Cargando…
Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG)—More Than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a widely used tool for assessing the risk of falls in older adults. However, to increase the test’s predictive value, the instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test has been developed, incorporating different technological approaches. This systematic review aims to ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073426 |
_version_ | 1785024896877723648 |
---|---|
author | Ortega-Bastidas, Paulina Gómez, Britam Aqueveque, Pablo Luarte-Martínez, Soledad Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Roberto |
author_facet | Ortega-Bastidas, Paulina Gómez, Britam Aqueveque, Pablo Luarte-Martínez, Soledad Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Roberto |
author_sort | Ortega-Bastidas, Paulina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a widely used tool for assessing the risk of falls in older adults. However, to increase the test’s predictive value, the instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test has been developed, incorporating different technological approaches. This systematic review aims to explore the evidence of the technological proposal for the segmentation and analysis of iTUG in elderlies with or without pathologies. A search was conducted in five major databases, following PRISMA guidelines. The review included 40 studies that met the eligibility criteria. The most used technology was inertial sensors (75% of the studies), with healthy elderlies (35%) and elderlies with Parkinson’s disease (32.5%) being the most analyzed participants. In total, 97.5% of the studies applied automatic segmentation using rule-based algorithms. The iTUG test offers an economical and accessible alternative to increase the predictive value of TUG, identifying different variables, and can be used in clinical, community, and home settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10098780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100987802023-04-14 Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG)—More Than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review Ortega-Bastidas, Paulina Gómez, Britam Aqueveque, Pablo Luarte-Martínez, Soledad Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Roberto Sensors (Basel) Systematic Review The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a widely used tool for assessing the risk of falls in older adults. However, to increase the test’s predictive value, the instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test has been developed, incorporating different technological approaches. This systematic review aims to explore the evidence of the technological proposal for the segmentation and analysis of iTUG in elderlies with or without pathologies. A search was conducted in five major databases, following PRISMA guidelines. The review included 40 studies that met the eligibility criteria. The most used technology was inertial sensors (75% of the studies), with healthy elderlies (35%) and elderlies with Parkinson’s disease (32.5%) being the most analyzed participants. In total, 97.5% of the studies applied automatic segmentation using rule-based algorithms. The iTUG test offers an economical and accessible alternative to increase the predictive value of TUG, identifying different variables, and can be used in clinical, community, and home settings. MDPI 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10098780/ /pubmed/37050485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073426 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Ortega-Bastidas, Paulina Gómez, Britam Aqueveque, Pablo Luarte-Martínez, Soledad Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Roberto Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG)—More Than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review |
title | Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG)—More Than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG)—More Than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG)—More Than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG)—More Than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG)—More Than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | instrumented timed up and go test (itug)—more than assessing time to predict falls: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073426 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ortegabastidaspaulina instrumentedtimedupandgotestitugmorethanassessingtimetopredictfallsasystematicreview AT gomezbritam instrumentedtimedupandgotestitugmorethanassessingtimetopredictfallsasystematicreview AT aquevequepablo instrumentedtimedupandgotestitugmorethanassessingtimetopredictfallsasystematicreview AT luartemartinezsoledad instrumentedtimedupandgotestitugmorethanassessingtimetopredictfallsasystematicreview AT canodelacuerdaroberto instrumentedtimedupandgotestitugmorethanassessingtimetopredictfallsasystematicreview |