722560
author Jörgensen, Karolina
Clemmensen, Karina E.
Wallander, Håkan
Lindahl, Björn D.
author_facet Jörgensen, Karolina
Clemmensen, Karina E.
Wallander, Håkan
Lindahl, Björn D.
author_sort Jörgensen, Karolina
collection PubMed
description Ectomycorrhizal exploration types are commonly assumed to denote spatial foraging patterns and resource‐related niches of extraradical mycelia. However, empirical evidence of the consistency of foraging strategies within exploration types is lacking. Here, we analysed ectomycorrhizal foraging patterns by incubating root‐excluding ingrowth mesh bags filled with six different substrates in mature Picea abies forests. High‐throughput sequencing was used to characterise ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in the mesh bags and on adjacent fine roots after one growing season. Contrary to expectations, many ectomycorrhizal genera of exploration types that are thought to produce little extraradical mycelium colonised ingrowth bags extensively, whereas genera commonly associated with ample mycelial production occurred sparsely in ingrowth bags relative to their abundance on roots. Previous assumptions about soil foraging patterns of exploration types do not seem to hold. Instead, we propose that variation in the proliferation of extraradical mycelium is related to intergeneric differences in mycelial longevity and the mobility of targeted resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100985162023-04-14 Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies? Jörgensen, Karolina Clemmensen, Karina E. Wallander, Håkan Lindahl, Björn D. New Phytol Research Ectomycorrhizal exploration types are commonly assumed to denote spatial foraging patterns and resource‐related niches of extraradical mycelia. However, empirical evidence of the consistency of foraging strategies within exploration types is lacking. Here, we analysed ectomycorrhizal foraging patterns by incubating root‐excluding ingrowth mesh bags filled with six different substrates in mature Picea abies forests. High‐throughput sequencing was used to characterise ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in the mesh bags and on adjacent fine roots after one growing season. Contrary to expectations, many ectomycorrhizal genera of exploration types that are thought to produce little extraradical mycelium colonised ingrowth bags extensively, whereas genera commonly associated with ample mycelial production occurred sparsely in ingrowth bags relative to their abundance on roots. Previous assumptions about soil foraging patterns of exploration types do not seem to hold. Instead, we propose that variation in the proliferation of extraradical mycelium is related to intergeneric differences in mycelial longevity and the mobility of targeted resources. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-23 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10098516/ /pubmed/36271619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18566 Text en © 2022 The Authors New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jörgensen, Karolina
Clemmensen, Karina E.
Wallander, Håkan
Lindahl, Björn D.
Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies?
title Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies?
title_full Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies?
title_fullStr Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies?
title_full_unstemmed Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies?
title_short Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies?
title_sort do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36271619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18566
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgensenkarolina doectomycorrhizalexplorationtypesreflectmycelialforagingstrategies
AT clemmensenkarinae doectomycorrhizalexplorationtypesreflectmycelialforagingstrategies
AT wallanderhakan doectomycorrhizalexplorationtypesreflectmycelialforagingstrategies
AT lindahlbjornd doectomycorrhizalexplorationtypesreflectmycelialforagingstrategies