Cargando…

Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring—Single Centre Observational Study and Literature Review

Intracranial hypertension and adequacy of brain blood flow are primary concerns following traumatic brain injury. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a critical diagnostic tool in neurocritical care. However, all ICP sensors, irrespective of design, are subject to systematic and random measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pelah, Adam I., Zakrzewska, Agnieszka, Calviello, Leanne A., Forcht Dagi, Teodoro, Czosnyka, Zofia, Czosnyka, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050457
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073397
_version_ 1785024898760966144
author Pelah, Adam I.
Zakrzewska, Agnieszka
Calviello, Leanne A.
Forcht Dagi, Teodoro
Czosnyka, Zofia
Czosnyka, Marek
author_facet Pelah, Adam I.
Zakrzewska, Agnieszka
Calviello, Leanne A.
Forcht Dagi, Teodoro
Czosnyka, Zofia
Czosnyka, Marek
author_sort Pelah, Adam I.
collection PubMed
description Intracranial hypertension and adequacy of brain blood flow are primary concerns following traumatic brain injury. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a critical diagnostic tool in neurocritical care. However, all ICP sensors, irrespective of design, are subject to systematic and random measurement inaccuracies that can affect patient care if overlooked or disregarded. The wide choice of sensors available to surgeons raises questions about performance and suitability for treatment. This observational study offers a critical review of the clinical and experimental assessment of ICP sensor accuracy and comments on the relationship between actual clinical performance, bench testing, and manufacturer specifications. Critically, on this basis, the study offers guidelines for the selection of ICP monitoring technologies, an important clinical decision. To complement this, a literature review on important ICP monitoring considerations was included. This study utilises illustrative clinical and laboratory material from 1200 TBI patients (collected from 1992 to 2019) to present several important points regarding the accuracy of in vivo implementation of contemporary ICP transducers. In addition, a thorough literature search was performed, with sources dating from 1960 to 2021. Sources considered to be relevant matched the keywords: “intraparenchymal ICP sensors”, “fiberoptic ICP sensors”, “piezoelectric strain gauge sensors”, “external ventricular drains”, “CSF reference pressure”, “ICP zero drift”, and “ICP measurement accuracy”. Based on single centre observations and the 76 sources reviewed in this paper, this material reports an overall anticipated measurement accuracy for intraparenchymal transducers of around ± 6.0 mm Hg with an average zero drift of <2.0 mm Hg. Precise ICP monitoring is a key tenet of neurocritical care, and accounting for zero drift is vital. Intraparenchymal piezoelectric strain gauge sensors are commonly implanted to monitor ICP. Laboratory bench testing results can differ from in vivo observations, revealing the shortcomings of current ICP sensors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100987892023-04-14 Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring—Single Centre Observational Study and Literature Review Pelah, Adam I. Zakrzewska, Agnieszka Calviello, Leanne A. Forcht Dagi, Teodoro Czosnyka, Zofia Czosnyka, Marek Sensors (Basel) Review Intracranial hypertension and adequacy of brain blood flow are primary concerns following traumatic brain injury. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a critical diagnostic tool in neurocritical care. However, all ICP sensors, irrespective of design, are subject to systematic and random measurement inaccuracies that can affect patient care if overlooked or disregarded. The wide choice of sensors available to surgeons raises questions about performance and suitability for treatment. This observational study offers a critical review of the clinical and experimental assessment of ICP sensor accuracy and comments on the relationship between actual clinical performance, bench testing, and manufacturer specifications. Critically, on this basis, the study offers guidelines for the selection of ICP monitoring technologies, an important clinical decision. To complement this, a literature review on important ICP monitoring considerations was included. This study utilises illustrative clinical and laboratory material from 1200 TBI patients (collected from 1992 to 2019) to present several important points regarding the accuracy of in vivo implementation of contemporary ICP transducers. In addition, a thorough literature search was performed, with sources dating from 1960 to 2021. Sources considered to be relevant matched the keywords: “intraparenchymal ICP sensors”, “fiberoptic ICP sensors”, “piezoelectric strain gauge sensors”, “external ventricular drains”, “CSF reference pressure”, “ICP zero drift”, and “ICP measurement accuracy”. Based on single centre observations and the 76 sources reviewed in this paper, this material reports an overall anticipated measurement accuracy for intraparenchymal transducers of around ± 6.0 mm Hg with an average zero drift of <2.0 mm Hg. Precise ICP monitoring is a key tenet of neurocritical care, and accounting for zero drift is vital. Intraparenchymal piezoelectric strain gauge sensors are commonly implanted to monitor ICP. Laboratory bench testing results can differ from in vivo observations, revealing the shortcomings of current ICP sensors. MDPI 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10098789/ /pubmed/37050457 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073397 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pelah, Adam I.
Zakrzewska, Agnieszka
Calviello, Leanne A.
Forcht Dagi, Teodoro
Czosnyka, Zofia
Czosnyka, Marek
Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring—Single Centre Observational Study and Literature Review
title Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring—Single Centre Observational Study and Literature Review
title_full Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring—Single Centre Observational Study and Literature Review
title_fullStr Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring—Single Centre Observational Study and Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring—Single Centre Observational Study and Literature Review
title_short Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring—Single Centre Observational Study and Literature Review
title_sort accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring—single centre observational study and literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050457
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073397
work_keys_str_mv AT pelahadami accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsinglecentreobservationalstudyandliteraturereview
AT zakrzewskaagnieszka accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsinglecentreobservationalstudyandliteraturereview
AT calvielloleannea accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsinglecentreobservationalstudyandliteraturereview
AT forchtdagiteodoro accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsinglecentreobservationalstudyandliteraturereview
AT czosnykazofia accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsinglecentreobservationalstudyandliteraturereview
AT czosnykamarek accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsinglecentreobservationalstudyandliteraturereview