Cargando…
High-Level CNN and Machine Learning Methods for Speaker Recognition
Speaker Recognition (SR) is a common task in AI-based sound analysis, involving structurally different methodologies such as Deep Learning or “traditional” Machine Learning (ML). In this paper, we compared and explored the two methodologies on the DEMoS dataset consisting of 8869 audio files of 58 s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073461 |
_version_ | 1785024885740797952 |
---|---|
author | Costantini, Giovanni Cesarini, Valerio Brenna, Emanuele |
author_facet | Costantini, Giovanni Cesarini, Valerio Brenna, Emanuele |
author_sort | Costantini, Giovanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | Speaker Recognition (SR) is a common task in AI-based sound analysis, involving structurally different methodologies such as Deep Learning or “traditional” Machine Learning (ML). In this paper, we compared and explored the two methodologies on the DEMoS dataset consisting of 8869 audio files of 58 speakers in different emotional states. A custom CNN is compared to several pre-trained nets using image inputs of spectrograms and Cepstral-temporal (MFCC) graphs. AML approach based on acoustic feature extraction, selection and multi-class classification by means of a Naïve Bayes model is also considered. Results show how a custom, less deep CNN trained on grayscale spectrogram images obtain the most accurate results, 90.15% on grayscale spectrograms and 83.17% on colored MFCC. AlexNet provides comparable results, reaching 89.28% on spectrograms and 83.43% on MFCC.The Naïve Bayes classifier provides a 87.09% accuracy and a 0.985 average AUC while being faster to train and more interpretable. Feature selection shows how F0, MFCC and voicing-related features are the most characterizing for this SR task. The high amount of training samples and the emotional content of the DEMoS dataset better reflect a real case scenario for speaker recognition, and account for the generalization power of the models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10098737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100987372023-04-14 High-Level CNN and Machine Learning Methods for Speaker Recognition Costantini, Giovanni Cesarini, Valerio Brenna, Emanuele Sensors (Basel) Article Speaker Recognition (SR) is a common task in AI-based sound analysis, involving structurally different methodologies such as Deep Learning or “traditional” Machine Learning (ML). In this paper, we compared and explored the two methodologies on the DEMoS dataset consisting of 8869 audio files of 58 speakers in different emotional states. A custom CNN is compared to several pre-trained nets using image inputs of spectrograms and Cepstral-temporal (MFCC) graphs. AML approach based on acoustic feature extraction, selection and multi-class classification by means of a Naïve Bayes model is also considered. Results show how a custom, less deep CNN trained on grayscale spectrogram images obtain the most accurate results, 90.15% on grayscale spectrograms and 83.17% on colored MFCC. AlexNet provides comparable results, reaching 89.28% on spectrograms and 83.43% on MFCC.The Naïve Bayes classifier provides a 87.09% accuracy and a 0.985 average AUC while being faster to train and more interpretable. Feature selection shows how F0, MFCC and voicing-related features are the most characterizing for this SR task. The high amount of training samples and the emotional content of the DEMoS dataset better reflect a real case scenario for speaker recognition, and account for the generalization power of the models. MDPI 2023-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10098737/ /pubmed/37050521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073461 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Costantini, Giovanni Cesarini, Valerio Brenna, Emanuele High-Level CNN and Machine Learning Methods for Speaker Recognition |
title | High-Level CNN and Machine Learning Methods for Speaker Recognition |
title_full | High-Level CNN and Machine Learning Methods for Speaker Recognition |
title_fullStr | High-Level CNN and Machine Learning Methods for Speaker Recognition |
title_full_unstemmed | High-Level CNN and Machine Learning Methods for Speaker Recognition |
title_short | High-Level CNN and Machine Learning Methods for Speaker Recognition |
title_sort | high-level cnn and machine learning methods for speaker recognition |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073461 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costantinigiovanni highlevelcnnandmachinelearningmethodsforspeakerrecognition AT cesarinivalerio highlevelcnnandmachinelearningmethodsforspeakerrecognition AT brennaemanuele highlevelcnnandmachinelearningmethodsforspeakerrecognition |